Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a n mulla · Page 1 of about 201 results (0.042 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 03 1987

Betal Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-03-1987

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Supreme Court Rules, 1966 - Order 21 Rule 15(C); Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1970

Reported in : 1987Supp(1)SCC431

A.P. Sen and; B.C. Ray, JJ.1. This is a case of ghastly murder. We are not inclined to grant any bail. Shri A.N. Mulla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner does not wish to press the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 1960

Ram Singh Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-17-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 367; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR1960All748; 1960CriLJ1536

Advocate for Appellant : Pratap Narain Misra and ;S.N. Mulla, Advs.

Dhavan, J.1. Ram Singh and Gopal have been sentenced to death by the learned Sessions Judge, Mainpuri for the murder of Mr. Kunwar Krishna Kapoor. The case of the prosecution against them very briefly was this....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2000

Karim Abdul Rehman Shaikh Vs. Shehnaz Karim Shaikh and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2000

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 - Rule 7; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7; Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 7 and 125 to 128; Family Courts Act, 1984 -Sections 7, 8 and 20; Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Rules, 1986 - Rule 4

Reported in : 2000(4)ALLMR258; 2000(5)BomCR758; 2000CriLJ3560; II(2000)DMC634

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mulla and ;A.R. Shaikh, Advs.;H.A. Solkar, ;M.H. Solkar for ;All India Milli Council;I.S. Thakur for State;Jametul Ulma (Maharashtra) as Intervener;Y.H. Muchala, ;N.D. Bhatkar, ;B.P. Pandya and ;

ORDERSmt. Ranjana Desai, J.1. In this reference we are called upon to decide certain issues, which are very vital to Muslim women. The learned Single Judge of this Court, Justice Bhairavia came to a conclusion that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 1994

Tihul and anr. (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-22-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302

Reported in : 1994CriLJ2918

Advocate for Appellant : I.N. Mulla, Adv.

Palok Basu, J.1. This appeal has been filed by Tihul and his wife Smt. Ramapati against the conviction and sentence under Section 302/34, I.P.C. passed by II Addl, Sessions Judge, Basti on 23-8-1979 in Sessions trial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1976

Bajrang Lal (Since Deceased) and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-1976

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21, 21(9), 21(10), 29, 120-B, 420, 463, 464, 465, 468 and 471

Reported in : AIR1976SC1008; 1976CriLJ727; (1976)2SCC217; [1976]3SCR497; 1976(8)LC277(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mulla,; S.K. Mehta,; M. Qamaruddin, Advs

R.S. Sarkaria, J.1. This appeal by special leave is directed against a judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan. It arises out of these facts:2. There is an office of the Works Manager, Northern Railway at...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 14 1983

Ram Parshad Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-14-1983

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 25(1984)DLT112; 1984(6)DRJ234

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mulla,; C.M. Nayar and; D.R. Sethi, Advs

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J. (1) Shri G. S. Dakha Additional Sessions Judge Delhi by his judgment under appeal found the appellants guilty under Section 392/34 Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to undergo R.I. for life. Appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1980

Electrical Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. D.D. Bhargava

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-29-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 196A

Reported in : 17(1980)DLT251

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mulla; Bishambar Lal,; B.L. Mehta and; P.P. Malhotra

Leila Seth, J. (1) This Criminal revisiopetition is directed against the Orders dated 12th January, 1973 and 23rd March, 1974 passed by the then Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate and the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, respectively, dismissing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2005

Abbas Kasam Naddaf (Since Deceased Through His Heirs: Smt. Anwar Abbas ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-26-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; ;Bombay Rent Act - Sections 28; Constitution of India - Article 227; Provincial Small Causes Court Act, 1987

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR258; 2005(6)BomCR881; 2005(4)MhLj424

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mulla, Adv.

Anoop V. Mohta, J. 1. The Petitioners-tenants, legal heirs of original defendant No. 1 have invoked Article 227 of the Constitution of India and sought to challenge the judgment and order passed by the Additional District...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1958

Thannoo Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-06-1958

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304

Reported in : AIR1959All131; 1959CriLJ158

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Mulla, Adv.

R.K. Chowdhry, J. 1. This is an appeal by one Thannoo aged 20 against his conviction by the learned Sessions judge of Budaun under Section 304, I.P.C., and the sentence of nine years' R. I. passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1964

Kedarnath Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-20-1964

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405 and 409

Reported in : AIR1965All233; 1965CriLJ539

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Mulla and ;Bhagwat Pd. Gupta, Advs.

ORDERSatish Chandra, J. 1. This is a revision by one Kedar Nath against his conviction under Section 409, I. P. C. and sentence of three years' rigorous imprisonment.2. In the district of Deoria there is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial