Advanced Search Results

Sitabai Sinodia and ors. Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 - Rules 47(7) and 47(8); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5 and 11

Reported in : [2002(94)FLR1016]; 2002(3)MPHT277; 2002(3)MPLJ116

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Thakur, Adv.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J. 1. Shri Balram Prasad Sinodia (deceased) married Bindra Bai. Out of this wedlock, they had no child. He married Sita Bai Sinodia. Out of this marriage, there are three children : two sons...

Surat Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2 and 34

Reported in : 2003(3)ARBLR606(HP)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Sharma (Sr.), Adv. and; N.K. Thakur, Amicus Curiae

V.K. Gupta, C.J. 1. This reference in terms of Section 113 read with Order 46, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been made to this Court by the learned Senior Sub Judge, Shimla....

Tarabai Madhaorao Vs. Bombay Revenue Tribunal at Nagpur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Berar Regulation of Agricultural Leases Act, 1951 - Sections 8, 8(1)(G) , 9, 9(1), 9(3) to 9(9) and 19(2)

Reported in : AIR1959Bom72; (1959)61BOMLR41; ILR1959Bom560

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Thakur, Adv.

S.P. Kotval, J.1. The order in this Special Civil Application shall also govern the disposal of Special Civil Application No. 60 of 1958. The facts as also the points arising in both these Special Civil Applications...

Vimal Kumar Vs. Deshdiwaker and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : AIR2005MP37; 2004(4)MPLJ289

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Thakur, Adv.

A.K. Shrivastava, J. 1. This second appeal has been preferred by plaintiff having lost from both the Courts below.2. The plaintiff filed suit for damages to the tune of Rs. 7,000/- on account of defamatory statement...

Desh Raj and anr. Vs. Khushi Ram and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(14), 2(44), 2(46), 166 and 173

Reported in : 2006ACJ1926

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Thakur, Adv.

Deepak Gupta, J.1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act has been filed by the owners against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (2), Una in M.A.C. Petition No. 36 of...

Jagdev Singh Vs. Pheenu Ram Alias Ashwani Kumar and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (C.P.C) - Order 9 Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.K. Thakur, Adv.

1. This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the judgment dated 31.10.2008, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Una in Civil Appeal No. 13 of 2007. 2. Material facts necessary for adjudication...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kantabai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Reported in : 1991ACJ22

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Thakur and ;V.R. Thakur, Advs.

M.S. Deshpande, J.1. The original respondent No. 3 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Amravati in Claim Petition No. 18 of 1985 by this appeal challenges the decree passed jointly against it and the original respondent...

Bhartendra Singh Vs. Ramsahai Pandey and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 80, 83(1), 123, 123(3) and 123(5); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 19, Rule 3; Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules - Rule 4; Madhya Pradesh High Court Order; Constitution of India - Article 329

Reported in : AIR1972MP167

Advocate for Appellant : V.K.S. Choudhary and ;R.K. Thakur, Advs.

(On pre-liminary issues Nos. 8 (a) & (b). 9. 10. 11. 14 & 15).1. Issue Nos. 8 (a) and 8 (b) :--Shri Thakur the learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted that as the respondent No....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rameshwari Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2006ACJ232

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Thakur, Adv.

V.K. Gupta, C.J.1. By this common judgment all the three appeals are disposed of together.2. With the consent of the parties, all the appeals are taken up today for hearing and final disposal.3. The only two...

Saini and Co. Vs. Union of India

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]113TAXMAN55(NULL)

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Jain and N.K. Thakur, for the Assessee K.S. Rathore, M.S. Guleria, Vivek Thakur, Anand Sharma, Indar Singh and Vijay Thakur, for the Revenue

Thakker, C.J. This petition is placed before the Full Bench pursuant to an order dated 8-12-1999, passed by a Division Bench in CMP No. 439 of 1999. The said order reads as under:'Heard learned counsel for...