Advanced Search Results

Cit Vs. Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)198CTR(All)590

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Upadhayay, for the Assessee None, for the Revenue

Rajesh Kumar, J.The Tribunal, has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act'), for the assessment year 1989-90 for opinion to this Court :'1....

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Bansi Lal Agarwal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth-tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7, 7(4) and 27(1)

Reported in : (2006)202CTR(All)258

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Upadhayay, for the Revenue

1. The Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, has referred following question of law for the opinion of this Court under Section 27(1) of the WT Act:Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Das Industries

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 132, 143(1), 148 and 256(1)

Reported in : (2005)199CTR(All)370

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Upadhayay, Adv. and ;S.C.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as' Act') for the assessment year 1981-82 and 1982-83...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. the Bajpur Co-op. Sugar Factory Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct TaxationTrusts and Societies

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 251 and 256(1); Income Tax Rules, 1962

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(All)590

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Upadhayay, Adv. and ;S.C.

Rajes Kumar, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( hereinafter referred to as Act') for the assessment year 1989-90 for...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Sagar Mal Shambhoo Nath

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(31), 4(A), 5, 5(2), 70, 143, 144, 159(3), 159(6), 170, 182, 183, 184, 184(7), 184(8), 187, 187(1), 187(2), 188, 189 and 256(1); Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 3, 4, 23, 26, 30, 31 to 38, 39 to 55; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984; Predecessor Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23, 23(5), 25(1), 25(4), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 28 and 44; Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987; Income Tax Law

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(All)167; [2008]296ITR440(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Upadhyay, Adv.

Dilip Gupta, J.1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the '1961 Act') for opinion to...

Tulsi Ram Bhagwan Das Mandi Ghanshyamganj Vs. Commissioner of Income-t ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Dr. Satish Chandra, J. 1. The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 13.06.2005, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in I.T.A. No.160/Del/2005 for the assessment year 2001-02....

Ghaziabad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]287ITR473(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Rishi Raj Kapoor

1. By means of the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Ghaziabad Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., seeks the following relief:(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in...

Dr. Raksha Goswami D.O. Late S.D. Goswami Vs. State of U.P. Thru Chief ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Kumar, Adv

1. Heard Shri S.K.Kalia learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Sanjay Kumar learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Shri D.K.Upadhayay learned Chief Standing Counsel. 2. Controversy in question seems to be an instance...

Rajendra Singh Vs. Director of Education and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Delhi School Education Rules 1973 - Rule 117 (b) (ii); Delhi School Education Act, 1973; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kailash Vasdev; Mr. R.S. Hegde; Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advs.

1. The Petitioner seeks the quashing of an order dated 9th March 1994, passed by the Manager of the D.C. Arya Senior Secondary School („the School), Respondent No. 4 herein, compulsorily retiring the Petitioner from service...

A.K.Chopra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: Hon'ble ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Umesh Tripathi, Shri. T.K.Khadka, Shri. Akash Choudhury, Shri. N.K.Salunke, Shri. Mukesh Agrawal, Shri. Anoop Saxena, Shri. Rajesh Dubey, Shri. Saket Agrawal, Shri. V. Bhide, Shri. A.K.Singh, Shri. Vishal Dhagat, Shri. P.K.Pandey

W.P.No.8229/2012 13.01.2014 Shri Umesh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the respondents/State. (A.M.Khanwilkar) (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) Chief Justice Judge snb/- W.P.No.17419/2011 13.01.2014 Shri Rajendra Tiwari, learned Senior Advocate with...