Advanced Search Results
Keramos (Through Its Proprietor Shri Vikram Chopra) Vs. Customs, Excis ...
Delhi
Nov-13-2002
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11AA, 11AC, 35F and 173Q; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944
2003(87)ECC504; 2003(153)ELT301(Del)
A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. and; R. Sudhinder, Adv
D.K. Jain, J.Rule D.B.1. An order dated 28 December 2001, passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act), directing the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskModipon Limited and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
May-17-2002
Constitution
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1)
2003(85)ECC790; 2002(146)ELT45(Del)
A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv.,; Veronica Mohan and; Rohina Nath
Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. The petitioners have preferred a writ petition before this Court with manifold prayers, but the principal grievance of the petitioners is that the benefits which were given to them by Notification dated 23.4.1980...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhilips Medical Systems (Cleveland) Inc. Vs. Indian Mri Diagnostic and ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-29-2008
MRTP
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 36A and 36A(1); Rating Act, 1971 - Sections 2(3); Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1984; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (Amendment) Act, 1991
AIR2009SC1052; 2008BusLR986(SC); (2008)4CompLJ347(SC); 2008(13)SCALE1; (2008)10SCC227; [2008]88SCL10(SC):2009AIRSCW197
A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv.,; Rashmi Virmani and; Rajeev K. Virman
Markandey Katju, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals have been filed against the judgment and final order dated 29.11.2005 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi in Restrictive Trade Practices Enquiry No. 172...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gujrat Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. the Mrtp Commission and ors.
Delhi
Aug-22-2006
MRTP
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 10, 12, 33(1) and 36B; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 19, Rule 3; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Regulations - Regulations 65 and 68
[2006]134CompCas482(Delhi); [2006]72SCL363(Delhi)
A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. and; U.A. Rana,; Arvind Kumar and
S. Muralidhar, J.1. This writ petition challenges the orders dated 9.1.2004 and 13.12.2004 passed by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Commission, New Delhi (hereafter 'MRTP Commission') in RTPE No. 21 of 2001. By the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaga People's Movement for Human Rights (NPMHR) Vs. Union of India (UO ...
Guwahati
Oct-28-1987
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 361; Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10
G. Mukhoty, N. Haksar, H. Roy and B.D. Das, Advs.
Saikia, C.J. 1. The Senapati District of Manipur, hereinafter referred to as the 'the district, having been declared as a disturbed area under Section 3 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958, hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-10-1996
Excise
(1996)(88)ELT785TriDel
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12/13-7-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Jaipur by which he has disallowed the Modvat credit on capital goods Rs. 32,00,151.80 under Rule 57U...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGas Authority of India Ltd. Vs. thermax Ltd. and anr.
Delhi
Apr-30-2010
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 and 34(2); ;Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 74
Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv.,; Navin Kumar and; Surbhi Agarwa
Manmohan, J.1. Present petition has been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1996') challenging the arbitral Award dated 30th March, 2002 passed by Mr. V. Selvaraj,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArt Rubber Industries Ltd. Vs. Coll. of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-15-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(81)ELT389TriDel
1. The captioned appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal passed by the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals). The Collector (Appeals) in his order had held : "5. I have gone through the order-in-original, the appeal petition and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheela Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-01-2003
MRTP
(2003)(154)ELT381TriDel
1. The appellant in appeal No. E/1341/2001-A which was allowed by this Tribunal by Final Order dated 12-2-2002 filed a Miscellaneous Applications Nos. E/M/389, 390 & 391/2002-A on 23-10-2002 seeking directions to the respondent to implement...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirector-general of Vs. Deepak Fertilizers and
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Aug-11-1994
MRTP
(1994)81CompCas341NULL
1. This Full Bench was constituted to determine certain preliminary objections raised in each of these enquiries and the compensation application. As the preliminary objections raised are identical, we are disposing of the same by means...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »