Advanced Search Results
Ramkrishna Girishchandra Dode and Others Vs. Anand Govind Kelkar and O ...
Mumbai
Oct-12-1999
TenancyProperty
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 13, 14, 15-A, and 28; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 11(2) and 97 - Order 40, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 67 and 73; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955
1998(4)ALLMR491; 1999(1)BomCR63
S.M. Paranjape, ;B.P. Apte, ;A.K. Abhyankar and ;Vhatkar, Advs.
ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri B.P Apte, Addl. Advocate General, Shri A.K. Abhyankar, Shri S.M. Paranjape and Shri Vhatkar for the petitioners and Shri V.A. Thorat for the respondents. 2. Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMulji Umershi Shah and Etc. Vs. Paradisia Builders Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Mumbai
Feb-06-1997
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 94 - Order 39, Rule 1 - Order 40, Rule 1
AIR1998Bom87; 1997(1)ALLMR36; 1997(4)BomCR97; 1997(3)MhLj532
K.K. Singhvi, ;C.J. Sawant, ;Kishore P. Jain and ;Niranjan D. Lapashiya, Advs., i/b., ;Niranjan and Co.
R.M. Lodha, J. 1. This group of six appeals arises out of the order passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay on 2nd November, 1996 in Notice of Motion No. 2608 of 1996 in Suit No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCdr. John. A.R. Deans I.N. and Others Vs. Mr. Anil Kumar Mitra
Mumbai
Mar-08-1999
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13-A1 and A2 and 31-F
1999(3)BomCR364; (1999)2BOMLR283; 1999(2)MhLj330
C.R. Dalvi and ;S.M. Gorwadkar, Advs.
ORDERT.K. Chandrashekhara Das, J.1. The petitioner has impugned in this revision application, the judgment and order dated 21-7-1992 passed by the competent authority, Konkan Division, Bombay in Case No. 12/89. The applicants are the owners of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of State Excise and Ors. Vs. Maharashtra Retail Liquor De ...
Mumbai
Mar-06-2003
Excise
Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949; Maharashtra Potable Liquor (Periodicity and fees for grant, renewal for continuance of Licence) Rules, 1996 - Rules 2 and 4
2003(2)ALLMR799; 2003(5)BomCR185
Shrihari Aney, Special Counsel and ;C.R. Sonawane, Assistant Government Pleader Civil Application Nos. 2578, 2601, 2602, 2603, 2604, 2605, 2606, 2607 and 2608 of 2002 in Writ Petition Nos. 1657, 1818,
C.K. Thakker, C.J.1. Rule. Mrs. Veena Thadani, Mr. Mohan Pungaliya, Mr. J.F. Pochkhanwala, and Mr. A.K. Abhyankar, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice of rule on behalf of original petitioners in all Applications. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeher Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...
Mumbai
Jun-18-2001
ExciseConstitution
Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 105; Constitution of India - Article 14
2002(2)ALLMR440; (2002)1BOMLR372; 2002(3)MhLj36
J.J. Bhat, ;P.A. Savant and ;Arun Siwadh, Advs., i.b., ;Gagrat & Co.;
H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. The 1st petitioner herein is a company engaged in the manufacture of country liquor. The 2nd petitioner is its Managing Director. The 1st petitioner company at the relevant time was engaged in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanchan Amar Asrani Vs. Amar Vishindas Asrani
Mumbai
Aug-09-1995
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 23(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 59, 60, 101, 114 and 115
1996(1)BomCR685; (1995)97BOMLR687
U.J. Makhija, Adv.
A.V. Savant, J.1. Heard both the learned Counsel at length viz. Mr. Makhija for the appellate-wife and Mr. A.K Abhyankar for the respondent-husband.2. This is an appeal by the wife against the judgment and decree dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.A. Puvayya Vs. Shantaram Shamrao Sao (Deceased) through L.R's.
Mumbai
Sep-29-1992
Tenancy
(1993)95BOMLR587
Shri. Walawalkar
V.P. Tipnis, J.1. This is a petition by the original tenant against the decree for possession of the demised premises in favour of the landlords on the ground of bona fide personal requirements of the landlords.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalkisan Jainarayan Jaju (Deceased) through L.R's. Vs. Maniklal Ratanl ...
Mumbai
Nov-07-1993
Tenancy
(1993)95BOMLR181
Bhimrao N. Naik, J.1. Writ Petitioner No. 4136 of 1981 is by the tenant and Writ Petition No. 287 of 1986 is by the landlord arising out of the same judgment and decree passed in Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB.S. Mahajan Since Deceased by His Heirs and Legal Representatives Vs. ...
Mumbai
Oct-28-1987
Property
Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(2) and 13(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 9
1988(3)BomCR535
G.L. Damle, Adv.
M.P. Kenia, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash and set aside the judgment and decree passed on the 21st of October, 1985 by the Appellate...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKusum Shivajirao Babar Nee Kumari Kusum Balwant Shingate Vs. Hirabai B ...
Mumbai
Dec-01-1999
Family
(2000)102BOMLR578
J.A. Patil, J.1. This Appeal, filed by the original plaintiff, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.1.1983 passed in the Special Civil Suit No. 48 of 1978 by the Joint Civil Judge, ST. Division,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »