Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k kumarasamy · Page 1 of about 70 results (0.080 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 08 2012

State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the District Collector Erode and Others Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-08-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(8)MLJ41

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: S. Pattabiraman, Advocate. For the Respondent: A.K. Kumarasamy, Advocate.

(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2008 made in A.S.No.124 of 2007 on the file of 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode reversing the judgment and decree made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2012

Parameswari and Others Vs. A. Kumar and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-30-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2013(1)TNMAC439

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: A.K. Kumarasamy, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. N.B. Surekha, Advocate.

(Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the award made in M.C.O.P. No.385 of 2008 dated 09.12.2009 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II Additional Sub Court), Erode.)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2004

Chenni, Vs. Chellammal,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-13-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 23

Reported in : (2004)4MLJ172

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Kumarasamy, Adv.

M. Thanikachalam, J.1. Defendants 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7, aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court in O.S.No.302 of 1986 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Erode, have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 2006

Bharath Primary School Run by Sri Bathrakaliamman Trust Rep. by Its Se ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-15-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 23; Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 1974 - Rule 15(4)

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1125

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Kumarasamy, Adv.

K. Chandru, J.1. The appellant is a primary School governed by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 1974 (for short, 'School Rules'). In this writ appeal, they have challenged the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2007

V. Shanmugam Vs. S. Umamaheswaran

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-16-2007

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 165; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 17

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ382

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Kumarasamy, Adv.

ORDERA. Kulasekaran, J.1. This revision petition is listed today for admission and I heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner.The first defendant in O.S. No. 27 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Judge, Erode...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2012

The Gobichettipalayam Association Rep. Vs. the Bar Council of Tamilnad ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-12-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tamilnadu Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1987. - Section 13, 2(a) ; Constitution of India - Articles 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 2(1)(a), 3(1)(cc), 17(1), 22(1), 24A, 26A, 29, 30, 33; Tamilnadu Act - Section 13, 27; Tamilnadu Welfare Fund Act - Section 14A; Tamilnadu Advocates Welfare Fund Rules, 1989 ; Constitution of India - Articles 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy, Adv.

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in Resolution No.286 of 2010 dated 17.7.2010, quash the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 1996

Dharman and Six ors. Vs. Marimuthu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 6, Rule 4; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 16; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 122 and 126

Reported in : 1996(2)CTC279

Advocate for Appellant : G. Subramaniam, Sr. Counsel for ;Prabhakar, Adv.

ORDERD. Raju, J.1. Defendants 2 to 7 in O.S.No.338 of 1977 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Ariyalur, who succeeded before the Trial Court, but lost before the First Appellate Court, are the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2021

R.jankiammal Vs. S.k.kumaraswamy (d) Thr.lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-30-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : VIKAS MEHTA __ SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1537 OF2016R. JANAKIAMMAL ... APPELLANT VERSUS S.K. KUMARASAMY(DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1538 OF2016S.R. SOMASUNDARAM AND ANOTHER...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2026

Subbaiah Gounder vs Palanisamy Gounder- Died

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and M.P.No.1 of 20151. Subbaiah Gounder2. Palanisamy Appellant(s) Vs1. Palanisamy Gounder (died)2. Balasubramaniam3. Mayilathal4. Kanna Alias KannathalRespondent(s) R1 died R2 LR of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 29 2002

Marayammal Vs. R. Kamalathal and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-29-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 18, Rule 17

Reported in : (2002)2MLJ734

Advocate for Appellant : V. Raghavachari, Adv.

ORDERM. Karpagavinayagam, J. 1. Maryammal, the petitioner is the second defendant. After completion of trial, she filed four applications in I.A. Nos. 283, 284, 285 and 286 of 2002 to reopen the case, to recall of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial