Advanced Search Results
K.P. Bhargava Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax
Allahabad
Feb-05-1963
Sales Tax
[1963]14STC386(All)
A.K. Kirty, Adv.
K.B. Asthana, J.1. This is a reference under Section 11 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act made by the learned Judge (Revisions) at the instance of G.G. Industries of Belanganj, Agra (hereinafter called the assessee). The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStandard Refinery Co. Vs. Sales Tax Commissioner
Allahabad
Feb-08-1963
Sales Tax
[1963]14STC529(All)
A.K. Kirty, Adv.
K.B. Asthana, J.1. This is a reference under Section 11 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act at the instance of M/s. Standard Refinery Co. (hereinaftercalled the assessee) in which the following questions of law have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLoon Karan Sethiya Vs. Ivan E. John and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-10-1963
CivilContract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 202
AIR1964All441
A.K. Kirty, Adv.
Dhavan, J. 1. This is a decree-holder's appeal from an order of the Second Additional Civil Judge, Agra, dismissing his application praying that the Court should not proceed with the execution of the decree at the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sehat Ali Khan and anr. Vs. Abdul Qavi Khan and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-28-1955
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 12(2) and 29(2); Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 7; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908
AIR1956All273
A.K. Kirty, Adv.
Agarwala, Desai And V. Bhargava, JJ.1. This case has been referred to this Bench for a decision of the question whether in a Letters Patent appeal the time requisite for obtaining copies of the judgment and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState and anr. Vs. Jagannath Singhal
Allahabad
Apr-25-1961
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 517 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420
AIR1962All153
Shambhu Prasad, Senior Standing Counsel
ORDERJagdish Sahai, J. 1. The opposite party Jagannath Singhal (hereinafter referred to as Singhal) holds a decree for a sum of RS. 17,344/4/- against the Rampur Bankers Ltd., Rampur (hereinafter called the Bankers). The Bankers had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLoon Karan Sohan Lal Vs. Firm John and Co. and ors.
Allahabad
Mar-12-1965
Commercial
Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 4, 23 and 32; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182 and 222
AIR1967All308
S.N. Misra, Adv.
Dhavan, J.1. I agree with the conclusions of my learned brother that the plaintiff-appellant has not established any liability on the part of the fifth defendant Sethiya and Co. I would like to add a few...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai NaraIn Har NaraIn and anr. Vs. L. Bulaqi Das S/O. L. Munna Lal
Allahabad
Sep-23-1968
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11
AIR1969All504
M.P. Mehrotra and ;Brij Lal Gupta, Advs.
Jagdish Sahai, J. 1. It would contribute to a clear understanding of the question referred to us for our opinion If the following facts are given:--- Suit No. 6 of 1956 of the Court of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAgarwal Iron Works Vs. Labour Court and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-22-1961
Labour and Industrial
(1962)IILLJ334All
Mr. A.K. Kirty
V.G. Oak, J.1. This writ petition is directed against a proceeding pending before a labour court.2. The petitioner is a registered partnership firm. Respondents 3, 4 and 5 were employees of the petitioner. They were discharged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUdhoo Dass Vs. Prem Prakash and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-06-1963
TenancyContract
Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Act, 1947
AIR1964All1
A.K. Kirty, Adv.
Desai, C.J.1. The following question has been referred to this Bencn for its opinion:--'Whether a contract of tenancy of an accommodation governed by the U.P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and EVICtion Act entered into by a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.P. Khandewal and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-04-1954
Property
Utter Pradesh Land Acquisition (Rehabilitation of Refugees)Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 11(1); Constitution of India - Sections 299(2) - Articles 14, 31, 31(2), 31(4), 31(5), 31(6), 226 and 366(10); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 311(2); ;Uttar Pradesh Town Improvement Act, 1919
AIR1955All12
A.K. Kirty, Adv.
Mootham, J. 1. These are six petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution in which common questions of law arise and which can conveniently be dealt with in a single judgment. The petitioners challenge the validity...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »