Advanced Search Results
Manav Hitkari Sangh Vs. Rajkumar Singh
Rajasthan
Jul-14-2000
Labour and Industrial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Rajasthan Societies Registration Act, 1958 - Sections 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 136 and 311; ;Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965; Bank Act, 1964; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1985; Contract Act - Sections 23
(2002)IVLLJ809Raj; 2001(1)WLC618
Amod Kasliwal, Adv.
Madan, J. 1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 5.4.1999 of the Addt. District Judge No. 8, Jaipur City, whereby he quashed order dated 4.3.1999 of the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.) Jaipur City...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathu Ram Agrawal Vs. Rajasthan Silicate and Glass Industries Private ...
Rajasthan
Jan-29-1988
Company
1988(1)WLN432
Shri. Anant Kasliwal
P.C. Jain, J.1. In this company petition under Sections 433, 334 and 439 of the Companies Act, petitioner Nathu Ram Agarwal has prayed that M/s Rajasthan Silicate and Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. be wound up and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrilokchand Bansilal Pande Vs. Syed TamiguddIn S/O Syed HafizuddIn Sin ...
Mumbai
Aug-28-1997
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 1, Rules 5 and 8 - Order 41, Rule 31; Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 - Sections 15(3)
1998(3)ALLMR840; 1998(3)BomCR176
A.H. Kasliwal, Adv.
ORDERR.G. Deshpande, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.2. Heard Shri A.M. Kasliwal, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.V. Gangapurwala, learned Counsel...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Ramdhan
Rajasthan
Sep-26-1972
PropertyConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Rajasthan Colonisation (Rajasthan Canal Project Government Land Allotment and Sale) Rules, 1967 - Rules 7 and 19; Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954
AIR1973Raj71; 1972()WLN839
G.C. Kasliwal, Former Adv. General
Beri, J.1. These 268 special appeals indicated in the Annexure I to this judgment preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the judgments of the learned single Judge, of different dates though of identical contents, whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Gyan Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Rajasthan
Jul-18-1978
Media and CommunicationCivil
Constitution of India - Articles 19, 31, 226 and 226(3); Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 5 and 5A; Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1959 - Rule 16 and 16(1)
AIR1979Raj5
G.C. Kasliwal and; S.K. Keshote, Advs.
ORDERG.M. Lodha, J.1. This writ petition has been filed against the order of the Collector, Jaipur, dated 25th May, 1976 by which the petitioner Smt. Gyan Devi's application for grant of 'no objection certificate' under the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNathu Lal Vs. Nathi Bai
Rajasthan
Mar-01-1997
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13(1)
I(1997)DMC598
Ravi Kasliwal, Adv.
A.K. Parihar, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 24.2.1993 passed by Family Court, Kota by which application filed by the appellant Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been rejected...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Rajasthan Steel Rolling Mills (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Apr-29-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN194(Raj)
R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue A. Kasliwal, for the Assessee
On an application under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :For assessment years 1983-84 to11985-86 :'Whether on the facts and in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCwt Vs. Kedar Nath
Rajasthan
Jul-03-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN141(Raj)
R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue Anant Kasliwal, for the Assessee
ORDEROn an application under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred following questions for our opinion :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Ruby Trading Co. (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Jul-09-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]124TAXMAN186(Raj)
J.K. Singhi and Anuroop Singhi, for the Revenue Anant Kasliwal, for the Assessee
ORDERY.R. Meena, J. On an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following questions for our opinion:'1. Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Elegant Homes (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Aug-06-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)177CTR(Raj)261
R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue Anant Kasliwal, for the Assessee
By the CourtThe present appeal had been admitted in terms of the following questions :'1. Whether the judgment passed by the learned Tribunal suffers from the perversity or not ?2. Whether the learned Tribunal was right...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »