Advanced Search Results
Kothari and Company Vs. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-07-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)204CTR(MP)298
S.C. Bagadia with D.K. Chhabra, for the Assessee A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.This is an appeal filed by the assessee under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter for brevity called 'the Act'), against an order dated 9-4-2001, passed by Tribunal, Indore in ITA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Om Prakash Bagadia
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-18-2004
Direct Taxation
[2005]144TAXMAN637(MP)
A.P. Patankar for the Applicant.
ORDERSapre, J.The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern disposal of ITA No. 60 of 2003, as both these appeals arise out of common order and secondly, appeals arise between the same parties.2. This is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Smt. Anita Chouhan
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-22-2005
Direct Taxation
[2008]296ITR691(MP); [2006]155TAXMAN136(MP)
A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue.
ORDER1. This is an appeal filed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against an order, dated 11-2-2005, passed by learned Members of ITAT in ITA No. 494/IND./2004.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dhanya Kumar JaIn Vs. Asstt. Cit
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-20-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)202CTR(MP)599; [2006]153TAXMAN540(MP)
K.N. Puntambekar, for the Assessee A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue.
ORDERBy The CourtThis is an appeal filed by assessee under section 260A of the Income Tax Act against an order, dated 3-8-2001, passed by Tribunal in ITA No. 44/Ind/1996. It was admitted for final hearing on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmee Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Cit and anr.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-22-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)205CTR(MP)386
S.C. Goyal, for the Assessee A.P. Patankar, for the Revenue.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J :The decision rendered in this appeal shall also govern disposal of IT Appeal No. 51 of 2002 because both these appeals arise out of common impugned order, passed by Tribunal except the difference...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskClassic Builders and Developers Vs. Union of India
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-16-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]115TAXMAN393(MP)
G.M. Chaphekar and J.W. Mahajan for the Assessee A.P. Patankar for the Revenue
ORDERBy filing this writ under articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner claims following relief :'7(a) By an appropriate writ, direction or order the respondent No. 4 be directed not to accept the valuation...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome Tax Officer Vs. Ramkishore Rewaram Tada
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-21-2006
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A, 269SS, 271D, 275 and 275(1)
(2006)202CTR(MP)404; [2006]287ITR239(MP)
A.P. Patankar, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue (CIT) under Section 260A of the IT Act against an order dt. 25th Nov., 2002 passed by Tribunal in IT Appeal No. 529/Ind/1999. The appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rajmal Bapulal
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-27-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 158BC and 260A
(2005)198CTR(MP)241; [2008]303ITR222(MP)
A.P. Patankar, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue (IT Department) under Section 260A of the IT Act against an order dt. 30th April, 2004, passed by Tribunal in IT(SS)A 40/Ind/2002 and C.O. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Pradeep Kumar Ganediwal
Madhya Pradesh
Sep-25-2001
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260A and 271(1)
[2002]253ITR361(MP)
A.P. Patankar, Adv.
1. Heard Shri A. P. Patankar, learned counsel for the appellant on admission.2. This appeal has been preferred, at the instance of the Revenue, under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vinod Prakash Saxena
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-14-2005
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 158BC and 260A
(2006)203CTR(MP)73
A.P. Patankar, Adv.
ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is an appeal filed by CIT under Section 260A of the IT Act, against an order dt. 26th Sept., 2000, passed by Tribunal in ITA No. 12/Ind/1996 for the block asst. yrs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »