Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a p ray · Page 1 of about 443 results (0.086 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 16 1991

Sharma S.D. Vs. Ramesh Mahakud and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-16-1991

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95 and 95(2); Orissa Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940 - Rule 95

Reported in : 1993ACJ385; (1999)IIILLJ418Ori

Advocate for Appellant : Pradip Mohanty and ;B.P. Ray, Advs.

S.C. Mohapatra, J. 1. These three appeals by the employer under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') arise out of the same accident. All the three appeals having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 1984

Arun Chandra Malakar Vs. Patilal Roy and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jun-22-1984

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96(2) - Order 8, Rule 10 - Order 9, Rule 13 - Order 43, Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Bhattacharjee, P. Ray and N.Z. Ahmed, Advs.

K. Lahiri, J. 1. On 16-9-78 the appellant-plaintiff obtained an ex parte order under Order 8 Rule 10 of the Civil P.C., for short 'the Code' and the follow up decree was prepared on 18-9-78. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2003

Rajkumari Panigrahi and Etc. Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-05-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 457

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1004

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Ray, S. Pujari, P.K. Patnaik, B. Sahoo, J.A. Reddy and S. Sharma

ORDERP.K. Tripathy, J.1. All the aforesaid Criminal Misc. Cases are as against rejection of the applications under Section 457 of the Criminal Procedure Code (in short, 'the Code') on 22-12-2001 by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambalpur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 13 1998

Gurparlad Singh Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Sambalpur and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : May-13-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Orissa Forest Act, 1972 - Sections 56

Reported in : AIR1998Ori177

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Ray and ;P.C. Rout, Advs.

R.K. Patra, J.1. The Authorised Officer-cum-Assistant Conservator of Forests, Rairakhol Division by order dated 11-3-1994 (Annexure 1) directed confiscation of truck bearing registration No. MP-23-B-5595 belonging to the petitioner. Against the said order of confiscation made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 1997

Sanat Alias Santha Mishra Alias Sanat Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-05-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 323 and 506; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22(5) and 23(5)

Reported in : 1998CriLJ889

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Ray, ;S.C. Parija, ;P.C. Rout, ;S. Pujhari and ;P.K. Patnaik, Advs.

A. Pasayat, J.1. Questioning legality of the detention order passed by the District Magistrate, Sundargarh in purported exercise of power under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (in short, 'the Act') this habeas corpus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1995

Pravakar Gochhayat and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-03-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 154, 307, 323 and 341; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Probation of Offenders Act

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT(Cri)10; 81(1996)CLT175; 1996(I)OLR75

Advocate for Appellant : P. Mohanty, B.P. Ray, A.K. Dalai, A. Mohanty and U.M. Pattnaik

R.K. Dash, J. 1. The petitioners (hereinafter referred to as 'the accused') faced trial under Sections 341 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code in G. R. Case No. 2286 of 1990,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2002

Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Subhagini Seth an ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Nov-01-2002

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 140(3), 145 and 147

Reported in : II(2003)ACC315; 95(2003)CLT230

Advocate for Appellant : P. Ray, Adv.

Pradipta Ray, J.1. On May 27, 1998 there was an accident between a Mini Truck bearing registration No. OR-15-5756 and a Dumper. One Ramesh Seth was critically injured in the accident and ultimately succumbed to his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1996

Jogeswar Majhi Vs. Ramia Kisan @ Lakra and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-25-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Orissa Scheduled Areas Transfer of Improvable Property (by Scheduled Tribes), Regulations - Regulation 3A

Reported in : AIR1997Ori197

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Ray and ;Pradip Mohanty, Advs.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this writ application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner calls in question the order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Sundargarh (opposite party No. 2) in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1990

Punia Biswal Vs. Divisional Forest Officer, Rairakhol and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-06-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1990Ori219; 70(1990)CLT181

Advocate for Appellant : Pradip Mohanty and ;B.P. Ray, Advs.

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2. Petitioner purchased some standing trees from other private persons who claim those trees to be standing on their private land. On...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1992

Amruta Gadtia Vs. Trilochan Pradhan and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Jul-31-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354, 376 and 493

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1022

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Ray, Adv.

L. Rath, J. 1. The appellant assails the acquittal of the two respondents who are respectively son and father. While respondent No. 1 had been charged under Section 493, IPC, respondent No. 2 had been charged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial