Advanced Search Results

Sqdn. Ldr. D.D. Upadhayay and Others Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Cor ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Civil Procedur Code, 1908 - Order 33, Rule 41; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Fatal Accidents Act, 1955 - Sections 1-A and 2

Reported in : 1992ACJ929

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Gambhir, Adv

1. This appeal, filed by the claimants against the award given on 6th April, 1969 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Delhi (for short the MACT), raises questions as to the adequacy of the compensation awarded,...

D.D. Upadhayaya and ors. Vs. Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corpor ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 33

Reported in : AIR1993Delhi57; 46(1992)DLT570; 1992(22)DRJ455

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Gambhir and; I.S. Mathur, Advs

Santosh Duggal, J.(1) This appeal, filed by the claimants against the award given on 6th April, 1979 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Delhi (for short the MACT), raises questions as to the adequacy of the...

Parkashwati and anr. Vs. Amar Prakash and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 372; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : AIR1980Delhi298; 18(1980)DLT394; ILR1981Delhi53

Advocate for Appellant : C.B. Thanai,; A.C. Gambhir and; J.P. Jain, Advs

Sultan Singh, J.(1) The question for decision is : 'WHETHERan appeal lies under clause X of the Letters Patent from the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court condoning delay in filing the first...

State Bank of India Vs. Vipul Enterprises and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 139

Reported in : 1995(34)DRJ233

Advocate for Appellant : J.L. Kalra,; Anis Ahmed and; A.C. Gambhir, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) State Bank of India has sought recovery of Rs.4,64,655.73P from M/s Vipul Enterprises basing its claim on the cash credit facilities provided to the said Firm under the provisions of Credit to...

Satyawati Sharma (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : TenancyConstitution

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 3, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 11, 11A, 11A(2), 12, 14 and 14(1); East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(1) and 13(3); East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1956; Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 22 and 29(2); Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1941 - Sections 10(1) and 10(2); Delhi and Ajmer-Merwara Rent Control Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 13 and 13(1); Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 13 and 13(1); Constitution of India (Seventy-Fifth Amendment) Act, 1994; Punjab Medical Registration Act, 1916; Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 10, 10(1), 10(2), 13 and 19(1); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Houses, Rates Control Act, 1947; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Contr

Reported in : AIR2008SC3148; 2008(3)ALD147(SC); 2008(56)BLJR1811; 148(2008)DLT705(SC); JT2008(5)SC376; 2008(6)SCALE325; (2008)5SCC287; 2008(3)ICC326; 2008(3)Supreme37; 2008AIRSCW3324; 2008AIRSCW3324; 2008(3)ICC326; 2008(3)Supreme37

Advocate for Appellant : C.S. Rajan and; T.S. Doabia, Sr. Advs.,; A.C. Gambhir,;

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short 'the 1958 Act') is ultra vires the doctrine of equality enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India is the...

Uoi & Ors vs.s.d. Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

$~R-10. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4101/2002 % Judgment dated 21st November, 2016 UOI & ORS Through : Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC, ........ Petitioners and Mr.Himansak Bhardwaj, Adv. versus...

R.C. Dua S/O Dhalu Ram, Health and Vs. Shri V.N. Mathur, General

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

1. Through this petition applicant has alleged wilful and deliberate non-compliance of Tribunal's directions contained in order dated 12.7.2005 whereby OA No. 923/2005 was disposed of quashing and setting aside the impugned orders and directing the...

Mohd. Yususf Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 19; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 - Rule 102

Reported in : 6(1970)DLT371

Advocate for Appellant : O.P. Malhotra,; A.B. Saharia and; D.K. Kapur, Advs

Rajindar Sachar, J.(1) This petition under under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenges the issuance of notice of eviction issued to the petitioners under Section 19 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and...

Sqn. Ldr. D.D. Upadhayay and ors. Vs. U.P. State R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : 1(1992)ACC560

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.C. Gambhir

Santosh Duggal, J.1. This appeal, filed by the claimants against the award given on 6th April, 1979 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Delhi (for short the MACT), raises questions as to the adequacy of the...

J.C. Khosia Vs. Khosla Medical Institute and Research Society Etc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 39, Rules 2-A and 3

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(Delhi)109; 1996(37)DRJ654

Advocate for Appellant : A.C. Gambhir,; Sanjay Karol and; Manoj Arora, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J.(1) This is plaintiffs application under order 39 Rule 2-A Cpc, for proceedings against respondents Nos.1 and 2, who were defendant Nos. 2 and 4 in the suit, and against respondent Nos.3,4 and 5,...