Advanced Search Results
Revajeethu Builders and Developers Vs. S. Vasudeva
Karnataka
Feb-15-1991
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 300A; ;Specific Relief Act - Sections 39; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 5, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 35, 36 and 46; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Rules
ILR1991KAR1417; 1991(1)KarLJ522
S. Ganesh, Adv. for ;V.S. Sadasivan, Adv., ;S. Vijayashankar, Adv., ;B.R.L. Iyengar, Adv. for ;A.K. Subbaiah, Adv. and ;Party-in-person
ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. These Appeals are directed against the Common Order dated 8-9-1989 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.Ps.Nos. 8546 to 8548 of 1988 connected with W.P.No.15377/1988, allowing the Writ Petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubramani Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
Oct-12-1995
CivilProperty
Karnataka Land Acquisition (Extension) (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 226
ILR1995KAR3139; 1995(6)KarLJ476
T.V. Lakshmi, Adv. for ;T.V. Venkanna, ;T. Venugopal and ;A.K. Subbaiah, Advs. and ;Party-in-Person
ORDERK.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. These Writ Petitions are preferred against certain acquisition of lands made under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short The L.A. Act') for the Karnataka State Judicial Department Employees' House Building Co-operative Society...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeneral Secretary, Linguistic Minorities Protection Committee and anr. ...
Karnataka
Jan-25-1989
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 29, 29(1), 30 and 30(1)
AIR1989Kant226; ILR1989KAR457
A.K. Subbaiah, ;Mohammed Farooq, ;V.K. Varadhachari, ;P. Vishwanatha Shetty, ;C.H. Jadhav and ;Basheer Hussain, Advs.
Rama, J.1. Seminal questions of National importance arise for consideration in these ten writ petitions presented by the Linguistic Minorities in the State, questioning the constitutional validity of the order of the State Government which makes...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Saraswati Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.
Karnataka
Feb-11-2004
Election
Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - Sections 134 and 138(3)
ILR2004KAR3111; 2004(2)KarLJ247
A.K. Subbaiah, Adv.
ORDERK. Bhakthavatsala, J.1. The petitioner is Before this Court praying for quashing the notification dated 17-11-2003 (Annexure-H) on the file of the 2nd respondent holding election to the post of Adhyaksha on 28-11-2003 and also declare...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. S. Gundiah Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-19-1987
Election
Karnataka Zilla Parishads, Taluk Panchayat Samithis Manual Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats Act, 1983 - Sections 139, 167(3), 170; Karnataka Zilla Parishads (Election of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha) Rules, 1987 - Rule 3
ILR1987KAR906
A. K. Subbaiah, Adv.
ORDERK.A. Swami, J.1. In this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Karnataka Zilla Parishads (Election of Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha) Rules, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL. Shivanna Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jun-30-1988
ElectionConstitution
Karnataka Zilla Parishads Taluk Panchayat Samithis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats Act, 1983 - Sections 27, 100, 139, 139(2) and 139(3) - Article 226, 429(b)
ILR1988KAR2121; 1989(1)KarLJ294
A.K. Subbaiah and ; H.K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advs.
ORDERRama Jois, J.1. In the first Writ Petition presented by a Member of the Zilla Parishad, Chickmagalur, the following important question of law arises for consideration;Whether a person who is not an elected member of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArokya Das Alias Das Chinnasavari and Others Vs. State of Karnataka an ...
Karnataka
Apr-08-1999
Election Constitution
Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 10, 11, 37, 38, 41, 42 and 316(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 243-U(1)
ILR2000KAR2794; 2000(5)KarLJ62
Sri A.K. Subbaiah, Adv.
ORDER1. The petitioners, in this petition, are the Councillors of the second respondent-Municipal Council.2. In this petition, the petitioners have called in question the correctness of the order dated 11th of January, 1999, a copy of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Radhamma Vs. S.M. Chandrashekhar
Karnataka
Jul-27-1998
Civil
Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964 - Sections 18; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115
1999(5)KarLJ404
Ms. Kavitha for ;Sri A.K. Subbaiah, Adv.
ORDER1. Heard Ms. Kavitha holding brief for Sri A.K. Subbaiah, learned Counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri K. Sachindra Karanth, learned Counsel for the respondent.2. The order challenged in this revision is dated 25-8-1993 directing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Ni Pra Channabasava Deshikendra Swamigalu Matadhipathigalu Vs. C.P ...
Karnataka
Jun-15-2009
PropertyTenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 10 and 43; Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 2(A), 2(B), 7, 10, 13, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 33, 36, 37, 39, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 41(9), 46A(5), 125, 126, 130 and 185; Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1979; Karnataka Certain Inams Abolition Act 1977 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Village Officers' Abolition Act, 1961 - Sections 8;Right to Information Act (RTI); Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 33, 34 and 39; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 40, Rule 1; Karnataka Land Reforms Rules - Rules 12 and 39
Jayakumar S. Patil, Sr. Counsel for; Jayakumar S. Patil,; G.S.V. Associates and; A.K. Subbaiah, Adv.
N. Kumar, J.1. These four appeals arise out of a common order passed by the learned Single Judge quashing the order of the Tahsildar dated 28.8.2004 pasted in Inam Case No. 1/83-84/87-88 c/w. Case No. MAG...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.B. Solanki, Major, Proprietor, Fancy Silk Centre Vs. Srikanta Parash ...
Karnataka
Nov-29-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 323, 324, 349, 499, 500, 501 and 502; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 200; Evidence Act - Sections 105
1997(1)ALT(Cri)912; 1997CriLJ3051; ILR1997KAR1545; 1997(2)KarLJ500
Belliyappa and ;A.K. Subbaiah, Advs.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23-3-1991 passed by the VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore City, whereby the said Magistrate was pleased to acquit the respondents/accused. 2. I heard the learned counsel,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »