Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Sunit Kumar

V.K. Shukla, J.1. In the present writ petition, subject matter of challenge is the order passed in summary court martial proceeding, wherein sentence has been awarded to the petitioner to serve rigorous imprisonment for six months...

Sh. Harcharan Singh Vs. Bureau of Indian Standards and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 111(2004)DLT766; 2004(76)DRJ237

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Rai, Adv

Pradeep Nandrajog, J. 1. Petitioner, stood promoted to the post of Deputy Director General under respondent no.1 on 30.6.2000. The next higher post available in the cadre was the post of Additional Director General. The post...

Modern Food Industries Employees Union Vs. Modern Food Industries and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)413; 80(1999)DLT3; (2000)ILLJ227Del

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Rai, Adv

K. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The petitioner-Union has prayed for the following reliefs:(i) Issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to regularise the services of the casual workmen mentioned...

Suresh Dubey Vs. District Inspector of Schools and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations, - Regulation 3(1)

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC732; (2004)2UPLBEC1876

Advocate for Appellant : C.K. Rai, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri C.K. Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Raj Kumar learned standing counsel for the State and Sri Manish Goyal, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3.2. In this petition, the...

Safal Rai Vs. State of Sikkim

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act - Sections 35

Reported in : 2002CriLJ856

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Rai, Adv.

ORDERAnup Deb, J.1. Heard Mr. B.K. Rai, ld. advocate appearing for the accused and Mr. S.P. Wangdi, ld. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.2. On instructions from the S.P. (West) and I.O. Mr. S.P. Wangdi, ld....

Gunjan and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)614; 84(2000)DLT817; 2000(53)DRJ760

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.K. Rustagi,; Mr. Shakti Chand Sharma,; Mr. K.K. Rai

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. By this judgment I propose to dispose of five writ petitions which were heard together as they involved same question of law to be decided on substantially the same set of facts. All...

Shri T.S. Oberoi Vs. Union F India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 41 and 47; All India Services (Medical Attendence) Rules, 1954; ;Administrative Tribunal Act - Sections 10

Reported in : 2002(64)DRJ454

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Rai,; M.S. Oberoi and; Amrit Kaur Oberoi, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. Petitioner, by this writ petition, seeks refund of Rs.51,200/- together with interest up to date. This respondents the amount charged by respondent No. 2, Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre (hereinafter referred...

Mount Carmel School Society and anr. Vs the Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.K. Rai, Mr. A.K. Sakhuja , Mr. S.K. Pandey, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of local paper may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be referred in the digest? Yes 1. These two...

indraprashtha Gas Ltd. Vs. Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant: K.K. Rai, Sr. Advocate and S.K. Pandey, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: J.S. Sinha, Advocate and Vikas Malhotra, Advocates.

M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Chairperson, J. 1. Indraprastha Gas Ltd. is the Appellant herein. Challenging the Clause 1.4.2.1(b) of the bid document dated 0.3.11.2008 and the order dated 26.02.2009 in clarification of the terms of the said...

Vijai and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 202 and 204; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 427 and 435

Reported in : 2004CriLJ2963

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Rai, Adv.

ORDERK.N. Ojha, J. 1. Instant revision has been preferred against order dated 20-2-1998 and 16-11-2000 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Azamgarh (II Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Azamgarh) by which the revisionists have been summoned under...