Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a n haksar and · Page 1 of about 162 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 13 2002

Keramos (Through Its Proprietor Shri Vikram Chopra) Vs. Customs, Excis ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AA, 11AC, 35F and 173Q; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944

Reported in : 2003(87)ECC504; 2003(153)ELT301(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. and; R. Sudhinder, Adv

D.K. Jain, J.Rule D.B.1. An order dated 28 December 2001, passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act), directing the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2002

Modipon Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-17-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1)

Reported in : 2003(85)ECC790; 2002(146)ELT45(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv.,; Veronica Mohan and; Rohina Nath

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. The petitioners have preferred a writ petition before this Court with manifold prayers, but the principal grievance of the petitioners is that the benefits which were given to them by Notification dated 23.4.1980...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2008

Philips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc. Vs. Indian Mri Diagnostic and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-29-2008

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 36A and 36A(1); Rating Act, 1971 - Sections 2(3); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1984; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : AIR2009SC1052; 2008BusLR986(SC); (2008)4CompLJ347(SC); 2008(13)SCALE1; (2008)10SCC227; [2008]88SCL10(SC):2009AIRSCW197

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv.,; Rashmi Virmani and; Rajeev K. Virman

Markandey Katju, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals have been filed against the judgment and final order dated 29.11.2005 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi in Restrictive Trade Practices Enquiry No. 172...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 22 2006

Gujrat Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. the Mrtp Commission and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-22-2006

Subject : MRTP

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 10, 12, 33(1) and 36B; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 19, Rule 3; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Regulations - Regulations 65 and 68

Reported in : [2006]134CompCas482(Delhi); [2006]72SCL363(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. and; U.A. Rana,; Arvind Kumar and

S. Muralidhar, J.1. This writ petition challenges the orders dated 9.1.2004 and 13.12.2004 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Commission, New Delhi (hereafter 'MRTP Commission') in RTPE No. 21 of 2001. By the first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1987

Naga People's Movement for Human Rights (NPMHR) Vs. Union of India (UO ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-28-1987

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 361; Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Advocate for Appellant : G. Mukhoty, N. Haksar, H. Roy and B.D. Das, Advs.

Saikia, C.J. 1. The Senapati District of Manipur, hereinafter referred to as the 'the district, having been declared as a disturbed area under Section 3 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 1996

J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-10-1996

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT785TriDel

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12/13-7-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Jaipur by which he has disallowed the Modvat credit on capital goods Rs. 32,00,151.80 under Rule 57U...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2010

Gas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. thermax Ltd. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-30-2010

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 and 34(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 74

Advocate for Appellant : Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv.,; Navin Kumar and; Surbhi Agarwa

Manmohan, J.1. Present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1996') challenging the arbitral Award dated 30th March, 2002 passed by Mr. V. Selvaraj,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 1995

Art Rubber Industries Ltd. Vs. Coll. of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-15-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(81)ELT389TriDel

1. The captioned appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal passed by the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals). The Collector (Appeals) in his order had held : "5. I have gone through the order-in-original, the appeal petition and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2003

Sheela Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-01-2003

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2003)(154)ELT381TriDel

1. The appellant in appeal No. E/1341/2001-A which was allowed by this Tribunal by Final Order dated 12-2-2002 filed a Miscellaneous Applications Nos. E/M/389, 390 & 391/2002-A on 23-10-2002 seeking directions to the respondent to implement...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1994

Director-general of Vs. Deepak Fertilizers and

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Aug-11-1994

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1994)81CompCas341NULL

1. This Full Bench was constituted to determine certain preliminary objections raised in each of these enquiries and the compensation application. As the preliminary objections raised are identical, we are disposing of the same by means...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial