Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a dorairaj · Page 1 of about 93 results (0.080 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 23 1958

P.M. Swamy Vs. K. Sultan Mohideen

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-1958

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : (1958)1MLJ355

1. The second appeals came up before us on a reference by one of us, as the main question involved, the extent to which Section 73 of the Trade Marks Act governed the forum for instituting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2023

N.Shajahan vs District Collector

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-04-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 PETITIONERS:1 N.SHAJAHAN AGED 44 YEARS S/O NOOR MUHAMMED ABBAS, PROPRIETOR,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 1989

Seethalakshmi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-17-1989

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 347, 364, 365 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 156, 157, 170, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 173(8), 175 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 36 and 551

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1037

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ravi, Adv.

ORDER1. This case discloses a lamentable state of affairs. A tale of woe has unfolded itself revealing how the principal characters who are high ranking police officials in charge of the District of Coimbatore in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 1988

A.S. Periasamy, Proprietor, Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-24-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1988)(17)LC260Tri(Delhi)

1. In this matter, it has been held that the appellant had cleared 1,50,38,920 Nos. of biris without bringing them into Cental Excise accounts and without payment of duty. Accordingly, the department has demanded duty of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 1999

C.C. Ex. Vs. Panyan Cement and Mineral Indus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Sep-03-1999

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2000)(115)ELT797Tri(Chennai)

1. This reference application has been filed by the Revenue against the Final Order No. 866/98, dated 8-5-1998 wherein Modvat Credit was allowed on refractory bricks even prior to 16-3-1995 on which date vide Notification No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 1992

S. Varadarajan Vs. Venkateswara Solvent Extraction (P.) Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : May-12-1992

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(1), 53(3), 53(4), 169, 169(6), 172, 173, 173(2), 189, 262, 265, 284, 397, 398, 399(3) and 408

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas693(Mad); (1992)IIMLJ130

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. K. Mylsamy

Lakshmanan, J.1. The first petitioner, S. Varadarajan, in the main company petition is the applicant in Company Application No. 602 of 1992. He filed the above application for an order of interim injunction restraining the second...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1968

K. Dakshinamoorthy Vs. District Signal Telecommunication Engineer (Wor ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-1968

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103; Railway Establishment Code (Conduct and Discipline Rules for Railway Subordinates) - Rule 1712

Reported in : AIR1969Mad201; (1969)ILLJ351Mad

Advocate for Appellant : Anantan Nair, Adv. for ;P.N. George and ;P. Shanta Bai, Advs.

ORDERRamakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner, K. Dakshinamoorthy was employed as a Khalasi in the Signal and Telecommunication Shop in the Southern Railway. He was drawing a pay of Rs. 72/- at the time when the Railway Authorities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1968

K. Dakshinamoorthy Vs. the District Signal Tele-communication Engineer ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-1968

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1968)2MLJ191

ORDERP. Ramakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner, K. Dakshinamoorthy was employed as a Khalas in the Signal and Tele-Communication Shop in the Southern Railway. He was drawing a pay of Rs. 72 at the time when the Railway...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 2017

Royal Sundaram Aliance Vs. Mr Dorairaj Pillay

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-03-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF JANUARY2017PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8384 OF2012CONNECTED WITH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2000

Dr. T.M. Jayarama Reddy and Others Vs. Bingi Sreeramaiah Chetty and Ot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-29-2000

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16, 20 and 22; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54 and 56; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113

Reported in : 2000(4)ALD136; 2000(4)ALT81

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Challa Seetharamaiah for M. Adinarayana Raju and;Mr. C. Poornaiah, Advs.

ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment and decree passed in OS No.1 of 1997 on the file of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, decreeing the suit filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial