Advanced Search Results
Praveen Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
May-04-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 177, 179, 180, 220, 220(1), 223, 235, 239 and 279; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 114, 149, 363, 366, 376 and 403
2002BomCR(Cri)300; 2001CriLJ3417
C.P. Sen Sr. Adv., ;M.H. Rizwy, ;A.M. Rizwy and ;Uday Dastane, Advs.
ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. The applicants have been charge-sheeted along with other co-accused for offences under Sections 363, 366, 376 read with Section 34 of IPC. An application for discharge was filed by the applicants on two...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentury Spinning and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Motilal Dhariwal S/O D ...
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-18-1966
Contract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 62 and 63
AIR1966MP313
A.P. Sen, Adv.
Bhargava, J. 1. This is an appeal by the defendant in civil suit No. 2-B of 1958 against the order made by the First Additional District Judge, Raipur on 30-1-1964 dismissing its application for staying the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKuldeepsingh S/O Kesharsingh Pabla and ors. Vs. the State of Maharasht ...
Mumbai
Jun-30-1993
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37
1994(3)BomCR643; (1993)95BOMLR714
C.P. Sen, Adv.
G.D. Kamat, J.1. This Criminal Writ Petition prays for a declaration that the detention of the petitioners after expiry of 90 days from the date of their arrest is unconstitutional, illegal and unauthorised and further seeks...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Association of Chemists, M.S.E.B. Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Bo ...
Mumbai
Aug-21-2007
Constitution
2007(6)ALLMR71; 2008(3)BomCR369; [2007(115)FLR912]; 2008(1)MhLj124
V.D. Muley, Adv. in W.P. No. 584 of 1989 and ;C.P. Sen, Sr. Counsel in W.P. No. 3521 of 1994
R.C. Chavan, J.1. These petitions, by Association of Chemists and Federation of Indian Pharmacists, working with respondent Maharashtra State Electricity Board, make out a grievance about injustice caused to them in the matter of pay scales.W.P....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadanlal Kothari Son of Champalal Kothari Vs. the Bank of Maharashtra ...
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-06-1963
TenancyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96 - Order 41, Rules 4 and 22
AIR1964MP262; 1964MPLJ111
A.P. Sen, Adv.
S.P. Bhargava, J.1. This is defendant's second appeal arising out of a suit for ejectment and recovery of damages for use and occupation and future mesne profits. The appellant was impleaded as second defendant in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.N. Misra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-17-1986
Service
Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service Rules, 1968 - Rule 16(6)
1986Supp(1)SCC570
Shanti Bhushan; K.R. Nagaraja, Advs.
A.P. Sen; B.C. Ray, JJ.1. Special leave granted limited to the question whether the principle of continuous officiation upon which the Central Administrative Tribunal has directed inter se seniority to be determined as between direct recruits...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHi Point Services Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Chloro Controls (India) Pvt.Ltd. and or ...
Delhi
Jul-28-2011
Company Law
Indian Companies Act, 1956; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 27
Mr.Rohit Kapadia; Mr.J.P.Sen; Mr.Yash R.Kapadia; Mr.Simil Purohit; Mr.Pranav Desai; Mr.H.K.Sudhakara; Ms.Arundhati Iyer, Advs.
1. Both these appeals are instituted against the common judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in the Notice of Motion No.553 of 2004 and the Notice of Motion No.2382 of 2004...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSachindra Prasad Chakravarty and anr. Vs. Ahmed Ali and ors.
Guwahati
Jul-18-1986
CommercialCivil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 34
K.P. Sen and A.K.A. Laskar, Advs.
K.N. Saikia, J. 1. The three defendants, of whom two are appellants before us were sued in Money Suit No. 26/76 by the two plaintiffs-respondents for recovery of Rs. 30,632.25 with 12% interest thereon, being price...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatanlal Hukumchand Vs. Additional Commissioner of Sales Tax and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-22-1966
Sales Tax
[1967]19STC92(MP)
C.P. Sen, Adv.
ORDERR.J. Bhave, J.1. The petitioner is a Hindu undivided family trading under the name and style 'Messrs Ratanlal Hukumchand' at Ujjain and is a registered dealer under the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeniprasad Agarwal Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd.
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-14-1957
Intellectual Property Rights
Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 22
AIR1958MP348
A.P. Sen, Adv.
M. Hidayatulla, C.J. 1. This appeal is by one Beniprasad Agarwal who trades in the name and style of 'Bajoria Soap Works', at Sindi Bazar, Kharsia, in the Raigarh district. The appeal is directed against the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »