Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k saxena · Page 1 of about 692 results (0.161 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 27 2002

i.T.i. Ltd., Naini Officers Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (U ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-27-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC3162; (2003)ILLJ1130All; (2002)3UPLBEC2324

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Saxena and ;R.G. Padia, Advs.

G.P. Mathur, J.1. The challenge herein is to the roll-back of the age of retirement. The age of retirement of all the employees of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the I.T.I.) from the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2003

Shyam Mohan Lal Vs. Gorakhpur University and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-03-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8, 9 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Arbitration Act, 1940

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC1228; (2004)1UPLBEC749

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Saxena, ;Deepak Saxena and ;Arti Saxena, Advs.

R. B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri N.K. Saxena, along with Arti Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State.2. In this petition prayer has been made for issuance of writ of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2002

Mohd. Umar S/O Bilal Vs. Ashok S/O Dattatray Nayak and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-31-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules and Orders - Sections 1 - Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23A, 23E and 23J

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT218; 2002(2)MPLJ139

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. i./b. ;S.C. Shrivastava, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. Applicant-tenant has filed this civil revision under Section 23E of the Accommodation Control Act, against the order dated 18-3-99, passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Indore, in Eviction Case No. A-9(7) 13/99, allowing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 10 2005

State (Through) Cbi Vs. Sh. Someshwar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-10-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 7, 11, 12, 13, 13(2), 13(1) and 20; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Secitons 227, 228 and 397

Reported in : 120(2005)DLT324; 2005(82)DRJ246

Advocate for Appellant : Amarjit Singh, Additional Solicitor General and; S.K. Saxena, Adv

H.R. Malhotra, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the orders of Special Judge dated 26th May,2004 discharging both the respondents-accused of offences under Section 7, 12, 13(2), 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act(hereinafter referred to as the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 1997

Shiv Shanker Goyal and ors. Vs. the Municipal Council, Ajmer

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-15-1997

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959 - Sections 170(1)

Reported in : AIR1997Raj176

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Saxena, Adv.

ORDERShiv Kumar Sharma, J. 1. 'I will not stop cutting down trees. Though there is life in them. I will not stop plucking out leaves. Though they make nature beautiful. I will not stop hacking off...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2004

Ravi Krishna Verma Vs. Committee of Management, Chutki Bhandar Girls I ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-29-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80(1) - Order 1, Rule 10 and 10(2)

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3597; (2005)1UPLBEC966

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Saxena, Adv.

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri B. K. Saxena and Sri R. S. Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties No. 1 and 2 as well as learned standing counsel.2. Short counter-affidavit has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2003

Limdi Bai Vs. Smt. Tulsi Bai (Deceased) Through L.Rs. Harishankar and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-26-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63 and 68

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT262

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Sr. Adv. and ;Raunka, Adv.

A.M. Sapre, J. 1. Two Courts have decreed plaintiffs suit for declaration of title in plaintiffs favour, cancellation of sale-deed dated 7-2-1974 executed by defendant No. 1 in favour of defendant No. 2 and sale-deed dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1994

Fattu @ Fatehsingh Laljiram Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 96, 325 and 326

Reported in : 1995(0)MPLJ785

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby taking exception to the order of conviction and sentence which has been passed against him by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shajapur in Criminal Case No. 479/88 wherein the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 1994

Fattu Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-07-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 325 and 326

Reported in : 1995CriLJ1970

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Saxena, Adv.

ORDERJ.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby taking exceptions to the order of conviction and sentence which has been passed against him by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Shajapur in Criminal Case No. 479/88 wherein the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2004

Committee of Management, Sri Nehru Inter College and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-22-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh High School and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salaries to Teachers and other Employees) Act, 1971 - Sections 6(3); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Sections 16G(7)

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1299

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Singh, Adv.;Y.K. Saxena, Adv.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. Sri Y.K. Saxena who represents the respondent No. 3, has made a statement at bar that he does not propose to file any counter affidavit and the writ petition be disposed on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial