Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a p moharil · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 27 2012

Bhavana W/O Anil thengdi Vs. 2) 3rd Joint Civil Judge.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-27-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 18 Rule 17, Section 24

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Dharmadhikari, Adv.

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for the parties.2) This writ petition is directed against the order below Exh. 118, dated 20/2/2012 passed by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2005

Dilip Bidesh and ors. Vs. Shivgopal Madangopal Chaurasia and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-25-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1887 - Sections 9, 15, 16, 17, 18, 18(1), 18(5), 20, 20A, 20(1), 24 to 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 91, 92, 94, 95, 96 to 112 and 115; Slum Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Limitation Act 1963 - Sections 4, 5 and 12; Provincial Small Causes Courts and Presidency Small Causes Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 11, 11(2) and 20; Kerala High Court Act, 1958 - Sections 18(5) and 20; Karnataka Rent Control Act - Sections 48(6) and 50; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ,

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR463; 2005(6)BomCR207; 2005(4)MhLj967

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Moharil, Adv.

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. In this Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, challenge is to the judgment dated 20-3-2003 delivered by Second Additional District Judge, Nagpur in R.C.A. 574/2001 in an appeal under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1977

Vikram Yeshwanta and ors. Vs. Eknath Trimbak Gadekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-23-1977

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 4-B, 7, 10, 20, 21, 21(1), 21(2), 21(3), 21(4), 21(5), 29, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 41 to 44, 46, 49-A, 49-A(1), 49-A(4), 49-A(5), 50, 52, 84, 88-B, 120, 124, 125, 128-A and 129; Berar Regulation of Agricultural Leases Act, 1951; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Rules, 1958 - Rule 11; Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 139 and 144; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 88-B

Reported in : AIR1978Bom71; 1977MhLJ520

Advocate for Appellant : J.N. Chandurkar and ;S.A. Jaiswal, Advs.;R.R. Deshpande, Adv.

Dharmadhikari, J.1. The father of the petitioners, namely, Yeshwanta, was the original tenant from the year 1951-52 of the field S. No. 19/1, area 19 acres 32 gunthas of village Murdapur, Tahsil Chikhali, District Buldana. One...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial