Advanced Search Results
Huvappa Mahadev Mense Vs. Land Tribunal
Karnataka
Aug-10-1987
PropertyCivil
Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 - Sections 4, 8, 45, 45A, 108 and 142; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 87A and 88; Mysore Act, 1957 - Sections 5
ILR1987KAR2797; 1987(2)KarLJ327
N.A. Mandgi, Adv.
Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. These appeals are by Huvappa, the petitioner, in W.P. Nos. 6517 and 7971 of 1977. He claimed the status of a tenant entitled to registration as an occupant under Section 45 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSreenivas Lad Vs. Ekanath and ors.
Karnataka
Aug-22-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 40, Rule 1
AIR2005Kant405; 2005(6)KarLJ62
G.S. Visweswara, Sr. Adv. for ;V. Srinivasa Raghavan for ;Indus Law, Advs.
Anand Byrareddy, J.1. This is a plaintiffs appeal against the dismissal of his application tinder Order 40, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC' for brevity).2. The facts are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdishayya Kadayya Kadadevaru and anr. Vs. Dundayya Gurushiddayya Hirem ...
Karnataka
Jan-22-1982
Trusts and Societies
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 22, 22A, 72(4), 79, 79(1) and 80; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9 and 107
AIR1983Kant79; 1982(1)KarLJ402
B.V. Jigjinni, Adv.
Sabhahit, J. 1. This appeal under Section 72(4) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') is by Trustees and is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-4-1978, passed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The State Vs. Vithal Maruti Patil
Mumbai
Jan-13-1953
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 417 and 423; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 286, 302 and 307
AIR1953Bom369; (1953)55BOMLR379; ILR1953Bom1242
A.A. Mandgi, Asst. Govt. Pleader
In an appeal against acquittal under Section 417 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, the High Court can interfere with the finding impeached, if the High Court comes to the conclusion that not only is the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBabu Ningappa Yalgundri and ors. Vs. Arunkumar Alias Basappa and ors.
Karnataka
Oct-12-1987
FamilyProperty
Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 4, 7, 8, 12; ;Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Sections 14
AIR1988Kant139; ILR1987KAR3590
N.A. Mandgi, Adv.
Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This appeal is by defendants 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 who are appellants 1 to 5 this Court. They have suffered a Judgment and Decree in O.S.No. 41/1966 on the file of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRama Shidappa Thorali and ors. Vs. State
Mumbai
Nov-26-1951
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 395 and 411
AIR1952Bom299; (1952)54BOMLR316; ILR1952Bom662
A.A. Mandgi, Adv.
Chagla, C.J.(3) Nine accused were tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Belgaum, with a jury, for having committed an offence under Section 395 and in the alternative under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Alisaheb Kashim Tamboli
Mumbai
Sep-17-1954
Labour and IndustrialCriminal
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 2(1), 18(2), 18(4), 27, 34, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 59, 60, 62(1), 64, 79, 79(1), 83, 85, 85(1), 85(2), 92, 103 and 112; Factories Rules - Rules 35, 37, 94 and 95; Factories Act, 1911 - Sections 2(2); Factories (Amendment) Act, 1937 - Sections 151(4)
AIR1955Bom209; (1955)57BOMLR135; 1955CriLJ932; ILR1955Bom624; (1955)IILLJ182Bom
A.A. Mandgi, Asst. Govt. Pleader
Dixit, J.1. This is a group of four appeals, each of which arises from a distinct set of facts but all of which raise common questions under the Factories Act, 1948. Before setting out the questions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghavendra P. Mudhol Vs. Hanamant R. Kulkarni
Karnataka
May-29-1985
Tenancy
Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 3 and 21(1); Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 2(6A) and 10(3)
AIR1986Kant219; ILR1985KAR2362; 1985(2)KarLJ287
Anant N. Mandgi, Adv.
ORDER1. This revision petition is by the tenant against the order of the learned District Judge, Belgaum, in HRC. RP. No. 137/82 on his file.2. The revision before the District Judge was preferred by the unsuccessful...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Rao Saheb Mahadev Gayakwad and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation ...
Karnataka
Jun-08-2004
Insurance
Insurance Act, 1938 - Sections 45
AIR2004Kant439; ILR2004KAR3390; 2004(7)KarLJ289
Ananth Mandgi and ;Satish G. Raikar, Advs.
ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This Writ Petition is presented against the Life Insurance Corporation of India challenging the action on the part of the respondent Corporation in repudiating the contract between one Appasaheb M Gayakwad who...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKishan Vs. Sakharabai
Karnataka
Aug-05-1987
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Hindu Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 5, 11, 18 and 25
ILR1987KAR3422; 1987(2)KarLJ357
V. Krishnamurthi, Senior Adv. and ;N.A. Mandgi, Adv. ;Mahableshwar Goud, Adv. for ;Shivaraj Patil, Adv.
Nesargi, J.This is defendant's appeal. The respondents filed O.S. No. 155 of 1978 in the Court of the Munsiff, Basavakalyan, under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as H.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »