Advanced Search Results
In Re, Smt. Amina
Mumbai
Aug-02-1991
ConstitutionFamily
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 13, 14, 17, 19(1), 363, 366(22), 368 and 372; Guardian and Wards Act, 1890; Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 51; Government of India Act, 1935; Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1908 - Sections 384 - Order 21, Rule 15(1)
AIR1992Bom214
A.J. Rizvi,;Suraj M. Shah,;S.P. Pandya and;Ms. Nirmala Chugani, Advs. and;A.S. Bobade, Adv. General
ORDER OF REFERENCE1. This petition raises the following important questions of Constitutional law of great public importance:--(a) Whether 'personal laws' are subject to Part III of the Constitution of India?(b) Whether the High Court has no...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSh. Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs.m/s Institute of Hotel Management, Cater ...
Delhi
Apr-02-2018
Land Acquisition
$~57 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:02. 04.2018 W.P. (C) 3070/2018 SH. ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Zaryab J.Rizvi, Advocate with Ms.Firdouse R.Wani and Ms.Ishita...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAli Jawad Ameerhasan Rizvi and Others Vs. Indo French Biotech Enterpri ...
Mumbai
Aug-05-1999
Company
Constitution of India - Article 226
1999(4)ALLMR1; 2000(1)BomCR321; 1999(3)MhLj514
A.J. Rizvi, Adv.
ORDERPer Y.K. Sabharwal, C.J.1. This petition, in public interest, was filed in February, 1998 and is pending since then. Orders passed from time to time clearly show that hours and hours of Court time were spent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ali Jawad Ameerhasan Rizvi and ors. Vs. Indo French Biotech Enterprise ...
Mumbai
Jun-16-1998
Company
Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
[1999]95CompCas373(Bom)
A.J. Rizvi, Adv.
M.B. Shah, C.J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Unfortunately, it appears that there is no legislation which can effectively control the mushrooming of companies which tempt small investors to deposit or invest their life-savings in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Chand and Another Vs. CBI
Delhi
Dec-22-2015
Criminal
1. These appeals are directed against the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 09.8.2012 and 18.8.2012 respectively wherein out of the four appellants three of them namely Satish Kumar Kadian, Inder Singh Rana and Ramesh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›