Advanced Search Results

Hanifa Kitabulla Khan and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Aabad H. Ponda

A.S. Gadkari, J. 1. The appellants have impugned the judgment and order dated 30th October 2007 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.350 of 1999 thereby convicting them under Section 302...

Raju Laxman Pachhapure Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.H.H. Ponda

P.C. 1. By these applications the applicants, apprehending arrest in connection with Crime Nos.137 and 2 of 2014, registered on 15th and 16th September, 2014 respectively with Shivaji Nagar and Shahapur Police Stations, Ichalkaranji, District Kolhapur...

Ashraf HussaIn Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1996CriLJ3147

Advocate for Appellant : A.H.H. Ponda, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. The appellant aggrieved by the Judgment and order dated 13th December 1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, in Sessions Case No. 91 of 1992, convicting and sentencing him to undergo...

Vijay Valia and Etc. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 25(1)

Reported in : 1988(1)BomCR77; (1986)86BOMLR491; 1987MhLJ49

The provisions of Sections 24(5) and 25(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 are not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.Whether an offence is cognizable or non-cognizable, it is an offence against the State....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagan Gagansingh Nepali.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Section 2(e), 2(d), 2(f), 3, 23, 11; Partnership Act - Section 69(3),; Food Products Order (1955) - clause 2(d) (v); Displaced Persons (Verification of Claims) Supplementary Rules, 1954 - Rule 18, Clause (4); Constitution of India - Article 19, 14, 43(1), 42(1),; Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act, 1998 - Section 2(35); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 28, 146, 153A, 400, 401, 413, 506; Companies Act - Section 630(1), 56(1); Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 - Section 15, 12, 5, 3(e),

JUDGMENT : (Per B.R.Gavai, J.) 1. Since the Division Bench of this Court vide its order dated 26th April 2011 passed in Criminal Appeal No.20/2011 has disagreed with the view taken earlier by two Division Benches...

Shri Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: 1. The applicant was the accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 which was decided by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway Court, Pune. The allegation against the applicant was that, he...

Shri Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Oral Judgment: 1. The applicant was the accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 which was decided by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway Court, Pune. The allegation against the applicant was that, he...

Shailesh Kanada and Another Vs. Intelligence Officer, Air Intelligence ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Oral Order: 1. These two applications can be conveniently disposed of by this common order as the applicants in both these applications are accused in one and the same case i.e. NDPS Special Case No.51/13 pending...

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ajay Jagdish Pande and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

AbhayM. Thipsay, J. 1. These two Appeals can be conveniently disposed of by this common order as they take exception to the same order i.e. the order dated 7th October 2011 passed by the Judge of...

Rupam Pralhad Bhartiya Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498-A, 323, 504; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313, 360

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Niteen V . Pradhan; Ms.S.D. Khot; Ms.Ameeta Kuttikrishnan, Advs.

1. Heard rival submissions at length. Also heard learned Advocate Shri Aabad Ponda who was appointed as an amicus curiae to assist the Court considering the technicalities in the matter. Perused the various documents annexed to...