Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k naik · Page 1 of about 129 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 02 2009

Prithviraj Jayachand Oswal, Tah-dist-kolhapur Vs. Hem Securities Limit ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-02-2009

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Appellant present In Person. Mr. R.K. Naik, Adv. for Respondent No.1 Ms. Neelima Satope, Adv. for Respondent No.2

Oral Order: Per Mr. P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member 1) This is an appeal filed by the original complainant whose complaint No.361/2002 has been dismissed by the judgment delivered by the District Consumer Forum, Kolhapur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 1989

Braja Behera and ors. Vs. Gandaram Behera and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Aug-10-1989

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10A

Reported in : AIR1990Ori94; 69(1990)CLT26

Advocate for Appellant : G. Rath, ;R.K. Rath, ;N.C. Panigrahi and ;B.K. Naik, Advs.

S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Plaintiffs are the appellants against dismissal of the suit for partition. Relationship of the parties shall be clear from the following genealogy :-- Bharat (dead) _____________________________________________________________ Braja | | | | | |...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2009

Shri Satish Dattatray Vadke, Dist. Raigad Vs. Smt. Vanita Sitaram Kada ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-06-2009

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K. Naik, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Nitin Gangal, Advocate for the Respondent.

Oral Order:- Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President We heard Mr. R.K. Naik, Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Nitin Gangal, Advocate for the respondent. Since, identical law point is involved in these two appeals...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 06 1985

Sobha Chandra Gouda Vs. State

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Sep-06-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 379

Reported in : 1986(I)OLR111

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Naik, Adv.

S.C. Mohapatra, J1.In this appeal from jail, the appellant has challenged his convictions under sections 302 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code- Since the appellant was going undefended, we engaged Mr. A.K. Naik, Advocate to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2019

m.abbas Haji Vs. t.n.channakeshava

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-19-2019

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Balwada

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.664 OF2012M. ABBAS HAJI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS T.N. CHANNAKESHAVA RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DEEPAK GUPTA, J.Delay in filing substitution application is condoned. Application for substitution is allowed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2015

Vasu Hanamantappa Devaraddi Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Sep-09-2015

Subject : Criminal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2015PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.2516/2013 c/w 2517, 2518/2013 Crl.Appeal No.2516/2013 BETWEEN:1....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2017

Anil Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-03-2017

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 08.2017 ..... Appellant $~5. * + % LPA152016 ANIL KUMAR ANAND Through: Appellant in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2017

Anil Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-05-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. H.K. Naik, Mr. Rajnish, Mr. P.S. Neriwal, Mr. Ajay Amritraj, Mr. Sudhanshu Palo

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 05, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 7799/2017, CM Nos. 32194-32195/2017 ANIL KUMAR ANAND Through: In person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitesh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2003

interscape Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jul-22-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2003)(90)ECC65

1. Shri Vinoo K. Naik (appellant in Appeal No. 2336/98) is the proprietor of the concern M/s. Interscape (appellants in Appeal No.2335/98). Hotel Rajputana Palace Sheraton, Jaipur (appellant in Appeal No. 216/98) is a unit of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2016

K.V. Prakash Babu Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1138-1139 OF2016(@ S.L.P. (Crl) Nos. 5928-5929 OF2016 K.V. Prakash Babu … Appellant VERSUS State of Karnataka … Respondent JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial