Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a p pandey · Page 1 of about 701 results (0.148 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 14 2010

Dhananjay Pandey. Vs. State of Bihar, and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-14-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482, 203, 202; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 395, 467, 468 , 471, 120B; Arms Act - Section 27

Advocate for Appellant : S/Sri K.N.Choubey; Ambuj Nayan Choubey; Siddharth Harsh; Ritu Priyadarshini; S/Sri B.P.Pandey; P.K.Sinha; S.C.Giri; Jaganath Singh, Advs.

1. During the course of hearing, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner has produced certified copy of the order dated 27.3.2000 passed in Complaint Case No.245 of 2000. Let it be kept on record. 2. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 1963

Lachhimi Nath Pathak and anr. Vs. Bholanath Pathak and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-07-1963

Subject : Property

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Articles 142 and 144; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1964All383

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Pandey, Adv.

Mithan Lal, J.1. This second appeal filed byof the defendants is directed against the judgment of Hari Har Sharan, Civil Judge, Allahabad, reversing the decree of the trial Court and decreeing the plaintiff's suit.2. The dispute...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1999

Kakar Sugar Works Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-29-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purhcase Tax) Act, 1961 - Sections 3(1); Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane (Purchase Tax) Rules, 1961 - Rules 13A(1), (2) and (4);

Reported in : 2000(1)AWC210

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Pandey, Adv.

P. K. Jain, J. 1. In the assessment year 1994-95, the petitioner was operating a sugar cane crusher under the name and style of M/s. Kakar Sugar Works. He had submitted Option in Form 13 in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 1996

Parmatma Nand Yadav Vs. District Inspector of Schools and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Regulations - Regulation 6

Reported in : (1997)1UPLBEC308

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Pandey, Adv.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The present Special Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 9th September, 1994 passed in writ petition No. 21389 of 1990, by which the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2005

Vinod Kumar Pandey Son of Sri JahIn NaraIn Pandey and ors. Vs. State o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-11-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 25 and 34; ;Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1999; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 117; Constitution of India - Article 243G; Constitution of India (73rd Amendment) Act

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC65

Advocate for Appellant : Shashi Nandan, ;S.R. Verma, ;S.P. Pandey, ;A.N. Mishra, ;S.K. Mishra, ;V.K. Singh, ;Mohd. Yusuf and ;Neel Kamal, Advs.

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. In these batch of writ petitions, the petitioners were appointed as Tubewell Operators in the Irrigation department of the State of U.P. Subsequently, their services were transferred to different Gram Panchayats and are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2006

Birendra Kumar Thakur Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-13-2006

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2007(1)BLJR168

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Pandey, Sr. Adv.

R.K. Merathia, J.1. Petitioner filed this writ petition for direction on the respondents to promote him to the post of Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories (Productivity) (DCIF (P) for short) as he has been performing all...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2011

Sripati Narayan Dubey. Vs. State of Jharkhand Through S.P, C.B.i.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Decided on : Mar-18-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 120B, 467, 468, 471, 477A; Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 13(1)(d); Constitution of India - Article 20(2), 221(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - 300(1).

Advocate for Appellant : Mr..B.P.Pandey, Adv.

1. Extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by the petitioner for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of R.C. Case no.38A of 1996 PAT and R.C. Case no.45A of 1996 PAT so far it relates...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2010

Sunil Kumar Mahto, and ors. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-08-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498A, 120B, 406,420, 323, 342, 304B read with 34

Advocate for Appellant : S/Sri B.P.Pandey; Jagannath Singh; Praveen Kumar Sinha, Advs.

1. Three petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of an order dated 30.9.1999 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Samastipur, at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2000

Sheorati Devi Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-20-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 149, 302, 324, 337 and 436; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 313, 464 and 464(2)

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Pandey, Sr. Adv.

Narayan Roy, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of common judgment of conviction and sentence, and, therefore, they have been heard together and are being disposed off by common judgment.2. Heard Mr. B.P. Pandey, learned senior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 1959

R.J. Singh Vs. the Electric Inspector to the Govt. of Uttar Pradesh at ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-1959

Subject : ElectricityConstitution

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 37; Electricity Rules - Rule 45; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 245

Reported in : AIR1960All87

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Pandey, Adv.

ORDERJagdish Sahai, J. 1. The petitioner obtained an A class electrical contractor's licence in the year 1950. It was renewed year after year till the year 1958. The petitioner carried on electric installations in connection with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial