Advanced Search Results
P.M. Swamy Vs. K. Sultan Mohideen
Chennai
Jan-23-1958
Intellectual Property Rights
(1958)1MLJ355
1. The second appeals came up before us on a reference by one of us, as the main question involved, the extent to which Section 73 of the Trade Marks Act governed the forum for instituting...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.Shajahan vs District Collector
Kerala
Dec-04-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 PETITIONERS:1 N.SHAJAHAN AGED 44 YEARS S/O NOOR MUHAMMED ABBAS, PROPRIETOR,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeethalakshmi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Chennai
Oct-17-1989
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342, 347, 364, 365 and 420; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 156, 157, 170, 173, 173(1), 173(2), 173(8), 175 and 482; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 36 and 551
1991CriLJ1037
K. Ravi, Adv.
ORDER1. This case discloses a lamentable state of affairs. A tale of woe has unfolded itself revealing how the principal characters who are high ranking police officials in charge of the District of Coimbatore in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
A.S. Periasamy, Proprietor, Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-24-1988
Land Acquisition
(1988)(17)LC260Tri(Delhi)
1. In this matter, it has been held that the appellant had cleared 1,50,38,920 Nos. of biris without bringing them into Cental Excise accounts and without payment of duty. Accordingly, the department has demanded duty of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.C. Ex. Vs. Panyan Cement and Mineral Indus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-03-1999
Excise
(2000)(115)ELT797Tri(Chennai)
1. This reference application has been filed by the Revenue against the Final Order No. 866/98, dated 8-5-1998 wherein Modvat Credit was allowed on refractory bricks even prior to 16-3-1995 on which date vide Notification No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Varadarajan Vs. Venkateswara Solvent Extraction (P.) Ltd. and Other ...
Chennai
May-12-1992
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(1), 53(3), 53(4), 169, 169(6), 172, 173, 173(2), 189, 262, 265, 284, 397, 398, 399(3) and 408
[1994]80CompCas693(Mad); (1992)IIMLJ130
Mr. A. K. Mylsamy
Lakshmanan, J.1. The first petitioner, S. Varadarajan, in the main company petition is the applicant in Company Application No. 602 of 1992. He filed the above application for an order of interim injunction restraining the second...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Dakshinamoorthy Vs. District Signal Telecommunication Engineer (Wor ...
Chennai
Jan-31-1968
Civil
Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 13 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 103; Railway Establishment Code (Conduct and Discipline Rules for Railway Subordinates) - Rule 1712
AIR1969Mad201; (1969)ILLJ351Mad
Anantan Nair, Adv. for ;P.N. George and ;P. Shanta Bai, Advs.
ORDERRamakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner, K. Dakshinamoorthy was employed as a Khalasi in the Signal and Telecommunication Shop in the Southern Railway. He was drawing a pay of Rs. 72/- at the time when the Railway Authorities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Dakshinamoorthy Vs. the District Signal Tele-communication Engineer ...
Chennai
Jan-31-1968
Service
(1968)2MLJ191
ORDERP. Ramakrishnan, J.1. The petitioner, K. Dakshinamoorthy was employed as a Khalas in the Signal and Tele-Communication Shop in the Southern Railway. He was drawing a pay of Rs. 72 at the time when the Railway...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoyal Sundaram Aliance Vs. Mr Dorairaj Pillay
Karnataka
Jan-03-2017
Land Acquisition
1 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE03D DAY OF JANUARY2017PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL No.8384 OF2012CONNECTED WITH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. T.M. Jayarama Reddy and Others Vs. Bingi Sreeramaiah Chetty and Ot ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-29-2000
ContractProperty
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16, 20 and 22; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 54 and 56; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 113
2000(4)ALD136; 2000(4)ALT81
Mr. Challa Seetharamaiah for M. Adinarayana Raju and;Mr. C. Poornaiah, Advs.
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment and decree passed in OS No.1 of 1997 on the file of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, decreeing the suit filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »