Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a k chitale · Page 1 of about 100 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 12 2001

Adcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Daulat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-2001

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22 and 22(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 2001VIIAD(SC)513; AIR2001SC3712; 2001(4)ALLMR(SC)479; JT2001(7)SC580; 2001(6)SCALE252; (2001)7SCC698; 2002(1)LC56(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Sr. Adv.,; M. Mannan and; Krishnand Pandeya

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. This appeal, by special leave, raises an interesting question: whether a suit simpliciter for specific performance of contract for sale of immovable property is a 'suit for land' within clause 12...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1976

Anant Laxman Purohit Vs. the Indore Parasper Sahakari Bank Ltd., Indor ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-23-1976

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 64(1) and 77; Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1977MP217

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Adv.

Kondaiah, J. 1. This bunch of miscellaneous petitions, by the petitioners, gives rise to two short but interesting questions of law, (i) whether the Assistant Registrar is competent to determine a dispute between the financing bank...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1981

Sukhdayal Pahwa Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-1981

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148, 149, 149(1), 149(2), 150, 150(1) and 151

Reported in : [1983]140ITR206(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Adv.

Shukla, J.1. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, has under Section 256(1) of the I.T. Act, referred the following questions of law for our opinion:'1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 21 2006

Rishikesh Sharma Vs. Saroj Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-21-2006

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 28

Reported in : 2007(1)ALT1(SC); 2007(1)AWC946(SC); 2006(5)CTC703; I(2007)DMC77SC; [2007(2)JCR239(SC)]; 2007(3)MhLj1; 2007(2)MPLJ319; 2006(12)SCALE282; (2007)2SCC263; 2006(3)ShimLC389

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale. Sr. Adv.,; Niraj Sharma and; Vikrant Singh Bai

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The husband, is the appellant before us. The respondent is his wife. They got married according to the Hindu rites and customs in the year 1972. After three years of marriage...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2006

Narmada Pd. Yadav Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-03-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR1192]; 2006(11)SCALE439; 2007(1)SCC681

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Sr. Adv.,; Niraj Sharma and; Vikrant Sharma

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. We have heard Mr. A.K. Chitale, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and Mr. B.S. Banathia, learned Counsel for the respondents. We have perused the charge framed against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1996

Kalika Prasad and anr. Vs. Chhatrapal Singh (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-18-1996

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : AIR1997SC1699; JT1997(1)SC372; 1997(1)SCALE207; (1997)2SCC544; [1996]Supp10SCR371

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale S.K. Agnihotri,; V.D. Khanna and Yogamaya Agnihotri, Advs

ORDER1. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the learned single Judge of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh made on October 12, 1985 in Second Appeal No. 309/80.2. The admitted facts are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 07 1988

Bank of Baroda Vs. Chaddha and Company and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-07-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Textile Undertakings (Taking Over and Management) Act, 1983 - Sections 6

Reported in : [1990]67CompCas6(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Adv.

S.K. Dubey, J.1. This is a revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure arising out of the order dated April 17, 1988, passed by the learned VIth Additional Judge, to the Court of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1992

Bank of Baroda Vs. Collector of Indore and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-12-1992

Subject : BankingCivil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 6A

Reported in : [1995]82CompCas580(MP); 1993CriLJ3503; 1993(0)MPLJ90

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Adv.

S.K. Jha, C.J.1. The question which falls for determination in this case is as to what will be the effect of a legal seizure and confiscation under Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, over...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2003

Motilal and anr. Vs. NiyazuddIn (Dead) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-21-2003

Subject : Property

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Sections 158(1); Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950, Samvat, 2007 - Sections 54; Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951, Samvat, 2003

Reported in : AIR2003SC3923; JT2003(5)SC606; 2003(5)SCALE334; (2003)11SCC672

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale, Sr. Adv. and; Niraj Sharma, Adv

Dharmadhikari J.1. The High Court of Madhya Pradesh vide its impugned judgment dated 26.7.1994 passed in Civil Second Appeal No. 2 of 1981 interfered with the concurrent findings of the courts below and dismissed plaintiffs suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1968

Ghanshyamdas Badrilal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-04-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960 - Sections 3, 3(3), 3(4), 4, 4(1), 5, 15, 38(2) and 38(5); Madhya Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1962 - Rule 54 and 54(1)

Reported in : AIR1969MP186; 1970MPLJ22

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Chitale and ;R.K. Verma, Advs.

Dixit, C.J.1. This order will also govern the disposal of Misc. Petition No. 323 of 1968.2. These are two petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, one by a person carrying on the business of sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial