Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a law · Page 1 of about 569,890 results (2.955 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 1996

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-17-1996

Subject : Other Taxes

Bisheshwar Prasad Singh, J.1. In this batch of writ petitions the issues involved being identical, they have been heard together, and are being disposed of by this common judgment. In all the write petitions the petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 1988

The Registrar, High Court Vs. C.B.S. Naidu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-1988

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ66

Mohan, J.1. The Writ Appeal arises under the following circumstances: The respondent herein was enrolled as an Advocate on 6.10.1960. He practised in this Court for about 13 years. He was appointed as Assistant State Prosecutor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Dr. Giridhar Kamalpurkar Vs. Dr. Venugopal Ram Rao and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology Memorandum of Association, 1983 - Clause 3(23); Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology Rules and Regulations, 1983 - Rules 10(4), 12, 18(1) and 19; Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology (Pay, Recruitments, Conditions of Services and Miscellaneous Provisions) Rules, 1987 - Rules 2, 3(6), 7 and 15; Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960 - Sections 6, 8, 9 and 10; Constitution of India - Article 12; Karnataka Medical Services (Teaching and Technical Personnel in Medical and Dental Colleges) Recruitment Rules - 1964

Reported in : 2001(3)KarLJ467

Advocate for Appellant : Sri S. Vijaya Shankar and ;Sri U.L. Bhat, Sr. Advs., ;Sri K. Srinivasa Gowda, Additional Government Adv., ;Sri S.M. Chandrashekar, ;Sri P.R. Ramesh, ;Sri P.N. Kathavi, and ;Sri K. Gopal Hegde, A

1. The controversies, contentions and claims raised in these writ appeals and connected writ petitions/appeals centres around three service cadres of Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiology (in short the 'Institute'). These cadres are of (i) Assistant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 1999

Housing and Urban Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-31-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, - Sections, 2(3, 24 and 37), 113, 114, 115(4), 116(2), 119 and 120; Governments Grants Act, 1895

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)792; 81(1999)DLT742; 1999(51)DRJ614

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. B.B. Jain Adv

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. The point at issue as raised by the Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited (in short HUDCO) is; whether HUDCO is exempt from levy of property tax on the land allotted to it...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1994

Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. Vs. Lazor Detergents (P.) Ltd. and ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-1994

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81, 82, 108, 108(1), (A) and (H), 111, 111(4) and 155; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 22(A), (A(3)), (A(4)) and (A(6)); MRTP Act, 1969 - Sections 30(A) and (G)

Reported in : [1994]81CompCas669(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Vedantham Srinivasan, ;K. Parasaran, ;C.A. Sundaram, ;K.P. Sivasubramaniam, ;N. Kumar and ;P. Seshadri, Advs.

Swamidurai, J. 1. These appeals are filed against the common order dated October 20, 1993, passed by the Company Law Board, Southern Region Bench at Madras, in C.P. Nos. 1 to 11/111/SRB of 1993. The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 15 2005

Sharadamma and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-15-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4(2) 5(7A), 11, 14, 15, 15(2), 16, 16(2), 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 18, 18(1), 18(3), 19, 19(1), 28 to 32, 91, 92, 31, 36, 36(1), 36(3), 38, 38A, 64(1), 64(2), 67, 81A, 81B and 127(1); Karnataka Land Acquisition (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 9 and 10; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 63(7), 79A, 83, 95, 95(3), 95(4) and 109; Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(4), 4A, 4A(1), 4A(3), 69(2) and 81B; Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 - Sections 177, 503A, 503B and 503B(2); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5A, 5A(2), 6, 9, 10, 16 and 16(2); Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 159(4); Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 309 an

Reported in : ILR2005KAR3710; 2005(4)KarLJ481

Advocate for Appellant : Jayaraj and Associates in W.P. Nos. 848-50 of 2005, ;Lawyers Inc in W.P. Nos. 260, 1986 and 1987-88 of 2005 and 10731-53, 41262-66, 42876-89 and 44374 of 2004, ;Lex Nexus, Adv. in W.P. No. 51461 of 20

ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. These batches of writ petitions are filed by the owners of agricultural and/or converted lands, house sites, residential/farm houses, companies and builders and others questioning the legality, validity and correctness of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1992

Oil and Natural Gas Commission Vs. Offshore Enterprises Inc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-18-1992

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3 - Rules 2 and 4 - Order XIX - Rule 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 31, 34(1) and 49; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 9, 10 and 13; Bombay High Court Rules - Rules 9 and 13

Reported in : AIR1993Bom217; 1993(2)BomCR618; (1993)95BOMLR396; 1993(1)MhLj243

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Chagla and ;D.J. Khambata, Advs. i/b ;B. Munim and Co. and ;G.E. Vahanvati and ;P.A. Savant, Advs. i/b ;Gagrat and Co., for ;Incorporated Law Society, ;A.P. Shah, Adv.

1. While hearing Arbitration Petition No. 210 of 1989, I found that Shri Atul Munim and Shri Pramod Dalai, Partners of Messrs. Bachubhai Munim and Co., a firm of Advocates, had filed their own affidavits as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2006

Vikrant Tyres Limited represented by Its General Manager (Personnel) V ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-14-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1) and 46; Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Bombay Industrial Relations Act; Factories Rules - Rules 93 and 99

Reported in : 2007(1)SLJ352(NULL)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Murthy and ;Somashekar, Advs.

ORDERAnand Byrareddy, J.1. The facts of the case are:The petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of tyres. The petitioner had employed over 2000 workmen and over 400 officers. The petitioner has a canteen. This is as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1997

Sakatar Singh Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-18-1997

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 306, 304B and 498A

Reported in : II(1997)DMC328

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Bali and; B.S. Bindra, Sr. Advs.,; D.V. Gupta a

A.S. Nehra, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated April 27, 1987, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala, by which Kirpal Singh, Sakatar Singh and Joginder Kaur, appellants, were convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 1997

Sandeep Goyal and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-12-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439(1) and 439(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149, 307, 364 and 506

Reported in : 1998CriLJ507

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Walia, Adv.

ORDERR.L. Anand, J.1. Sarvshri Sandeep Goyal-(informant) and Dildar Singh (injured) have filed the present petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for the cancellation of the bail granted to respondent No. 2...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial