Advanced Search Results

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Km. Suman and ors.,

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR171(Jhr)]; (2003)IIILLJ951Jhar

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Mehta, Adv.

Hari Shankar Prasad, J.1. Since in all the appeals filed under Section 10 of the Letters Patent, similar question of law and facts are involved, these appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of...

Progetto Grano S.P.A. Vs. Shri Lal Mahal Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 49, 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 3 Rule 4

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Jayant K. Mehta; Ms. Tanya Khare; Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advs.

1. By this order I shall dispose of the objections raised by the defendant vide the affidavit dated 10.08.2011 to Mr. Jayant K.Mehta, Advocate appearing on behalf of the plaintiff. The affidavit has been filed on...

Deb Sadhan Roy Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 Sections 12 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 22(4) and 32

Reported in : AIR1972SC1924; 1973CriLJ446; (1972)1SCC308; [1972]2SCR787

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Mehta, Adv

P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This petition under Article 32 challenges the detention under the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 (hereinafter called the Act'), It may be mentioned that this and other Writ Petitions...

Employers in Relation to the Management of Kessurgarh Colliery of B.C. ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR159(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Mehta, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J. 1. Heard Mr. A.K. Mehta learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.2. The petitioner (M/s. B.C.C.L.) is aggrieved by the award dated 10.7.1995 passed...

Employers in Relation to the Management of Moonidih Project of Bccl Vs ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Laws; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2003(3)JCR605(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Mehta, Adv.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. The petitioner who is the Management of Moonidih Project of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, has prayed for quashing the award dated 28.9.1992 passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal (in...

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Uppal Engineering (P) Ltd. and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2006P& H71; (2005)141PLR806

Advocate for Appellant : I.K. Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; Ranjit Mehta, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. The defendant-Indian Oil Corporation Limited is the petitioner before this Court.2. The plaintiff-Uppal Engineering Company (P) Limited filed a suit for declaration with some consequential reliefs against defendant No. 1, Syndicate Bank and...

Modern Food Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Mukerian Papers Limited and an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 14, Rule 2(2); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (2003)135PLR150

Advocate for Appellant : I.K. Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; M.M. Kohli, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J. 1. In view of the law laid down in the case of Shiv Shakti Coop. Housing Society Nagpur v. Swaraj Development and Ors., J.T. 2003(4) S.C. 255 the revision petition filed by the...

Printers Engineering Company Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - Sections 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2000)126PLR205

Advocate for Appellant : I.K. Mehta, Sr. Adv. and; Meetu Verma, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The facts brought on the record of this petition which has been filed for quashing the order dated 6.11.1998 passed by the Commissioner and Secretary to Government of Haryana, Town and Country Planning...

Takhatray Shivadattray Mankad Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311; Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959 - Rules 188, 189 and 189A; Junagadh State Pension and Parwashi Allowances Rules, 1932 - Rule 241A; Bombay Civil Service (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules - Rule 33

Reported in : AIR1989SC1843; (1990)1GLR34; JT1989(3)SC33; 1989(1)SCALE1244; 1989Supp(2)SCC110; [1989]3SCR214; 1989(3)SLJ97(SC); 1989(2)LC342(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Mehta, Senior Adv

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment of the Gujarat High Court dismissing the appeal made in Letters Patent Appeal No. 145 of 1978 arising from the order passed...

Regal Sports Vs. Mohd. Siddique and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : II(1992)ACC740; 1994ACJ294

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Mehta and; G.S. Mehta, Advs.

N.K. Jain, J. 1. Both these appeals under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, filed against the judgment of the learned M.A.C.T., Jodhpur, dated 23.7.1983 in case No. 48 of 1980.2. Since both the...