Advanced Search Results

Smt. Usha Tripathi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)66TTJ(All)508

ORDERLS. VERMA, J.M.:In this appeal the assessee has objected to the assessment order for block period passed by the assessing officer under the provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter called the Act)...

Shri Vinod Vithal Rane Vs. Shri R.H. Mendonca and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(1), 5-A and 55; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 55, 57, 107, 109, 110, 149 and 151; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 56; Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 226; Maharashtra Prevention of Communal, Anti-Social and Other Dangerous Activites Act, 1980; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 17; Maharashtra Amendment Act, 1996; Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1985; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 379 and 425; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 2; Arms Act, 1959; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930

Reported in : 2001BomCR(Cri)537; (2001)2BOMLR307; 2001(2)MhLj437

Advocate for Appellant : Shri U.N. Tripathi, Adv.;Shri S.R. Chitnis Amicus Curiae

A. M. Khanwilkar, J.1. All these five writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seek to challenge the respective detention orders passed by Shri R. H. Mendonca, Commissioner of Police, Birhan Mumbai, in...

Smt. Sabina Shaikh Vs. Shri M. N. Singh, Commissioner of Police, Great ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 1 and 3(1); Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons (Amendment) Act, 1996 ; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code 1860 - Sections 141, 142, 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324 and 506; Arms Act 1959 - Sections 3, 25 and 27;

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)814

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner who styles herself as the wife of the detenu Mohd. Siraj Jainul Abedin Shaikh, has impugned the detention...

Akhilesh Kumar Misra, and Others Vs. the High Court of Judicature at A ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 24, 24(1), 26A, 29, 30, 33 and 49 to 54; Bar Council of India Rules, 1975 - Rules 44 and 57A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 24, 24(9) and 25; Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975 - Rule 5

Reported in : AIR1995All148; [1995(71)FLR92]; (1995)1UPLBEC374

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kumar and ;K.N. Tripathi, Advs.

ORDERPalok Basu, J.1. Sri Akhilesh Kumar Misra, Sri Rajesh Kumar Saxena and Sri Abhimanu Kumar Misra have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the prayer that a writ in...

Dr. Md. Asrarul Haque (Scientist F (Retd) and Others Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: R.K. Kapoor with T.N. Tripathi, Advocates. For the Respondents: D.S. Mahendru, Advocate.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) 1. Six Applicants have jointly filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and prayed for the following relief(s) :- “(a) Allow the present OA...

Shri Rafiq Yusuf Shaikh Vs. Shri R.S. Sharma, Commissioner of Police,

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 324, 387 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2004(4)MhLj1079

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

V.K. Tahilramani, J.1. The petitioner who is the brother of detenu Rizwan Yosuf Shaikh alias Joe has impugned the order of detention dated 6th March, 2003 passed by respondent No. 1 i.e. Commissioner of Police, Greater...

Shri Chandrakant Vithal Dalvi Vs. Shri R. D. Tyagi and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4) and 8(1), ;Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)353

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. By means of this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner hereinafter referred to as the detenue, has impugned the detention order dated 28th November, 1995 passed by...

Ravi Chabiram Sharma Vs. R.H. Mendonca, Commissioner of Police and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 5-A; Constitution of India - Article 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR271; 1999BomCR(Cri)271; 1999CriLJ2960; 1999(1)MhLj839

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.;Rajiv L. Patil, Addl. P.P.

ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. Through filing this writ of Habeas Corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-the detenu himself -has challenged the order of detention passed by the first respondent Mr. R.H. Mendonca,...

P. Ravi Kumar and Others Vs. National Technical Research Organisation, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: Devesh Singh with T.N. Tripathi, R.K. Shukla, Uday N. Tiwari with Abir Phukan, Advocates. For the Respondents: Krishan Kumar, Advocate.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) 1. By this common order, we are proposing to decide three Original Applications with the consent of the counsel for parties, as the issues involved in these OAs are same....

Mohan Vithal Takire Vs. Satish Sahney and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 1997CriLJ635

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. By means of this writ petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner (the detenu) has impugned the detention order dated 19th September 1995, passed by respondent No. 1...