Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k singla and · Page 1 of about 568 results (0.113 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 22 2002

Dr. Vivek Banyal Vs. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-22-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Nurshing Homes Registration Rules, 1953 - Rule 7; Delhi Nurshing Homes Registration (Amendement) Rules, 1992

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)47; AIR2002Delhi251

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singla, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule.With the consent of the parties, writ petitions are taken up for disposal.2. Civil Writ petition No. 4794/98 has been filed by Dr. Vivek Banyal, who was the Doctor on duty, managing Intensive...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1998

R.D. Gupta (Deceased) Vs. United Commercial Bank

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-15-1998

Subject : BankingService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998IVAD(Delhi)928; 74(1998)DLT596; 1998(46)DRJ259

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.A.K.Singla, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1.The petitioner was an employee of the United Commercial Bank. The disciplinary authority after framing the charges against the petitioner, imposed punishment of withholding of two increments of pay for the years 1984 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2004

Shri Sanjay Kumar Saxena Vs. Smt. Meeta Govel

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 5(7), 13(5), 14(1), 14(2), 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(7); Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 47, Rule 1; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950

Reported in : 114(2004)DLT710

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singla and; Pankaj Gupta, Advs

R.C. Jain, J.1. Whether a tenant can be denied the benefit of Section 14(2) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short ''The Act'') for his failure to comply with the order of payment or deposit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 23 2008

Shri Puran Mal Gupta and anr. Vs. State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 154(1), 156, 156(3), 173(2), 190, 190(1), 190(2), 192, 200, 202, 202(1) and 482

Reported in : 2008(106)DRJ192

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. and; J.K. Sharma, Adv

Manmohan, J.1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr. P.C.) for setting aside the order dated 11th March, 2008 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 16 2006

Vijay Risbud Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-16-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 10(6) and 10(7); Delhi Development Authority, Conduct Disciplinary and Appeal Regulations, 1999 - Regulation 20(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2006(89)DRJ682

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv.,; Pankaj Gupta and; Vivek Kishore

ORDERShri Vijay Risbud, former Commissioner (Planning), Delhi Development Authority was placed under suspension vide DDA's Order No. 95/Vig./AVO/ACB/2220, (issued from file No. 27(4)2003/Vig./AVO/ACB) dated 07.04.2003 consequent to filing of a case RC.AC.3/2003A 0002 by the Anti-Corruption...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 2004

Jarnail Singh Vs. Karamjit Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-02-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : (2004)137PLR747

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Singla, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. The tenant is the petitioner before this Court. He is aggrieved against the order of eviction dated December 4, 2003 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Kapurthala.2. Landlord, Karamjit Singh, filed an ejectment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2001

Smt. Sumitra Devi and anr. Vs. Smt. Gita Narula

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-04-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1), 21, 38, 47 and 115; Constitution of India - Order 21, Rules 2 and 92, Order 43, Rule 1(i) - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)851; 90(2001)DLT185; 2001(58)DRJ145

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Singla, Adv

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J. 1. The present petition arises out of an eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(c) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. In the course of hearing it appears that a statement was made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2009

Satish Chand Gupta Vs. the Presiding Officer, Delhi Co-operative Tribu ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-20-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 76; Delhi Co-operative Societies Rules, 1973 - Rules 36, 36(1), 36(2), 36(5) and 77; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT497

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv.,; Pankaj Gupta,; J.K. Sharma, Adv

Siddharth Mridul, J. 1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner, inter alia, prays for setting aside the order dated 24th October, 1995 passed by the Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1999

Krishan Garg Vs. Hari Om Gupta

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-07-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)772; 80(1999)DLT635; 1999(50)DRJ732

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Singla,Adv

ORDERDalveer Bhandari, J.1. This order shall dispose of the plaintiff's applications No. 10005/96 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2.2. The plaintiff has filed a suit for possession, damages (mesne profits), declaration and injunction. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2007

Prudential Spinners Ltd. Vs. the Employees P.F. Appellate Tribunal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction under Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1997 - Rule 7(2)

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT361; 2007(95)DRJ198; [2007(115)FLR29]

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv.,; Pankaj Gupta and; Promila K. Dhar

Hima Kohli, J.1. Rule.2. With the consent of counsels for the parties, all the three writ petitions are taken up for final hearing and disposal by passing a common order, as the issues involved are common....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial