Advanced Search Results

Umakant Mudgal. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Appellant : Shri D.K. Dixit, Adv.

1- Petitioner, who at the relevant time in the year 1998 when this petition was filed was the Mandi Secretary Grade IV and was posted in Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Sihora, Jabalpur has filed this writ...

LaxminaraIn Deohare and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 60

Reported in : AIR2000MP175

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Gangele and ;S.K. Dixit, Advs.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. Both the writ petitions being interlinked and inter-connected were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order. In W. P. No. 3297/99 the challenge is to the grant of catering...

Hari Narayan Sakya Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(2)MPHT259; 2000(3)MPLJ351

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, Sr. Adv., ;D.K. Dixit, ;Mahendra Pateriya, ;Ramesh Shrivastava, ;Jailaxmi Aiyar and ;Ajay Mishra, Advs.

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. This batch of 17 Writ Petitions (1) W.P. 1808/98 (Maniram Jatav v. State of M.P. and Ors.), (2) W.P. No. 5785/98 (Ramavtar Sahu v. State of M.P. and Ors.), (3) W.P. No. 5790/98...

Mata Prasad Sahu Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(3)MPHT408

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, Sr. Adv., ;D.K. Dixit, ;Mahendra Pateriya, ;Ramesh Shrivastava, ;Jailaxmi Aiyar and ;Ajay Mishra, Advs.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J.1. This batch of 17 Writ Petitions (1) W.P. 1808/98 (Maniram Jatav v. State of M.P. and Ors.); (2) W.P. No. 5785/98 (Ramavtar Sahu v. State of M.P. and Ors.); (3) W.P. No. 5790/98...

Shephali Builders and Contractors Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and or ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2007(2)CTLJ350(MP); 2006(1)MPHT476; 2006(2)MPLJ102

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Dixit, Adv.

Shantanu Kemkar, J.1. By filing this petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the condition No. 10 of the notice inviting tender ('NIT' for short), dated 24-10-2005 for laying underground...

Bhujbalsingh and ors. Vs. Arjun Singh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951 - Sections 38; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 - Sections 86; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 42

Reported in : AIR1971MP200

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Dixit, Adv.

Sen, J. 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution directed against an order of the Board of Revenue, dated 3rd September, 1969, declaring that the non-petitioner No. 1 held the suit land...

M.P. State Handloom Weavers Co-operative Federation Ltd. Vs. Shankarla ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12 and 12(2)

Reported in : (1996)IIILLJ103MP; 1996MPLJ466

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Dixit, adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. By this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner employer has prayed for quashment of the order dated October 7, 1994 (Annexure P 3) passed by the respondent No....

H.S. Sahu. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh, and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri D.K. Dixit, Adv.

1- Challenging the order-dated 1.3.2006 Annexure P/6-A, petitioner has filed this writ petition. By the impugned order, an earlier order passed on 3.6.2005, granting pay in the scale Rs.4500-7000 has been cancelled and pay of the...

Ram Lal Sharma, and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri D.K. Dixit, Adv.

1- As common questions are involved in both these petitions and as the dispute pertains to posting of the petitioners again in Working Plan Area and the effect of a subsequent policy enforced by the State...

Smt. Poona Bai and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT268

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Dixit, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioners are legal representatives of one late Ganesh Prasad Sahu who was served with a charge-sheet vide memorandum dated 14-8-1997 whereby he was required to submit his reply within seven days. Without...