Advanced Search Results

Manohar Lal Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)68TTJ(NULL)27

Advocate for Appellant : K. M. Ranka & R.K. Yadav, for the Appellant R.N. Jangid, for the Respondent

ORDERB. M. Kothari, A.M.The assessee has raised the following grounds in this appeal-'(1) That the learned lower authorities grossly erred in applying a gross profit rate of 11 per cent and in making a trading addition...

Raghuraj Pratap Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 3(3), 4, 32, 32(1), 32(5), 34, 49, 49(6) to 49(9), 52 and 60; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and and Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 302, 320, 364 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 439; Arms Act; Explosives Act; Prevention of Terrorism Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT222

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, ;S.C. Datt, ;H.S. Dubey, ;C.D. Singh, ;Manish Datt, Advs. and ;Vijay Bahadur Singh, Sr. Adv.;P.R. Bhave, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Yadav and ;Anupan Mehrotra, Advs.

1. In this appeal preferred under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the POTA') the defensibility and pregnability of the order dated 29-11-2005 passed by the Special Court under the POTA...

Rejendra Prasad Vs. Regional Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad and ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1998)3UPLBEC1933

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Yadav, Adv.

O.P. Garg, J.1. Heard Sri A.K. Yadav, learned Counsel for the petitioner.2. The date of birth of the petitioner in the High School certificate, it is alleged has been wrongly mentioned as 10.2.1976 while it should...

M.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pandey Construction Co.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2); Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 - Sections 3, 7, 7A, 7B, 7B(2A), 9, 10, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 19(1), 20, 22, 23, 24(1), 24(2), 42, 65, 84C and 211; Rent Control Act; Representation of People Act - Sections 81, 82, 86, 86(1) and 117; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28 and 28(4); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 19; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act - Sections 13(1), 13(5) and 13(6); Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(35); Rajasthan Premises Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1950 - Sections 13(4); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Ciminal Procedure Code - Sections 340, 342, 344, 345, 34

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT206; 2005(2)MPLJ550

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Jaiswal, Sr. Adv. and ;R.S. Jaiswal, Adv. in C.R. No. 633/2003, ;V.R. Rao, Adv. in C.R. No. 1000/2003, ;Sanjay K. Yadav, Govt. Adv. in C.R. Nos. 1330/2003 and 151/2004 and ;Mohd. Nasir, Adv. in C

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. In C.R. No. 1330/2003 question has been referred for consideration of Larger Bench as to applicability of Section 5 of Limitation Act to a revision preferred under Section 19 of M.P. Madhyastham Adhikaran...

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226

Reported in : 2004(2)MPHT416

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.;Party-in-Person

Dipak Misra, J. 1. The petitioner, hardly two scores and tour, being public spirited, knocked at the doors of this Court as pro bono publico, being moved by the catastrophe and cataclysm of the earthquake that...

Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (2001)2UPLBEC1659

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Yadav, Adv.

V.M. Sahai, J.1. Heard Sri A.K. Yadav the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhinay Upadhyaya the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has stated...

Ram Raji @ Rana Ji Lal and anr. Vs. Smt. Maya Devi and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148

Reported in : (2005)140PLR862

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Yadav, Adv.

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 13.8.1994 passed by the Sub Judge Ist Class, Rohtak vide which the possession of the land in dispute has been ordered to be re-delivered...

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Noor Jama Khan and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 - Rule 42; Constitution of India - Articles 227 and 311

Reported in : 2002(5)MPHT37; 2002(3)MPLJ147

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Yadav, Govt. Adv.

ORDER1. Invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners namely, State of Madhya Pradesh and the Director, Town and Country Planning have called in question the sustainability...

M/s. Rohini S. Kurghode and Others Vs. M/s. E. Merck (I) Limited and A ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

1. The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked against the judgment and order dated 23.12.1999 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court, Thane, by which,...

Committee of Management Kalyankari Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya Throu ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salary to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3649

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Yadav, Adv.

S.K. Singh, J.1. Heard Sri S. K. Yadav, learned Advocate in support of this petition and Sri Alam, learned Standing Counsel in opposition thereof.2. Prayer in this petition is for quashing the order dated 13.8.1998 (annexure...