Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a m suri · Page 1 of about 438 results (0.106 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 29 1965

Krishan Kumar Grover Vs. Smt. Parmeshri Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-29-1965

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 105 and 115; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 - Schedule - Article 17; Suits Valuation Act, 1887 - Sections 8

Reported in : AIR1967P& H389

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Suri,; C.M. Nayar and; S.M. Suri, Advs.

ORDERS.B. Capoor, J.1. The question for decision before the Full Bench is--Whether a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. is competent at the instance of a plaintiff against an order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 1999

Haryana Telecom Limited Vs. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-07-1999

Subject : Company Arbitration

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 397, 398, 433, 434, 439, 446(2) and 483; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas675(P& H); (1999)122PLR116

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. This is an appeal under section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1956 Act'), against the order dated January 22, 1998, passed by the learned company judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1994

Gurcharan Singh Vs. Raghbir Cycles Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-19-1994

Subject : CompanyArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155 and 433

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas203(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : H.L. Sibal,; L.M. Suri, Senior Advs. and; Deepak Suri

V.K. Bali, J. 1. This order shall dispose of Company Application No. 46 of 1993 in Company Petition No. 134 of 1987, and Company Application No. 47 of 1993 in Company Petition No. 79 of 1987...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2006

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Bimla Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-08-2006

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2007ACJ28; (2006)143PLR415

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Sr. Adv. and; Neeraj Khanna, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J. 1. An accident took place on June 9, 1996 between Jeep bearing registration No. DL-5C-A-8789 and the truck bearing registration No. HR-39-0121. As a result of the aforesaid accident, Roshan Lal a passenger...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1982

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Col. Gurcharan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-29-1982

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95, 95(2) and 103A

Reported in : [1986]59CompCas15(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Adv.

I.S. Tiwana, J. 1. The three Letters Patent Appeals Nos. 323 to 325 of 1978 are directed against the same judgment of the learned single judge and are thus being disposed of together. The facts which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 18 1999

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Indu Sharma and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Nov-18-1999

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 149 and 163A

Reported in : I(2000)ACC536; 2000ACJ808; (2000)124PLR417

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Sr. Adv. and; Deepak Suri, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. This is a Civil Revision filed by the National Insurance Company Limited through its Regional Manager and has been directed against the respondents mentioned in the Head Note of the memorandum of parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2005

State Bank of India Vs. Punjab National Fertiliser Chemical Ltd. (In L ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-24-2005

Subject : CompanySICA

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 457(1), 529 and 529A; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20, 20(4) and 32; Companies (Courts) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9, 272, 273 and 274

Reported in : III(2005)BC447; [2006]134CompCas258(P& H); (2005)140PLR228

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Suri, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This order shall dispose of C.A. No. 136 of 2003 in which prayer has been made by the State Bank of India on behalf of the secured creditors of the respondent company namely,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1992

Samiti Khanna Vs. Aroon Khanna

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-09-1992

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : II(1992)DMC86; (1992)102PLR293

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Sr. Adv. and; Deepak Suri, Adv.

A.P. Chowdhri, J.1. This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated January 8, 1991, of the Additional District Judge; Karnal, allowing respondent's petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 10 1980

Haryana State Electricity Board Vs. Smt. Pushpa Chadha and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-10-1980

Subject : Insurance

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(1)

Reported in : [1984]55CompCas421(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Adv.

1. This is an appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent filed by theHaryana state Electricity Board against the judgment dated the 21st of February, 1980, passed by the learned single judge of this court....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2005

Winsome Yarns Ltd. Vs. Punjab Wireless Systems Limited (In Liquidation ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-06-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 433, 434, 447, 455, 529, 529(1), 529(3), 529A and 530; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6, 9, 272 and 273; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : [2006]129CompCas41(P& H); (2005)141PLR689

Advocate for Appellant : L.M. Suri, Sr. Adv. and; Deepak Suri and; Neeraj Khanna

Virender Singh, J.1. This is hotly contested matter anent the post-auction jurisdiction of Company Judge to set aside a confirmed sale on the basis of a higher offer.2. The facts of the case are set down...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial