Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a n haksar · Page 1 of about 162 results (0.072 seconds)

Nov 13 2002

Keramos (Through Its Proprietor Shri Vikram Chopra) Vs. Customs, Excis ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AA, 11AC, 35F and 173Q; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944

Reported in : 2003(87)ECC504; 2003(153)ELT301(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. and; R. Sudhinder, Adv

D.K. Jain, J.Rule D.B.1. An order dated 28 December 2001, passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act), directing the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2002

Modipon Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-17-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1)

Reported in : 2003(85)ECC790; 2002(146)ELT45(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv.,; Veronica Mohan and; Rohina Nath

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. The petitioners have preferred a writ petition before this Court with manifold prayers, but the principal grievance of the petitioners is that the benefits which were given to them by Notification dated 23.4.1980...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2008

Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc. Vs. Indian Mri Diagnostic and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-29-2008

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 36A and 36A(1); Rating Act, 1971 - Sections 2(3); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1984; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : AIR2009SC1052; 2008BusLR986(SC); (2008)4CompLJ347(SC); 2008(13)SCALE1; (2008)10SCC227; [2008]88SCL10(SC):2009AIRSCW197

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv.,; Rashmi Virmani and; Rajeev K. Virman

Markandey Katju, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals have been filed against the judgment and final order dated 29.11.2005 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi in Restrictive Trade Practices Enquiry No. 172...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

May 29 2013

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Mr. Shailendra Singh, Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Mr. A.N. Haksar, Mr. Shiv Sapra, Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Mr. Sumesh Dhawan

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2013

Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 17 1998

interarch Building Products Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-17-1998

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(105)ELT377TriDel

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.N. Haksar

1. These are 12 Appeals involving the same issue, namely, the interpretation of Notification No. 11/97-Cus., dated 1-3-1997. By the impugned order, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had denied the appellants the benefit of the Notification.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 29 2013