Advanced Search Results
Darjeeling Commercial Co. Ltd. Vs. Pandam Tea Co. Ltd.
Kolkata
Jan-15-1981
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 439 and 443; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 17, 69 and 95; ;Indian Limitiation Act, 1908 - Section 19; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 18
[1983]54CompCas814(Cal)
Jayanta Mitter, Adv.;T.K. Basu, Adv.
Salil Kumar Roy Chowdhury, J. 1. This is an application for the winding up of the company under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956.2. This petition has a chequered career as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebjani Bose Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-14-2000
ConstitutionService
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226
(2000)2CALLT435(HC)
Mr. R.K. Basu and ;Mr. S.C. Dutta, Advs.
M.H.S. Ansari. J. 1. In the instant writ application, the petitioner has questioned the order dated 3.4.1998 passed by the Chairman, Calcutta District Primary School Council, whereby the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Small Industries Corporation Limited Vs. Industrial Metal Wor ...
Kolkata
Feb-04-1982
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 392, 392(1), 392(2) and 398; ;Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 86
[1984]55CompCas14(Cal)
Tarun K. Basu and ;Sankar Mitra, Advs.
C.K. Banerji, J. 1. This is an appeal from the order dated 19th May, 1977, made by the court below, in an application made by the appellant under Sections 391 and 392 of the Companies Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rajnagar Tea Company Ltd.
Kolkata
May-06-1971
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 35, 49A, 49AA and 49D(3); ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 154
[1973]87ITR669(Cal)
A.K. Basu and ;Suhas Sen, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, J.1. This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee-respondent is a tea company. It has its gardens in East Pakistan in respect whereof agricultural income-tax is payable...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Sudhir Chandra Ray Chaudhuri, an Attorney
Kolkata
Sep-04-1951
Contempt of Court
Rent Act, 1950
AIR1952Cal258,56CWN51
N.K. Basu, ;K.P. Khaitan and ;J.P. Mukherjea, Advs. and ;C.S. Sen, Government Pleader;A.C. Ganguli, ;A.K. Sen and ;S. Roy, Advs.
Harries, C.J.1. Two Rules were issued - one on July 26, 1951 and the other on July 27, 1951-by Mitter J. calling upon Sree Sudir Chandra Ray Chaudhuri, an Attorney of this Court, to show cause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamlal Rajghoria and anr. Vs. Secretary, Govt. of West Bengal
Kolkata
Jul-20-1950
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Section 1; ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 494 and 495
AIR1950Cal545
A.K. Basu, ; J.K. Mukherjee and ; Bireswar Chatterjee, Advs.
Harries, C.J.1. Notice was given to the opposite party who is the Judicial Secretary and Legal Remembrancer of the Government of the State of West Bengal to show cause why he should not be found guilty...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Madhusudan Mills Ltd. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta and ors.
Kolkata
Dec-04-1975
Civil
Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951 - Sections 3, 5(60), 349, 350, 361, 362, 527(17) and 527(18); ;Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1976Cal133,80CWN273
A.K. Basu, ;K. Basu, ;M.P. Choudhari, ;N. Shaw and ;R. Pal, Advs.
Sankar Prasad Mitra, C.J. 1. The appellant claims to be the owner of premises No. 31, Chowringhee Road in Calcutta at the crossing of Chowringhee Road and Park Street. A portion of the premises has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPunjab National Bank Ltd. Vs. Hind Textile Ltd. and ors.
Kolkata
Sep-16-1968
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 19, 20 and 30 to 32 - Schedule - Articles 136 and 183; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 41; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 43
AIR1969Cal390
A.K. Basu, Adv.
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an application by tabular statement dated 22nd February 1968 for execution of a decree by sale of certain shares. On 18th of January, 1948 the Punjab National Bank Ltd, herein referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbdul Gani Haji Habib and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Kolkata
Apr-30-1968
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 24(2)
[1969]72ITR6(Cal)
T.K. Basu, ;P.K. Mazumder and ;J.B. Pal, Advs.
Banerjee, J.1. This reference, under Section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, has been made in circumstances hereinafter related.2. Haji Habib Haji Pirmohammed, now deceased, represented by his legal representatives, Abdul Gani Haji Habib and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabulal Dhandhania Vs. Gauttam and Co.
Kolkata
Aug-12-1949
Contract
Partnership Act, 1932 - Section 69 and 69(3); ; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 2
AIR1950Cal391
K.K. Basu, Adv.
ORDERChatterjee, J.1. This is an application by the petitioner Babulal Dhandhania for setting aside an award made by the Bengal Chamber of Commerce dated 8th April 1949.2. On 9th March 1948, the respondent Gauttam & Co....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »