Advanced Search Results
Prithviraj Jayachand Oswal, Tah-dist-kolhapur Vs. Hem Securities Limit ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Apr-02-2009
MRTP
Appellant present In Person. Mr. R.K. Naik, Adv. for Respondent No.1 Ms. Neelima Satope, Adv. for Respondent No.2
Oral Order: Per Mr. P.N. Kashalkar, Honble Presiding Judicial Member 1) This is an appeal filed by the original complainant whose complaint No.361/2002 has been dismissed by the judgment delivered by the District Consumer Forum, Kolhapur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBraja Behera and ors. Vs. Gandaram Behera and ors.
Orissa
Aug-10-1989
FamilyProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 22, Rule 10A
AIR1990Ori94; 69(1990)CLT26
G. Rath, ;R.K. Rath, ;N.C. Panigrahi and ;B.K. Naik, Advs.
S.C. Mohapatra, J.1. Plaintiffs are the appellants against dismissal of the suit for partition. Relationship of the parties shall be clear from the following genealogy :-- Bharat (dead) _____________________________________________________________ Braja | | | | | |...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Satish Dattatray Vadke, Dist. Raigad Vs. Smt. Vanita Sitaram Kada ...
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Apr-06-2009
Right to Information
Mr. R.K. Naik, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Nitin Gangal, Advocate for the Respondent.
Oral Order:- Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President We heard Mr. R.K. Naik, Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Nitin Gangal, Advocate for the respondent. Since, identical law point is involved in these two appeals...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sobha Chandra Gouda Vs. State
Orissa
Sep-06-1985
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 379
1986(I)OLR111
A.K. Naik, Adv.
S.C. Mohapatra, J1.In this appeal from jail, the appellant has challenged his convictions under sections 302 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code- Since the appellant was going undefended, we engaged Mr. A.K. Naik, Advocate to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askm.abbas Haji Vs. t.n.channakeshava
Supreme Court of India
Sep-19-2019
Education
Sushil Balwada
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.664 OF2012M. ABBAS HAJI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS T.N. CHANNAKESHAVA RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DEEPAK GUPTA, J.Delay in filing substitution application is condoned. Application for substitution is allowed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVasu Hanamantappa Devaraddi Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka Dharwad
Sep-09-2015
Criminal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH R DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF SEPTEMBER2015PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.2516/2013 c/w 2517, 2518/2013 Crl.Appeal No.2516/2013 BETWEEN:1....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors.
Delhi
Aug-03-2017
Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 08.2017 ..... Appellant $~5. * + % LPA152016 ANIL KUMAR ANAND Through: Appellant in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through:...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Anand vs.union of India & Ors
Delhi
Sep-05-2017
Land Acquisition
Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Mr. H.K. Naik, Mr. Rajnish, Mr. P.S. Neriwal, Mr. Ajay Amritraj, Mr. Sudhanshu Palo
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: September 05, 2017 % + W.P.(C) 7799/2017, CM Nos. 32194-32195/2017 ANIL KUMAR ANAND Through: In person. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jitesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinterscape Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-22-2003
Land Acquisition
(2003)(90)ECC65
1. Shri Vinoo K. Naik (appellant in Appeal No. 2336/98) is the proprietor of the concern M/s. Interscape (appellants in Appeal No.2335/98). Hotel Rajputana Palace Sheraton, Jaipur (appellant in Appeal No. 216/98) is a unit of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.V. Prakash Babu Vs. State of Karnataka
Supreme Court of India
Nov-22-2016
Land Acquisition
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 1138-1139 OF2016(@ S.L.P. (Crl) Nos. 5928-5929 OF2016 K.V. Prakash Babu … Appellant VERSUS State of Karnataka … Respondent JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.Leave granted.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »