Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k goyal · Page 1 of about 307 results (0.126 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 24 2000

Shyama Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-24-2000

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC633; 2000(2)WLN365

Advocate for Appellant : Varun Goyal and; Mr. N.K. Goyal, Advs.

ORDERShethna, J.(1). Main Writ Petition No. 1129/99 was dismissed by me on 31.8.99. The said order was initially challenged by the petitioner before the Division Bench of this Court by way of special appeal filed on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2003

Mehar Singh Vs. Sadhu Ram and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-07-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 149

Reported in : (2003)135PLR285

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Goyal, Adv.

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.1. This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the orders dated 26.12.1984 (Annexure P-7) passed by Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Naraingarh, Camp at Jagadhri, dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2010

Nandlal and ors. Vs. Devi Shankar and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on : Aug-26-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Revenue Act - Section 140; Rajasthan Tenancy Act - 224(2); Evidence Act - 95; Transfer of Property Act - Section 53A.

Advocate for Appellant : Shri R.K. Goyal; Shri M.A. Khan, Advs.

1. This special appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 15.03.2002 whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants herein was dismissed. The appellants original writ petitioners in the writ petition,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 2004

Welfare Association of Self Financed Institutions and ors. Vs. State o ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-15-2004

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10(4)

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC27

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Upadhyay and ;A.K. Goyal, Advs.

Arun Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri V. B. Upadhyay Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri A. K. Goyal Advocate on behalf of the petitioners, Additional Advocate General Sri Sudhir Agrawal and Chief Standing Counsel Sri S. M. A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1976

Mohinder Prakash and anr. Vs. Haqiq Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-22-1976

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 17, Rules 1, 1(3) and 3 - Order 47 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1977P& H31

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Goyal, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Narula, C.J. 1. In a suit for possession filed by the plaintiff-petitioner against the defendant-respondent, issues were framed on July 19, 1974, and the case was adjourned for the evidence of the plaintiff to September...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 1993

Biru Vs. Gram Panchyat and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-1993

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 - Sections 5A; Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Haryana Village Common Lands (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : (1993)105PLR214

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Goyal, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J. 1. This case represents the third round of litigation. The petitioner who claims to be a carpenter by vocation is aggrieved by the order dated March 13, 1991. By its order the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2003

Jagdish Singh, Son of Shri Sajjan Singh Vs. Balwant Singh, Son of Smt. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-21-2003

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 90

Reported in : (2004)138PLR59

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Goyal, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed under Sub-section (6) of Section 15 of the Haryana Urban Rent (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, (for brevity the Act), is directed against the judgment dated 11.12.2001 passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1999

Jagdish NaraIn Chopra Vs. Allahabad District Co-operative Bank Ltd. an ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-21-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2622a; (2000)ILLJ181All; (1999)2UPLBEC1591

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Goyal, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. The petitioner after his retirement had been paid the amount of his provident fund due to him. But the Gratuity and other terminal benefits were not paid to him on the ground as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2006

Gulab Kanwar (Smt.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-25-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupant) Act, 1964 - Sections 4

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3076

Advocate for Appellant : Bajrang Lal Sharma and; R.K. Goyal, Advs. and; G.L. Pare

Ashok Parihar, J.1. Since on same set of facts similar relief has been sought, both the writ petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. The matter appears to have a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2009

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Mohammed Iqbal Bhatti

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-31-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 13(2), 19 and 88; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197; Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 166; Executive Business Rules - Rules 8, 9, 18 and 19

Reported in : JT2009(13)SC180; 2009(II)OLR(SC)525

Advocate for Appellant : Vivek K. Goyal, AAG,; Pb. Kuldeep Singh, Adv. for; Arun K. S

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short question which arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the State has any power of review in the matter of grant of sanction in terms of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial