Advanced Search Results

Ms. Sarita Bali Vs. Union of India, Through the Foreign Secretary, New ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: A.K. Behera, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Priyanka Bhardwaj with M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocates.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) 1. Ms. Sarita Bali, belonging to the 1974 batch of Indian Foreign Service (IFS), the applicant herein, is aggrieved by the orders of the respondents in rejecting her representation for...

Arvind Garg and Another Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Subhash Gosain, Advocate.

Dr. Veena Chhotray, J. 1. The applicants belong to the Central Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Service Group ‘A’. Both the applicants as well as the private respondents No.5 and 6 belong to the 1987 Batch. Whereas...

Abhishek Rawat Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT460

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Bhardwaj, Adv.

ORDERRajendra Menon, J. As common questions are involved in all these four petitions and as the grounds raised arc also similar, therefore all the four petitions are being disposed of by the common order.1. Petitioners in...

D.S. Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Consittution of India - Articles 14, 16, 26 and 39

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ503

Advocate for Appellant : M.K. Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. and; Ajay Abrol, Adv.

ORDERSubject: Implementation of Court order dated 16.2.99 in the SWP No. 518/97 filed by Shri D.S. Ahluwalia,Law Officer Grade-I, Frontier Head Quarters, Jammu. 1. Shri D.S. Ahluwalia, Law Officer, Grade-I, Ftr HQ Jammu filed a SWP...

Shri Dinesh Kumar Manocha Vs. Dda and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant : M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mrs. Alka Sharma, Advocate.

G. George Paracken: The applicant is aggrieved by the Annexure A-3 Charge Memo dated 20.12.2004, Annexure A-1 order of the disciplinary authority dated 04.12.2009 imposing upon him the penalty of ‘reduction of pay by two stages...

Niraj Kumar Vs. the Secretary Government of India, Department of Perso ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant : M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents : T.C. Gupta, Advocate.

G. George Paracken: The applicant is aggrieved by the Annexure A-1 letter No. 5/23/2007-CS.I (U) dated 31st May, 2010 of the Respondent No. 1, namely, Department of Personnel and Training (`DOPandT’ for short) rejecting his representation...

Niranjan Singh Dabaodia and Another Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Nelish Sharma for Arun Bhardwaj, Advocates.

DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY: 1. The OA 3655/2011 and the OA 3618/2011 are being disposed by this common order as they involve common issues of facts and law. The OA 3655/2011 is being taken as the lead...

D.S. Thakur Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Fin ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicant: M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: J.P. Saxena, Advocate.

Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) 1. Shri D.S. Thakur, the applicant herein, was issued the Presidential Order dated 12.05.2010 (Annexure-A1) by imposing the penalty of withholding of 10% of monthly pension for a period of...

Sona Ram Kataria and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, R.N. Singh, R1, Hilal Haider, Advocates.

Oral: Dr. Veena Chhotray, J. 1. The OA 104/2012 and the OA 180/2012 are being disposed by this common order as they involve common issues of facts and law. The OA 104/2012 is being taken as...

Dy. Director of Education and anr. Vs Veena Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Adv.

1. Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YesORDER.1.Questioning the defensibility of...