Advanced Search Results

Triloki Nath Pandey and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 134-A, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2 and 24; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2 and 2(7) - Order XXVII, Rules 4 and 8-B; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Rules - Rules 1, 2, 99, 103 and 162; Uttar Pradesh Fundamental Act - Sections 7 and 9; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 7-B, 241 and 241(2); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 114

Reported in : AIR1990All143; (1990)1UPLBEC542

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. Mathur, Adv.

ORDERV. N. Khare, J.1. Since common questions of fact and law in this writ petition and in the connected writ petitions are involved, we propose to decide these writ petitions by a common judgment.2. The petitioner...

Vidya Ply and Board (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1993(46)LC105(Allahabad)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. A.P. Mathur, Shri. Mathur

ORDERD.S. Sinha, J.1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add a party.2. Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shishir Kumar, learned Counsel representing the respondents.3. The petitioner is private...

Dr. Umrao Singh Choudhary Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 162; Administrative Law; Madhya Pradesh Vishwa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 4, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 40, 47, 50, 52(1), 52(3), 52(4) and 68

Reported in : AIR1995MP75

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur, Senior Adv. and ;P. Mathur, Adv.

V.D. Gyani, J. 1. Judicial review of Staleaction by way of certiorari has been invokedby none else than the Vice-Chancellor of DeviAhilya Vishwavidhalaya, Indore. This Courtis faced with a dispute in which academicadministrative law, delegated legislation...

Hind Cement Products Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11A(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 9(2)

Reported in : 1987(14)ECC26; 1987(13)LC439(Allahabad); 1987(32)ELT636(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mathur and ;V.K. Agarwal, Advs.

Om Prakash, J.1. The only question for consideration in this writ petition filed by M/s. Hind Cement Products Limited (hereinafter to be referred as the petitioner unit, which is owned by the Hind Ceramics Limited hereinafter...

Quality Exports and Chemicals Vs. Cegat, New Delhi

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A, 14, 35F and 35K; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 54

Reported in : 2002(140)ELT362(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mathur, Adv.

ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1. The petitioners are partnership concern engaged in manufacturing of menthol and DMO and are registered with the Central Excise Department for the same. On 12-7-1995 the Central Excise Officers inspected the premises of...

Shri Anant Ram Sarangal and Shri Vs. Balwant Bros. Pvt. Ltd., Shri

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2007)1CompLJ350

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. U.P. Mathur, Shri. Mathur

1. In this order I am considering CP No. 65/2005 filed under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 by Shri Anant Ram Sarangal and Shri Ajay Sarangal, Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 respectively alleging "oppression"...

Badarpur thermal Power Station and anr. Vs. Central Government Industr ...

Court : Patna

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(4)

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Mathur,V. Shivnath, Neelima Reddy, M.B. Lal and D.K. Prasad, Advs.

R.N. Sahay, J. 1. The Central Government vide notificationdated April 5, 1980, referred a dispute betweenthe petitioners and workmen under Section 10(4) of the Industrial Disputes Act for adjucationto the Central Industrial Tribunal, Dhanbad.The terms of...

Cownpore Engineering Stores Vs. Cegat and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilExcise

Acts : Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - Rule 20

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ341All

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mathur, Counsel

Prakash Krishna, J.1. Heard Shri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Subodh Kumar, Learned Standing Counsel for Union of India.2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 22.11.2001...

Jhabboo Lal Kesara Rolling Mills Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35 and 36; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 226

Reported in : 1985(19)ELT367(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mathur, Adv.

V.K. Mehrotra, J.1. M/s. Jhabboo Lal Kasera Rolling Mills, Mirzapur, the petitioner, felt aggrieved by an order dated September 12, 1972 , passed by the Deputy Collector, Central Excise, Allahabad, after considering the explanation offered by...

Luxco Electronics Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1988(33)ELT641(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Mathur, Adv.

1. The petitioner had come earlier to this court in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India which was disposed of by us on 22nd May, 1987 [1987 (31) ELT 883 (All.)]....