Advanced Search Results
i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-04-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(62)ECC591
1. These appeals have been filed against Order-in-Original No. 3/95, dated 29-12-1995 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi.Following are the particulars of the appellants :______________________________________________________________Appeal No. Name of the appellant Referred to asE/ 209/...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArnit Das Vs. State of Bihar Overruled
Supreme Court of India
May-09-2000
Criminal
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 17, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 and 63; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; The U.N. Standard Minimum Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 20 (1), 141 and 253; Children Act, 1960; WB Children Act, 1959 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164
AIR2000SC2264; 2000(2)ALD(Cri)22; 2000CriLJ2971; JT2000(6)SC320; 2000(4)SCALE515; (2000)5SCC488; [2000]Supp1SCR69; 2000(2)LC1062(SC)
U.R. Lalit, Sr. Adv.;N.R. Choudhary; Jai Prakash Pandey; Somnath Mukherjee, Advs
R.C. Lahoti, J.1. On 5-9-1998, Crime No. 574/98 under Section 302, I.P.C. was registered at P.S. Kadamkuan, Patna. According to the FIR, one Abhishek was shot dead on that day. On 13-9-1998 the petitioner was arrested...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJogdamba Koer Vs. Secretary of State for India in Council
Kolkata
Jan-31-1889
FamilyProperty
(1889)ILR16Cal368
W. Comer Petheram, C.J. and Banerjee, J.1. The plaintiff (appellant) contends that she is entitled to the properties in dispute as well by inheritance as by right of survivorship, and that, consequently, there can be no...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Philips Carbon Black Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Aug-07-2002
Service Tax
(2003)(151)ELT621Tri(Kol.)kata
1. M/s. Philips Carbon Black Ltd. have filed this appeal being aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals).2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants are engaged in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhanwar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Jul-03-2006
Narcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 18, 20, 35, 41(1), 41(2), 42, 42(2), 50, 54, 55, 57 and 67; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154 to 157, 294, 374(2), 295, 313 and 391
2006CriLJ3585; RLW2006(3)Raj2459; 2006(4)WLC425
Sridhar Purohit, Adv.
H.R. Panwar, J.1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'the Code' hereinafter) is directed against the judgment and order dated 11.7.2003 passed by Special Judge (NDPS Cases),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Chakraborty and ors. Vs. Serampore Municipality
Kolkata
May-12-1988
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Section 205 and 205(1); ;Bengal Municipal Act, 1932 - Section 501
(1988)2CALLT154(HC),93CWN45
B.C. Roy and ;S.L. Hazra, Advs.
Sankar Bhattacharyya, J.1. The petitioners in this Rule are co-owners of premises No. 155, Netaji Subhas Avenue, Serampore. Sometime in 1981, they submitted to the Serampore Municipality for sanction a plan for carrying out certain additions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUco Bank Vs. Union of India and ors.
Kolkata
May-13-2014
MRTP
WP No.274 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE UCO BANK Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN Date : 13th May, 2014. Appearance: Mr.Soumya Majumder,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBama Metal Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jan-05-1994
Service Tax
(1996)(82)ELT81TriDel
1. In both these appeals, common questions of law and facts are involved. Hence, they are taken up together for disposal as per law.2. Both these appeals arise [from] a common order-in-appeal passed by the Collector...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Basudev Choudhury Vs. C.C., Kolkata
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
May-02-2001
Direct Taxation
1. The appellant is aggrieved with the imposition of personal penalty of Rs.15,000/- imposed by the impugned order. Shri G.C. Sarkar, learned Advocate submits that appellant is a poor person and fills pry to the monetary...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKasa Impex Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Oct-30-2001
Land Acquisition
1. The appellant duly represented by Shri G.C. Sarkar, ld. Advocate is praying for dispensing with the condition of predepoist of penalty amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- imposed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise Calcutta and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »