Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a p shinde · Page 1 of about 21 results (0.046 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 04 2007

Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele Vs. Divisional Controller

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-04-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(14), 3, 3(5), 10(2), 28 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25F and 25G; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 81; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Contract Labour Act; Labour and Industrial Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 227

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR80; 2007(5)BomCR177

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Shinde, Adv.

Chaudhari A.B., J.1. The petitioner herein is an unfortunate widow belonging to backward class whose bread has been snatched by the respondent, the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Chandrapur Division, Chandrapur (for short, the 'MSRTC') putting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2008

Gajanan Bhaurao Waghmare and Madhukar Fakiraji Sute Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-02-2008

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Township Act, 1965 - Sections 2(6), 9(1), 11, 11(1), 15, 21 and 321; Maharashtra Municipal Council and Nagar Panchayats (Qualifications and Appointments of Nominated Councilors) Rules, 2006 - Rules 3 and 5

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR349; 2008(3)MhLj225

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Chandurkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 14 of 2007, ;F.T. Mirza, Adv. in W.P. No. 35 of 2007, ;A.A. Naik, Adv. in W.P. No. 234 of 2007, ;C.S. Kaptan, Adv. in W.P. No. 395/2007 and ;S.V. Bhutada, Adv. in W.P

R.C. Chavan, J.1. Rule in W.P. No. 234/2007. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally at this stage with the group of connected petitions.2. By these petitions, the petitioners question the validity of amended Rules 3 and 5 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2012

Vilas Babu @ Ramling Sonavane Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2012

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Sarojini Upadhyay

Oral Judgment: (V.M. Kanade, J.) 1. Heard, Mrs. Sarojini Upadhyay, Learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mrs. P.P. Shinde, Learned APP for the State. 2. The Appellant is challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 06 2012

Vilas Babu @ Ramling Sonavane Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-06-2012

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Sarojini Upadhyay

Oral Judgment: (V.M. Kanade, J.) 1. Heard, Mrs. Sarojini Upadhyay, Learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mrs. P.P. Shinde, Learned APP for the State. 2. The Appellant is challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2022

Maharashtra State Board Of Wakfs Vs. Shaikh Yusuf Bhai Chawla

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI __

‘REPORTABLE’ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7812-7814 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 31288-31290 of 2011) MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS Appellant (s) VERSUS SHAIKH YUSUF BHAI CHAWLA &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2005

Pooja D/O Shankarlal Manshani Vs. Rashtra Sant Tukdoji Maharaj Univers ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-02-2005

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR128; 2006(1)MhLj99

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Sudame, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J. 1. Heard Mr. M. M. Sudame, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. A. P. Shinde, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. Rule, made returnable forthwith by the consent of the parties.3. Learned Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 08 1959

Rifle Factory Co-operative Society Ltd. (Stores Branch) Vs. Fourth Ind ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-08-1959

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950 - Section 20, 20(1) and 20(2); ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11, 33C, 33C(1) and 33C(2)

Reported in : AIR1959Cal349,(1960)IILLJ517Cal

Advocate for Appellant : Phanindra Kumar Sannyal and ;Kiran Mitra, Advs.

P.B. Mukharji, J.1. This is an industrial dispute between the Rifle Factory Co-operative Society Ltd. and its workmen. The petitioner applied for and obtained a Rule nisi on 25-1-1956 for a writ in the nature of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2002

Prashant Vs. S.K. Sarkar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-24-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138 and 142; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD(Cri)953; 2002BomCR(Cri)672; 2002CriLJ3001; 2002(2)MhLj125

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Shinde, Adv.

1. Heard Mrs. Shinde, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri S.D. Dewani, learned Advocate for the non-applicant.2. The revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 04.12.2000 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2007

Shahaja Begum Mohammad Ali Through General Power of Attorney Mohammad ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-05-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 46; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR30; 2007(2)BomCR568; (2007)109BOMLR672; 2007(4)MhLj439

Advocate for Appellant : M.D. Sonwane and ;D.P. Shinde, Advs.

S.B. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final hearing.3. This petition is directed against the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 2004

Dilawarkhan Kadarkhan Pathan Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Board a ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-30-2004

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Maharashtra State Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations - Regulation 17

Reported in : 2005(2)BomCR895

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Shinde, Adv.

Sinha D.D., J.1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. The Counsel for the petitioner states that father of the petitioner was working as Watchman in the employment of respondent-Board. The father of the petitioner underwent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial