Advanced Search Results

Sridhar Shetty and ors. Vs. Narayana Naika

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 26, Rule 9 - Order 41, Rule 27 and 27(1)

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4494; 2005(5)KarLJ458

Advocate for Appellant : Sampat Anand Shetty, Adv.

ORDERAjit J. Gunjal, J.1. This petition is by the respondents in RA 52/90. The respondent herein is the appellant in the said R.A. and also the plaintiff in the suit. Suit in O.S. No. 121/88 is...

Xavier Ferrao S/O Anthony Ferrao and Celsestine Ferrao W/O Anthony Fer ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 20, Rule 12

Reported in : 2007(4)KCCR2249; 2007(5)AIRKarR523; AIR2007NOC2436

Advocate for Appellant : Sampat Anand Shetty, Adv.

V. Jagannathan, J.1. The plaintiffs before the trial Court are the appellants herein and they are aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit filed by them by the trial Court and the said judgment and decree...

Smt. Ganga Rao K. and Others Vs. V. Bhaskar Rao and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 20, Rule 18(2)

Reported in : ILR2000KAR1026; 2000(3)KarLJ610

Advocate for Appellant : Sri Sampath Anand Shetty, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against the order dated 30-3-1999 of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Udupi in F.D.P. No. 6 of 1998. Revision petitioners are...

Nana and Others Vs. Prabhakar

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

1) This proceeding is filed against the judgment and decree of Rent Suit No.8 of 2007 and Rent Appeal No.2 of 2012. The suit filed by the respondent, landlord, for eviction is decided in his favour...

Sri Chandra Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.118 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF2021...

Sri Rangaswamy @ Ranga (a1) Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.118 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF2021...

Sri C Govindaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.118 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF2021...

K. Srinivas Ganiga Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE26H DAY OF JUNE, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.1912 OF2023(GM - RES) BETWEEN: K.SRINIVAS GANIGA S/O LATE BACHA...

H.R. Sundera Murthy and Another Vs. State Government of Karnataka, Foo ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10(1)(3); Consumer Protection (Amended) Act, 1993; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 217(1), 226, 227 and 233(2)

Reported in : ILR1999KAR1805; 1999(2)KarLJ525

Advocate for Appellant : Sri H.R. Viswanath, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition is filed in 'Public Interest' under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners, who are practicing Advocates praying for a writ of mandamus to declare the appointment of...

M. Ramakrishnaiah and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionService

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2322; 2005(4)KarLJ229

Advocate for Appellant : V. Lakshminarayana, ;N.B. Patil, ;Ranganatha S. Jois, ;M.V. Hoskoti, ;Mallikarjuna S. Adagal, ;K. Govindaraj and ;M. Sampath Kumar, Advs. and Shivayogimath Associate

ORDERSreedhar Rao, J.1. The Petitioners in WP Nos. 522-529/03 are employed as daily wage workers in different APMC's under the jurisdiction of the second Respondent.2. The petitioners in WP Nos. 25058-60/04 and other batch of cases...