Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a kasliwal · Page 1 of about 919 results (0.152 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 14 2000

Manav Hitkari Sangh Vs. Rajkumar Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-14-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Rajasthan Societies Registration Act, 1958 - Sections 12; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 19(1), 136 and 311; ;Uttar Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1965; Bank Act, 1964; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1985; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : (2002)IVLLJ809Raj; 2001(1)WLC618

Advocate for Appellant : Amod Kasliwal, Adv.

Madan, J. 1. This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 5.4.1999 of the Addt. District Judge No. 8, Jaipur City, whereby he quashed order dated 4.3.1999 of the Civil Judge (Jr.Div.) Jaipur City...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1988

Nathu Ram Agrawal Vs. Rajasthan Silicate and Glass Industries Private ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-29-1988

Subject : Company

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN432

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Anant Kasliwal

P.C. Jain, J.1. In this company petition under Sections 433, 334 and 439 of the Companies Act, petitioner Nathu Ram Agarwal has prayed that M/s Rajasthan Silicate and Glass Industries Pvt. Ltd. be wound up and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1997

Trilokchand Bansilal Pande Vs. Syed TamiguddIn S/O Syed HafizuddIn Sin ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-28-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 1, Rules 5 and 8 - Order 41, Rule 31; Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 - Sections 15(3)

Reported in : 1998(3)ALLMR840; 1998(3)BomCR176

Advocate for Appellant : A.H. Kasliwal, Adv.

ORDERR.G. Deshpande, J.1. Rule, returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.2. Heard Shri A.M. Kasliwal, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.V. Gangapurwala, learned Counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 26 1972

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Ramdhan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-26-1972

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Rajasthan Colonisation (Rajasthan Canal Project Government Land Allotment and Sale) Rules, 1967 - Rules 7 and 19; Rajasthan Colonization Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR1973Raj71; 1972()WLN839

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Kasliwal, Former Adv. General

Beri, J.1. These 268 special appeals indicated in the Annexure I to this judgment preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the judgments of the learned single Judge, of different dates though of identical contents, whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 1978

Smt. Gyan Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-18-1978

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19, 31, 226 and 226(3); Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 5 and 5A; Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1959 - Rule 16 and 16(1)

Reported in : AIR1979Raj5

Advocate for Appellant : G.C. Kasliwal and; S.K. Keshote, Advs.

ORDERG.M. Lodha, J.1. This writ petition has been filed against the order of the Collector, Jaipur, dated 25th May, 1976 by which the petitioner Smt. Gyan Devi's application for grant of 'no objection certificate' under the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1997

Nathu Lal Vs. Nathi Bai

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-01-1997

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13 and 13(1)

Reported in : I(1997)DMC598

Advocate for Appellant : Ravi Kasliwal, Adv.

A.K. Parihar, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 24.2.1993 passed by Family Court, Kota by which application filed by the appellant Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been rejected...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2003

Cit Vs. Rajasthan Steel Rolling Mills (P) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-29-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]130TAXMAN194(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue A. Kasliwal, for the Assessee

On an application under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Tribunal has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :For assessment years 1983-84 to11985-86 :'Whether on the facts and in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2002

Cwt Vs. Kedar Nath

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-03-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]124TAXMAN141(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue Anant Kasliwal, for the Assessee

ORDEROn an application under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred following questions for our opinion :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2002

Cit Vs. Ruby Trading Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-09-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]124TAXMAN186(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : J.K. Singhi and Anuroop Singhi, for the Revenue Anant Kasliwal, for the Assessee

ORDERY.R. Meena, J. On an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the Tribunal has referred the following questions for our opinion:'1. Whether, on the facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2002

Cit Vs. Elegant Homes (P) Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-06-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)177CTR(Raj)261

Advocate for Appellant : R.B. Mathur, for the Revenue Anant Kasliwal, for the Assessee

By the CourtThe present appeal had been admitted in terms of the following questions :'1. Whether the judgment passed by the learned Tribunal suffers from the perversity or not ?2. Whether the learned Tribunal was right...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial