Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a muthukumar · Page 1 of about 415 results (0.077 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 25 1997

Abdul Fatha and Another Vs. Villayudham and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-25-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 -- Sections 8, 8(4) and 8(5), 9, 10(2)(1) and 25

Reported in : 1998(2)CTC627; (1998)IIIMLJ237

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Muthukumar, Adv.

ORDER1. These revisions have been filed by the defeated tenants against the order of eviction passed against them and against the order confirming the decision of the Rent Controller dismissing their application under Section 9 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2001

S. Mohammad Ali Vs. Basheer Ahmed, Rep. by His Power Agent Abdul Kalam ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 8A(2) - Order 13, Rules 1, 2 and 3

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ812

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Muthukumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The revision petitioner is the petitioner in I.A. No. 397 of 1999 and the third defendant in O.S.No.32 of 1998 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai.2. Before the settlement of issues...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2006

Management of Akkur Primary Agricultural Co-op. Bank Ltd., Rep. by Its ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-05-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 1(2), 1(3), 5(1), 6, 41, 41(2), 50 and 51; Madras District Municipalities Act, 1920; Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950

Reported in : (2007)IILLJ959Mad

Advocate for Appellant : A. Muthukumar, Adv.

K. Chandru, J.1. This writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated June 28, 2006 made in W.P. No. 17285 of 2001.2. The appellant is a Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society functioning...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 03 2009

A. Raja Mohammad and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Minnalkodi an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-03-2009

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(14), 2(44), 2(46), 95, 140, 147, 149, 163A and 166; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1994; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ449

Advocate for Appellant : A. Muthukumar, Adv. in CMA 73/2002 and ;M.B. Gopalan, Adv. in CMA 948/2002

P.R. Shivakumar, J.1. These two civil miscellaneous appeals arise out of the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Perambalur dated 21.08.2001 made in M.C.O.P. No. 316/1999. The first respondent (owner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 2007

The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, (Vpm Dvn ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-16-2007

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2008ACJ1799; (2007)6MLJ960

Advocate for Appellant : S. Geetha, Adv. for ;R. Balakrishnan, Adv. in C.M.A. No. 868/01 and ;A. Muthukumar, Adv. in C.M.A. No. 145/01

S. Manikumar, J.1. In an accident which occurred on 09.05.1998, the claimant sustained fracture of left leg, which was subsequently amputated. He claimed compensation of Rs. 9,00,000/-. The Tribunal on evaluation of pleadings and evidence awarded...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 2000

Bhanumathy Agencies Vs. Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-07-2000

Subject : BankingContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 69 and 70

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas454(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Muthukumar, Adv. for ;M. Kandasamy, Adv.

F.M. Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.1. The second defendant is the appellant. The first respondent filed a suit in O. S. No. 61 of 1985 on the file of the District Judge, Nilgiris, Ootacamund, against the appellant and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1997

Sree Visalam Chit Funds Ltd., Through Its Manager Vs. T.V. Kumar and 2 ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-03-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 4 and 19; Chit Funds Act, 1982 - Sections 33; Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Schedule - Article 49

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC284; (1997)IMLJ438

Advocate for Appellant : A. Muthukumar, Adv.

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J.1. When the above civil revision petition came up for admission before this Court, notice of motion returnable by four weeks was ordered by this Court on 19-11-1996. Though both the respondents were duly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2013

G.Ramesh Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-30-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.09.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.17701 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 G.Ramesh ..Petitioner versus 1.State rep. By The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1999

R. Jayakumar Vs. P. Kaliyaperumal and 2 Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-1999

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants (Payment of Fair Rent) Act, 1956 - Sections 3(2); Tamil Nadu Record of Tenancy Rights Act, Sections 5; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Sections 108

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC202

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Muthukumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The landlord in the application filed by the tenants for fixation of fair rent under the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants (Payment of Fair Rent) Act, 1956 is the revision petitioner. The respondents in this revision...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2003

S. Veerakumar Vs. State Bank of India by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-28-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act; Pension Rules - Rule 8; State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules - Rules 2(2), 7, 8, 20 and 22; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 19; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules - Rule 49; Border Security Border Rules - Rule 19; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ138Mad

Advocate for Appellant : J. Radhakrishnan, Adv. for ;A. Muthukumar & P.Nareshkumar

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the respondents relating to the payment of pension to the petitioner and quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial