Advanced Search Results
Chandra Kishore Tewari and Others Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Lucknow i ...
Privy Council
Jul-28-1948
Land Acquisition
AIR1949PC207
W.W.K. Page and A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellants; D.V. Pritt, Sir Valentine Holmes, R.K. Handoo and Hon. Gavin A. Slmonds, for Respondents. Solicitors for appellants, T. L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for respondents, Douglas Grant and Co.
Datee of decision: 28/07/1948(Part I) and 01/02/1949 (Part II). PART I: Sir Madhavan Nair: This is an appeal from a judgment and decree of the Full Bench of the Chief Court of Oudh dated 10th May...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhan Kumar Chand and Another Vs. Mohan Lal and Others
Privy Council
May-11-1948
Land Acquisition
AIR1948PC180
A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellants; Dingal Foot, for Respondents. Solicitors for Appellants, Douglas Grant and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents, Hy S.L. Polak and Co.
SIR MADHAVAN NAIR: The appeal arises out of proceedings in execution of the decree in Suit No. 177 of 1924 (remanded), made by the Subordinate Judge of Arrah on 17 - 5 - 1930, which was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskH.H.B. Gill and Another Vs. the King
Privy Council
Feb-17-1948
Land Acquisition
Sir Valentine Holmes and A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellants; Sir Walter Monckton and J. Megan, for The King. Solicitors for Appellants, W.W. Box and Co.; Solicitors for The King, High Commissioner for India.
LORD SIMONDS: This appeal which is brought from a judgment of the Federal Court of India dated 11 - 12 - 1946, raises questions of difficulty and general importance. They relate in the first place to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramanugrah Singh Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Jun-18-1946
Criminal
J.D. Casswell, A.G.P. Pullan and Khalil Ahmed, for Appellant; B.J.M. MacKenna for the Crown. Solicitors for Appellant, Douglas Grant and Dold, Solicitors for the Crown, Solicitor, India Office.
Sir John Beaumont: This is an appeal by special leave from an order of the High Court of Judicature at Patna made on 21st February 1945, convicting the appellant upon a charge of murder under S....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBai Shevantibai Vs. Janardhan Raghunath Warick and Others
Privy Council
May-22-1944
Land Acquisition
Sir T. Strangman and A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellant; C.S. Rewcastle and S.P. Khambatta, for Respondents 8 and 9. Solicitors for Appellant, T.L. Wilson and Co.; Solicitors for Respondents 8 and 9, Hy. S.L. Polak and Co.
Lord Clauson: In the suit which gives rise to the present appeal the appellant as assignee of the purchaser from a member of a joint family of one sixth share in the joint family property, sued...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri 108 Puja Pad Udit Panch Parmeshwar Panchaiti Akhara Udasi Nirwani ...
Privy Council
Jul-27-1944
Land Acquisition
Sir Thomas Strangman and A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellant; Respondents Ex parte. Solicitors for Appellant, Douglas Grant and Dold; Respondents ex parte.
Lord Porter: The appellant in this case is a registered society which carries on the business of money lending. It appeals from a decree of the High Court at Allahabad, dated 8th February 1939, which varied...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChainchal Singh Vs. Emperor
Privy Council
Jul-03-1945
Criminal
A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellant; B. MacKenna, for the Crown. Solicitors for Appellant Douglas Grant and Dold, Solicitors for the Crown; Solicitor, India Office.
Lord Goddard: This is an appeal by special leave from a judgment of the High Court of Lahore dismissing an appeal by the appellant from a conviction for murder by the Additional Sessions Judge of Amritsar....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKunwar Surendra Bahadur Singh and Others Vs. Thakur Behari Singh and O ...
Privy Council
Mar-17-1939
Land Acquisition
A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellants, Respondents Ex parte. Solicitors for Appellants, Douglas Grant and Dold, Respondents Ex parte.
Sir Lancelot Sanderson: This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in the suit against a judgment and decree of the High Court of Allahabad dated 28th November 1933, whereby the appeal of one of the present...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohamed Sugal Esa Mamasan Rer Alalah Vs. the King
Privy Council
Jul-31-1945
Excise
A.G.P. Pullan, for Appellant; F. Gahan for the King. Solicitors for Appellant A.L. Bryden and Co., Solicitors for Respondent Burchells.
Lord Goddard: Their Lordships now give their reasons for the advice they humbly tendered to His Majesty on 31st July that this appeal should be dismissed. The appellant together with his brother Elmi was charged on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurga Prasad and Another Vs. Ghanshiam Das and Others
Privy Council
Apr-06-1948
Land Acquisition
A.G.P. Pullan and J.M.R. Jayakar, for Appellants (Durga Prasad, Gaya Prasad and Mt. Har Piari). Dingle Foot, for Yad Ram; C.S. Rewcastle, S.P. Khambatta and Gavin Simonds, for Respondent (Ghanshiam Das). Solicitors for Appellants, Barrow Rogers and Nevill
Lord Simonds: These consolidated appeals from a judgment and decree of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which varied a judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge at Aligarh, have involved the close scrutiny of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »