Advanced Search Results

Shyama Pada Choudhury Vs. Saha Choudhury and Co. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rules 10, 22 and 23; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1976Cal122,80CWN29

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Dutt and ;A.K. Basu, Advs.

Janah, J. 1. This appeal is by the judgment-debtor defendant No. 6 and is against the judgment and order dated 6th March, 1973 passed by A.K. Sarkar, J. allowing an application for execution of the decree...

India Foils Ltd. Vs. the 5th Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 11, Rule 14

Reported in : AIR1972Cal308,76CWN404

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Dutt, Adv.

ORDER1. This is an application forappropriate order and/or directions directing the respondents not to give effect to or enforce an order of the respondent No. 1, being order No. 27 of July 3, 1971.2. The petitioner's...

Talakchand Kanji Vora Vs. Keshavlal Dullabajji Sheth

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 7 and 32

Reported in : AIR1973Cal279,78CWN744

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Dutt, Adv.

ORDERHazra, J.1. This is a petition by one partner Talakchand Kanji Vora (hereinafter referred to as 'Kanji Vora') against another partner Keshavlal DulIabhji Sheth (hereinafter referred to as 'Sheth') for injunction and for appointment of receiver,...

Sitaram Agarwala and anr. Vs. State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Customs

Acts : Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167, 167(81), 178, 178A and 178A(1); ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 511

Reported in : AIR1962Cal370

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Dutt and ;Prasun Chandra Ghosh, Advs. in No. 345/59, ;Sudhangsu S. Mukherji and ;N.C. Talukdar, Advs. in No. 360/59

S.K. SEN, J. 1. The appellants of the two appeals Sitaram Agarwalla and Wang Chih Kaw have been convicted under Section 167(81) of the Sea Customs Act. Sitaram Agarwala has been sentenced to pay a fine...

Dilip Kumar Mehta and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Rajendra Agricultural University Act, 1971 - Sections 25(2), 29 and 32; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 311

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Dutt, Adv. for Rajendra Agricultural UniversityRam Balak Mahto, Sr. Adv. and Ajay, Adv.

Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, J. 1. This application has been filed for quashing Clause-6 of resolution of the State Government in the department of Agriculture dated 11.7.2003 (Annexure 1), whereby the Routine Clerk, Assistant, Personal Assistant and...

Ebrahim Peer Mohamed Vs. Kissen Gopal Bagree and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Reported in : AIR1937Cal180

Ameer Ali, J.1. This is a difficult matter, both, on account of the state of our law on the subject of trusts, and on account of the very peculiar facts. I would, therefore, have preferred to...

Sheonandan Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 24, 24(8), 25, 209(1), 209(2), 253(1), 253(2), 302, 306(4), 321, 417, 435, 436 and 439; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 109, 120B, 121A, 147, 148, 149, 307, 324, 417, 420, 463, 464, 466, 471; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR1983SC1125; AIR1983SC194; 1983(0)BLJR645; 1983CriLJ348; 1984(1)Crimes147(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1241; 1983(2)SCALE126; (1983)1SCC438; (1983)4SCC104; [1983]2SCR61

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Venugopal,; S.K. Sinha,; S.K. Verma,;

1. By this appeal, preferred on the basis of the special leave granted to him, the appellant is challenging the withdrawal from the prosecution of Respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 4 in a criminal case under...

Texmaco Limited Vs. the Union of India and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: January 28, 2013 + CS(OS) No.1439/1991 TEXMACO LIMITED Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sumit Sen, Adv. versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........

Dineshbhai Harishbhai Sonkusare Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 225 to 237, 257, 313, 397 and 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306 and 498A; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : II(2005)DMC79; (2005)1GLR292

Advocate for Appellant : Ashish M. Dagli, Adv. for Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4

J.R. Vora, J.1. This Revision Application is preferred under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the accused of Sessions Case No. 263 of 2002 pending before Learned Principal Judge, City...

Mohammed Asif Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Chief Sec ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India -- Articles 14 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 2, 24 and 321; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 13; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC339

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N. Jothi, Adv.

ORDER1. Rule Public Prosecutor takes notice. Heard immediately with consent of the parties.2. The writ petition herein involves an unusual but interesting question of law. The petitioner questions the decision on the part of the Government...