Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a m mathur · Page 1 of about 239 results (0.058 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 31 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gangotri Tube Wells (P.) Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [1998]229ITR87(MP); [1998]95TAXMAN162(MP)

A. R. TIWARI J. - At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bhopal, the Tribunal has stated the case and referred the undernoted questions labelled as of law, arising out of the order dated January...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 1994

Dr. Umrao Singh Choudhary Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-22-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 162; Administrative Law; Madhya Pradesh Vishwa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 4, 13, 14, 22, 23, 24, 25, 40, 47, 50, 52(1), 52(3), 52(4) and 68

Reported in : AIR1995MP75

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur, Senior Adv. and ;P. Mathur, Adv.

V.D. Gyani, J. 1. Judicial review of Staleaction by way of certiorari has been invokedby none else than the Vice-Chancellor of DeviAhilya Vishwavidhalaya, Indore. This Courtis faced with a dispute in which academicadministrative law, delegated legislation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bhagirath and Bros. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256, 256(1) and 256(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 3, Rules 4(1) and 6(2) - Order 9, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 48, Rule 1(1)

Reported in : [1997]225ITR483(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;Vivek Sharan, Advs.

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. The identical relief of restoration, structured and spun on the identical ground of non-availability of senior counsel due to his having gone out of country at the relevant dates of dismissal of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 19 1989

Raj Pack Well Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-19-1989

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act; Textiles Committee Act, 1963 - Sections 2; Central Excise Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Textile (Control) Order, 1986

Reported in : 1993(41)ECC285; 1993LC351(MP); 1990(50)ELT201(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;I.C. Upadhyay, Advs.

A.G. Qureshi, J.1. The petitioners in this petition are limited companies registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, having their offices at Indore and factories at Pithampur, district Dhar. The petitioners are manufacturing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 10 2000

Procter and Gamble Home Products Ltd. Vs. C.C. and C. Ex.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-10-2000

Subject : ExciseConstitution

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(1), 4(4), 11A, 11A(1) and 20; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Act; Central Excise Valuation Rules, 1975 - Rules 7 and 10; Administrative Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(128)ELT330(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The factual matrix, the questions raised, the points of law urged and the relief claimed being interlinked, both the writ petitions were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order. For...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1995

Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sahakari Bank Maryadit Vs. Vijaysingh Solanki and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 41

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ106MP; 1996(0)MPLJ547

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;Vivek Saran, Advs.

R.D. Shukla, J.1. By this order following .L.P As. are being disposed of. The Bank has filed appeal against 24 petitioners who have also filed separate appeals. As such, appeals filed by both the parties are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 1994

Steel Furnace Association of India and ors. Vs. M.P. Electricity Board ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-20-1994

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ704

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;A.K. Shrivastava, Advs.

ORDERA.R. Tiwari, J.1. This order shall also govern the disposal of the connected other 12 petitions particularised as -(1) M. P. No. 1859/92 (M/s Madhumilan v. MPEB), (2) M. P. No. 1871/92 (M/s Chirag v. MPEB),...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1994

Mandu Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Pradushan Niw ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-1994

Subject : Environment

Acts : Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 - Sections 33(A); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1995MP57

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur, Sr. Counsel and ;Shrivastava, Adv.

ORDER1. This order also governs the disposal of M. P. No. 2037/93 (Kedia Leather v. The M. P. Pradushan Niyantran Board). M.P. No. 692/92(Kedia Leather v. The M. P. Pradushan Niyantran Board), M. P. No. 2129/93...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1980

Saraswatibai Vs. Durga Sahai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-01-1980

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 151 - Order 1, Rules 8 and 10 - Order 41, Rule 20

Reported in : AIR1982MP147

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur, Adv.

H.G. Mishra, J. 1. This is second appeal by the plaintiff against judgment and decree dated 11-9-1973, passed by the Second Additional District Judge, Indore, whereby appeal preferred against judgment and decree passed by the trial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 1996

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sharadaprasad Motilal and Brothers

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-18-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)

Reported in : [1998]229ITR647(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;A.K. Shrivastava, Advs.

A.R. Tiwari, J.1. The applicant-Revenue has filed this application under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), seeking a direction to the Tribunal to state the case and refer the questions,as extracted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial