Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k chopra · Page 1 of about 605 results (0.233 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 27 2006

Dongfang Electric Corporation Vs. Reliance Energy Limited and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-27-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : (2006)143PLR54

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra,; Ashish Chopra and; Sunil Goel, Advs.

D.K. Jain, C.J.1. Rule DB.2. Since the project, subject-matter of the present litigation, is of vital public importance, disposal of the case does not brook any delay. Accordingly, with the consent of learned Counsel for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2006

Reekha Kumari Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-17-2006

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 24(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2006)143PLR518

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra, Sr. Adv.,; Deepinder Malhotra and; Jagdish

M.M. Kumar, J.1. Human nature is complex. It leads people to display their wealth in marriages, various parties and by building huge bungalows, then it also leads people to conceal their wealth. The occasions, of course,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 2004

Vishvjyoti Trading Limited and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-14-2004

Subject : ConstitutionCommercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 227

Reported in : III(2005)BC559; (2005)140PLR215

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra, Sr. Adv. and; Ashish Chopra, Adv.

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners at length and perused the paper-book.2. In this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge Instruction No. 9...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 05 2004

Shri Davinder Singh and ors. Vs. Administrator, Urban Estate and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-05-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Haryana Urban Development Authorities Act, 1977 - Sections 42

Reported in : (2004)137PLR822

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra, Sr. Adv. and; S.S. Dhaliwal, Adv.

H.S. Bedi, J.1. The petitioners purchased shop-cum-flat No. 47 in Sector 8, Panchkula in an open auction held on 24.7.1981. The bid was for a sum of Rs. 5,05,000/-. As per the prescribed procedure, 10% of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 1992

Behari Lal Vs. Gram Panchayat, Salemshah

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-23-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : East Punjab Utilization of Lands Act, 1949 - Sections 7; Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (1992)102PLR59

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra, Adv.

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. These three petition, viz. C. W. P. Nos. 7486, 74?5 and 7215 of i987, involve common questions of fact and law. Consequently, they . will be disposed of by one order. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 1990

Oriental Bank of Commerce Vs. Hukam Chand and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-03-1990

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : (1990)98PLR582

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra, Adv.

ORDERN.C. Jain, J.1. This revision petition has been directed against the order of the trial Court, dated 28th August, 1989, by which the Subordinate Judge I Class, Samana had refused to res(SIC)ore the suit against defendant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2004

Prem Kumar Ghai and ors. Vs. Dr. Bir Bhan Garg

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-13-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act - Sections 37 and 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000; Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Regulation - Regulation 3(5); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR2005P& H193; (2005)140PLR588

Advocate for Appellant : A.K.Chopra. Senior Adv. and; A.S. Narang, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J. 1. This civil revision is directed against the judgment passed on 4.9.2004 (Annexure P-2) by the Additional District Judge, Faridkot reversing the order dated 19.11.2003 of the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Faridkot...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1995

Smt. Sushila Kanodia Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on : Nov-20-1995

Subject : FERA

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra for the Appellant. Dr. Shamsuddin for the Respondent.

1. This appeal is directed against Adjudication Order No. ADDL/HKS/II/5/91, dated 4-1-1991 under which a penalty of Rs. 6 lakhs has been imposed on the appellant for non-realisation of the proceeds of exports of the total...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2005

Parminder Singh Vs. Savita Sharma

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-09-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 5, Rules 17 and 19

Reported in : (2006)142PLR634

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chopra, Sr. Adv. and; Harminder Singh, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This is defendants appeal challenging the order of his ejectment with a further relief of possession granted to the plaintiff-respondent in respect of the demised shop. The plaintiff-respondent has also been held...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2005

Mohinder Ram and anr. Vs. F.C.i. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-06-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Food Corporation of India (Staff) Regulations, 1971 - Regulation 74; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2006)142PLR833

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Chopra, Adv.

S.S. Nijjar, J. 1. The petitioners joined service of the Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the FCI') as Watchman/Assistant Grade-III (Depot), respectively on 16.8.1969 and 23.12.1971. On 16.12.1971, petitioner No. 1 was promoted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial