Advanced Search Results
Smt. N. Taneja and Another Vs. Calcutta Distt. Forum and Others
Kolkata
Sep-18-1991
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 1, 2, 2(O)(2), 10, 10(1), 13, 13(5), 14(2), 15, 19, 23, 27 and 28;; West Bangal Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rules 3(5), 3(7), 3(8), 5(4), 5(5), 5(10) and 8(8);; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 22, 226, 227 and 245;; Management of Recognised Non-Government Institutions Rules, 1969 - Rule 28;; West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act, 1963 - Sections 2 and 28(8);; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 13(4), 30 and 32;; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228;; Arbitration Act - Sections 4(6) and 41;; Benaras Hindu University Act, 1915;; Aligarh Muslim University Act, 1920;; Viswa Bharati University Act, 1951 - Section 3;; Contract Act - Section 2;
AIR1992Cal95,(1992)1CALLT234(HC)
ORDER1. The petitioners have moved the writ application challenging the C.D.F. Case No. 900 of 1990 or another case with the cause-title of Mahangilal Barmecha v. M.Taneza and another pending before the Calcutta District Forum as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatyendra Kumar Tripathi and Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and anr. Etc.
Allahabad
Dec-23-2004
ConstitutionCommercial
Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 4 to 12, 13, 15 and 15(1A); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 15(1), 15(4), 19(1), 19(6), 29, 39 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules, 1963 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 9, 9A, 9(1), 9(2), 9(2)(3), 17, 23, 53 and 53A; Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) (Amendment) Rules, 1983 - Rule 9(2); Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5A
AIR2005All147
Satya Prakash Singh, ;Gaurab K. Banerji, ;Pankaj Mithal, ;Deo Prakash Singh, ;J.M. Khan, ;R.K. Gupta, ;V.B. Upadhyay and ;Mukesh Prasad, Advs.
A.P. Sahi, J.1. The challenge in the present writ petitions is to the 26th and 27th Amendment Rules introduced in the year 2004 in Uttar Pradesh Minor Mineral (Concession) Rules 1963, whereby preferential rights have been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYudhishter Vs. Ashok Kumar
Supreme Court of India
Dec-11-1986
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 15(4); Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR1987SC558; JT1986(1)SC1021; 1986(2)SCALE1044; (1987)1SCC204; [1987]1SCR516
P.K. Banerji and; V.C. Mahajan,; Urmila Kapoor and;
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This appeal by special leave is from the decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court dated 10th Janaury, 1980. The appellant is the tenant. The appeal arises out of the summary dismissal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bhagwan Singh and ors. Vs. Bhagwan Singh, Minor Under the Guardianship ...
Allahabad
Dec-31-1969
Family
(1895)ILR17All294
Banerji, J.1. The suit in which this appeal has arisen was brought by the respondents for the establishment of their right as reversioners to the estate of one Madho Singh, and for a declaration that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Sales Tax Vs. M/s. Klip Nail Care
Mumbai
Mar-15-2016
Sales Tax
Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. In all these applications, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law for opinion and answer of this court:- Whether on facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDebi Das and anr. Vs. Mukat Behari Lal and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-01-1942
Family
AIR1943All177
Dar, J.1. This is an appeal against a judgment and decree, dated 24th August 1936 of the Subordinate Judge of Bareilly in a suit for possession of immovable property and for recovery of its mesne profits....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRameshwar Vs. Gobind Prasad and anr.
Allahabad
Jan-26-1925
Civil
AIR1925All473; 87Ind.Cas.426
Mukerji, J.1. This is a revision filed at the instance of the complainant asking this Court to set aside an order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Cawnpore and to restore the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Kumar Shrivastava and ors. Vs. Ram Lal and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jan-08-2008
Service
Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Officers (Grade II) Service Rules, 1983 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(I), 5, 5(1), 15 and 18(4); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Officers Rules, 1977; Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Function) Regulations, 1954 - Regulations 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Officers (Grade II) Service (Amendment) Rules, 1987; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 163, 309, 320 and 320(3)
2008(1)SCALE176; (2008)3SCC148; 2008(2)SLJ430(SC); 2008LABIC2041
Shail Kumar Dwivedi, Addl. Adv. Gen., U.P.,; M.N. Rao,; Gou
Altamas Kabir, J.1. These three appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 20.9.2006 passed by the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court disposing of several Writ petitions filed by the appellants in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Jaunpur Sugar Factory Ltd.
Allahabad
May-13-1925
Company
AIR1925All658
Mukerji, J.1. The liquidators of the Jaunpur Sugar Factory, Limited, in liquidation placed, for the decision of the Court the objection on the part o the firm, Lallu Mal Ramchunder to be put on the list...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChatarbhuj Vs. Harnandan Lal
Allahabad
Jul-19-1927
Property
AIR1928All108; 108Ind.Cas.141
Boys, J.1. The dispute in connexion with which this civil revision arises has already been before this Court and the matter then in dispute was the subject of Civil Revision No. 125 of 1925, decided on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »