Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a p singh · Page 1 of about 12,373 results (0.567 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 13 2006

Dr. Arun Kumar Verma Vs. the State of Jharkhand,

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-13-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Medical Services Cadre Post and Recruitment Rules, 1997

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR712

Advocate for Appellant : V. P. Singh, Sr. Adv and; A.K. Sahani, Adv.; Sriram Prat

Ramesh Kumar Merathia, J.1. As per the last order, heard the parties, for disposal of this writ petition at this stage.2. Petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the notification contained in Memo No. 149 (1) dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2005

Pankaj Bibhuti and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 304B and 498A

Reported in : 2006CriLJ926; II(2006)DMC489; [2005(4)JCR435(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. and; Ashok Kr. Sinha, Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. All the appellants were tried for the offence under Sections 304-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code for committing the dowry death of Nitu Devi in furtherance of common intention and also for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 2007

Ranchi Regional Development Authority Through Its Secretary, Mr. Ajay ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Nov-02-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Bihar Regional Development Authorities Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 21(2), 24, 24(1), 24(2), 29(2) and 67; Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act - Sections 19(1); Bihar Regional Development Authorities Rules - Rule 67; Bihar and Orissa G.C. Act - Sections 28

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR227(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.,; Nisha Thakur and Vandana Bharti, Advs.;

M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J.1. M/s DEMCO Pvt. Ltd., the owner of the land in question applied for a Land Use Certificate from Ranchi Regional Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'RRDA' for short). After considering the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 24 2003

R.N. Dwivedi Vs. Chairman Coal India Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-24-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR535(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh and; J. Dubey, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for issuance of an appropriate direction upon the respondents to restore inter se seniority in the gradation list of integrated seniority of the Executives...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 2009

Tata Motors Ltd. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-20-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10, 33A and 33C(2); Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act; Constitution of India - Article 133(1)

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2179

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Ajit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief:(A) For issuance of a writ of certioran or in nature thereof for quashing/canceling/rescinding- (i) The order date 20/12/2003 (Annexure-9) passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2008

Surendra Sharma Alias Surendra Prasad Sharma Vs. Stephen Marandi

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-05-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 82, 83 and 86(1); Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 16, 32, 341, 342, 342(1), 346, 347, 348, 348(1), 348(3) and 366(25); State Re-Origination Act, 2000; Official Languages Act, 1963 - Sections 3 and 5; Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Orders, 1950

Reported in : 2008(57)BLJR117; [2008(4)JCR260(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.,; Mukesh Kumar,; A.K. Sinha and

D.P. Singh, J.1. The present election petition has been preferred by the petitioner for declaring election of the sole respondent, the returned candidate from 10-Dumka Assembly Constituency reserved for scheduled tribe category as null and void.The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2003

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, La ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Aug-28-2003

Subject : Labour and IndustrialService

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR207(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.,; Sat Prakash,; Ashok Kumar Sinha

Tapen Sen, J. 1. The petitioner (M/s. Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Limited) has filed the instant writ application challenging the Award dated 3.1.2000 (pronounced on 9.9.2000) in Reference Case No. 7 of 1991 (Annexure 1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2006

Shivang Transport Co. Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-12-2006

Subject : Company

Reported in : AIR2007Jhar9; [2006(4)JCR168(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.; A.K. Sahani, Adv.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. Originally the writ application, was filed by the petitioner-company for quashing of the order as contained in Annexure-13 dated 24.9.1997 issued under the signature of the respondent No. 3, whereby the petitioner-company was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2009

Abhay Nath Manjhi Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-27-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Civil Services Classification and Appeal Rules - Rule 49 and 55; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR2438

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. and; A.K. Sahani, Adv.

ORDERAjit Kumar Sinha, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred for grant of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari or an order or direction for quashing the Notification issued under Memo No. 627...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1992

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Vinod Prakash Tayal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-1992

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC412

M.N. Venkatachaliah and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the caveator. The points urged by the learned counsel on the merits of the view taken by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial