Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k jaiswal · Page 1 of about 430 results (0.109 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 2002

Goude Ilaiah Vs. State of A.P., Through Sub-inspector, R.P.F.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act - Sections 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 211, 212 and 215

Reported in : 2002(1)ALT(Cri)457

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

Gopalakrishna Tamada, J. 1. The petitioner herein (A-5) and four others were tried in C.C.No.222 of 1996 for the offence punishable under Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act by the learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1998

Chunmun Vs. District, Magistrate, Sonbhadra and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-03-1998

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12(1), 95(1) and 110; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules, 1947 - Rules 47 and 47A; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Removal of Pradhan, Up-Pradhans and Members) Enquiry Rules, 1997 - Rules 3, 3(1), (2), (3), (5) and (6), 4, 4(1), 5, 7 and 8; Constitution of India - Articles 4(2) and 243B, C, G and H; Constitution of India (Seventy-third Amendment) Act, 1992

Reported in : 1998(3)AWC1892; (1998)3UPLBEC2061

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

S.R. Singh, J.1. Impugned herein is the order dated 29.5.1998 passed by the District Magistrate. Sonbhadra in purported exercise of powers under the proviso to clause (g) of sub-section (1) of Section (95) of the U....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2014

Smt. Triveni Chouksey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-30-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.K.Jaiswal

1 W.P.No.1393/2014 Smt.Triveni Chouksey State of M.P.& others 30.1.2014 Shri R.K.Jaiswal, Counsel for petitioner. Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, G.A for respondents. Petitioner has sought for following reliefs:- “(i) That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be issue appropriate...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 18 1996

Poorna Electrical Industries Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-18-1996

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(8)

Reported in : [1997]107STC257(AP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

ORDERSyed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J. 1. Clause (b) of sub-section (8) of section 14 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, which deals with levy of penalty under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2005

Satendra Kumar Sharma Son of Late Tej Pal Sharma Vs. State of U.P. Thr ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991 - Rules 5(1), 14 and 14(1); Police Regulations

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC2091

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

Vikram Nath, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 15.05.2000, whereby the petitioner was dismissed from service and also the order dated 10.01.2002, whereby the appeal against the order of dismissal has also...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2002

Anima Gupta Vs. Tarun Kumar Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-18-2002

Subject : Family

Acts : Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR2003All76

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

ORDERB.K. Rathi, J.1. The opposite party moved an application under Section 25 of Guardians & Wards Act read with Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act for appointment of guardian and custody of minor...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2013

Dhirendra Kumar Vs. Krishna Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-01-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.K.Jaiswal

1 S.A.No.914/1996 Dheerendra Kumar Choudhary. versus Krishna Kumar Choudhary 01.05.2013 Shri R.K.Jaiswal learned counsel for the appellant. Shri K.B.Bhatnagar learned counsel for the respondent. The appellant and the respondent are present in person. The learned counsel...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2002

Narendra Singh Alias Natey Singh and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-20-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : 2003CriLJ205

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Chaturvedi, ;V.K. Jaiswal and ;A.D. Giri, Advs.

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. These two criminal appeals, being Criminal Appeal No. 829 of 1996 (filed on behalf of Bansh Bahadur Singh and Jat Pratap Singh alias Ram Pratap Singh) and Criminal Appeal No. 776 of 1996...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2004

Panch Lal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-22-2004

Subject : Election

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 12C; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election of Members, Pradhan and Up Pradhan) Rules, 1994 - Rules 88, 91, 91(2) and 93

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC853

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;V.K. Jaiswal, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare senior advocate assisted by Sri V, K. Jaiswal advocate for the petitioner and Sri Vidya Sagar appearing for the contesting respondent No. 6.2. By this writ petition the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1993

Uco Bank, Chandigarh Vs. Sumac Engineering Private Ltd. and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-24-1993

Subject : Company

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 - Schedule-I - Article 1; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 446, 446(1 and 2), 466(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 6 and Order 34, Rule 4; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960

Reported in : AIR1994P& H26; [1997]89CompCas220(P& H); (1994)106PLR516

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

ORDER1. Sumac Engineering Private Ltd. (hereinafter called 'the Company') was ordered to be wound up on May 29, 1992 and the official Liquidator attached to this Court was appointed its liquidator. The Company in the pre-liquidation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial