Advanced Search Results
The Public Prosecutor Vs. Pedimonu Beary
Chennai
Wallace, J.
Feb-15-1928
Land Acquisition
114Ind.Cas.238
Wallace, J.1. This appeal is by Government against the acquittal of an accused by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mangalore. The facts of the case, so far as are necessary for the decision of this appeal, may be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.A. Kaleek Alias James Cooper Vs. Emperor
Chennai
Wallace, J.
Dec-20-1926
Criminal
AIR1927Mad544; 101Ind.Cas.484
Wallace, J.1. The first point raised in the appeal is that the Madras Court had no jurisdiction. The facts, for the purpose of the argument, are that accused sent from Madras by value payable parcel to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMagdoom Mahamad Marakayar Vs. Bansi Lal Minor Through His Mother and N ...
Chennai
Walter Schwabe, C.J. and ;Wallace, J.
Aug-31-1922
Land Acquisition
71Ind.Cas.855
Walter Schwabe, C.J.1. I agree with the judgment of Wallace, J., which I have had the opportunity reading and have nothing to add.Wallace, J.2. The contest in this appeal concerns certain houses, Nos. 100, 101 Thambu...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Kanniappa Chettiar and ors. Vs. K. Ramachandraiyar and ors.
Chennai
Walter Salis Schwabe, C.J. and; Wallace, J.
Dec-17-1923
Land Acquisition
AIR1924Mad731; 79Ind.Cas.92
Walter Salis Schwabe, C.J.1. These are appeals from the decrees of the city Civil Court for ejectment and mesne profits. The plaintiff is a lessee from the trustees of a temple of the lands in question...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMatti Venkanna and Eleven ors.
Mumbai
Wallace, J.
Nov-15-1922
Criminal
(1923)ILR46Bom257
Wallace, J.1. The only point raised in this petition is that the conviction under Sections 143 and 447 of the Indian Penal Cede was illegal since the offence under Section 447, Indian Penal Cede, was compounded.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagannatha Sastri Vs. Sarathambal Ammal and Two ors.
Mumbai
Wallace, J.
Nov-30-1922
Civil
(1923)ILR46Bom574
Wallace, J.1. In this case the lower Court has refused to issue a commission for the examination of two of the petitioner's witnesses, who live more than 200 miles from the Courthouse, and cannot therefore be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHealth Inspector, Taluk Board Vs. Govinda Padayachi and ors.
Chennai
Wallace, J.
Feb-23-1898
Land Acquisition
112Ind.Cas.591
ORDERWallace, J.1. This series of revision petitions is presented, on behalf of the Taluk Board, Kumbakonam, asking this Court to revise the order of the Sub-Magistrate, Tiruvadamarudur, dismissing a series of complaints under b, 203, Criminal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Muthiah Chetty
Chennai
Wallace, J.
Dec-11-1923
Criminal
81Ind.Cas.44
ORDERWallace, J.1. No Magistrate or Court can refuse to allow an accused person to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, before charge is framed, and the Magistrate's procedure in refusing to allow such cross-examination was most irregular and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Mathi Venkanna
Chennai
Wallace, J.
Nov-15-1922
Land Acquisition
71Ind.Cas.242
ORDERWallace, J.1. The only point raised in this petition is that the conviction under Sections 143 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code was illegal, since the offence under Section 447, Indian Penal Code, was compounded.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Gopalaswami Iyer Vs. O.S. Ramachandra Iyer, Official Receiver
Chennai
Wallace, J.
Dec-12-1922
Criminal
AIR1923Mad503; 72Ind.Cas.137
Wallace, J.1. Petitioner seeks for revision of the order of the lower Court excusing the delay of 8 months by the Official Receiver, Tanjore, in bringing on record the legal representative of a deceased alienee from...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »