Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: a b patil · Page 1 of about 1,557 results (0.300 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 08 1995

State of Karnataka Vs. Nagesh Alias Ramesh

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-08-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 392

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3816; ILR1995KAR2030; 1995(5)KarLJ510

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Patil, Addl. S.P.P.

Mirdhe, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the State against the judgment passed by the J.M.F.C., Yellapura, in Criminal Case No. 699 of 1992 acquitting the respondent-accused of the offence punishable under Section 392, I.P.C. 2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1995

The State of Karnataka Vs. Shabuddin

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-20-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 378(1) and (3); Evidence Act - Sections 118

Reported in : 1995(2)ALT(Cri)328; 1995CriLJ3237; ILR1995KAR1507; 1995(2)KarLJ168

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A.B. Patil, Addl. S.P.P.

Mirdhe, J. 1. This criminal appeal is preferred by the State under S. 378(1) and (3) of Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 13-4-1993 passed, by the Sessions Judge, Raichur, in S.C. No. 38/1992 acquitting the respondent-accused...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1995

The State of Karnataka (Kanakagiri P.S.) Vs. Doragal Kanakappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-24-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 329

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT(Cri)605; 1996CriLJ599; ILR1995KAR2777; 1995(4)KarLJ158

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Patil, Addl. State Public Prosecutor

Mirdhe, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the State-appellant against the judgment dated 20-10-93 passed by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Raichur, in S.C. 58/87 acquitting the respondent-accused of the offence punishable under section 307, I.P.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 11 2010

Sri.Sri.Balayogi Madhumayananda Swamiji Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-11-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306

Advocate for Appellant : Sri.A.B.Patil,; M/s.Mylaraiah, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is arrayed as accused in Crime No. 147/2010, registered for an offence punishable under section 306 IPC.2. I have heard Sri A.B.Patil, learned senior counsel for petitioner and Sri Vijaykumar Majage learned HCGP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2016

Gangadhar and Others Vs. Somashekhar and Others

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Aug-20-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ashok B.Patil

(Prayer: This Regular First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 5.12.2011 passed in O.S.No.88/2007 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2007

Suleman Abbas S/O Chiragali Hydary Vs. Pramod S/O Nandlal Yadav,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-22-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 16(1); Maharashtra Municipal Corporations and Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships (Second Amendment) Act, 1995; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act - Sections 11 and 12; Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 175(1); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2008Bom7; 2007(5)ALLMR255; 2008(1)BomCR887

Advocate for Appellant : P.B. Patil, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. As issue involved in this Letters Patent Appeal is found to be squarely covered by judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court, We have heard parties finally with their consent by making Rule returnable forthwith....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1993

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Jagannath Atmaram Patil

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 392, 397 and 411

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR218

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Patil, Public Prosecutor

M.F. Saldanha, J. 1. The facts of this case are both gory and gruesome. A six year old girl belonging to village Dhavde appears to have been given in marriage by her parents in a typical...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1996

Grama Seva Pratishthana and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-09-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 - Rule 7(3)

Reported in : ILR1998KAR116

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok B. Patil, Adv.

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. In this petition, the first petitioner claims to be a Charitable Trust registered under the provisions of the Indian Trust Act and is represented by its Trustee-Shri T. Ashok Pai. and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 19 2011

Ritesh Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

Decided on : Nov-19-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Prakash Yeli, Veeresh B. Patil, Advocates. For the Respondent: Smt. Anuradha M. Desai, Addl. SPP.

Aravind Kumar, J 1. These petitions are disposed off by a common order since the respondent/ complainant has filed complaint under section 200 Cr.P.C, 1973 against the respondents before the Jurisdictional Court to take cognizance of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2015

Vinayak Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Departmen ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-26-2015

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. P. B. Patil, Mr. Patil

A.B. Chaudhari, J. 1. By the present petition, the petitioner claims declaration that his age of retirement or superannuation be declared as 60 years, with all consequential benefits. FACTS: 2. The date of birth of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial