Advanced Search Results
Parshuram Ramchandra Mohite and ors. Vs. State
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Jul-18-1969
Criminal
1970CriLJ1296
ORDERWagle, J. 1. Since these two revision applications raise an exactly similar point, these two applications are being disposed of by one judgment although the incidents are different and the accused are also different.Criminal Revision Application...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNarayan Rama Sambrekar Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Jul-18-1969
Criminal
(1970)72BOMLR154; 1970MhLJ283
Wagle, J.1. Since these two revision applications raise an exactly similar point, these two applications are being disposed of by one judgment although the incidents are different and the accused are also different.Criminal R.A. No. 249...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarikishan Agrawal Vs. the State of Maharshtra
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Apr-24-1969
Criminal
1970CriLJ788
ORDERWagle, J.1. This petition raises a question whether the City Sessions Court had the jurisdiction to entertain a complaint filed by the Public Prosecutor under the provisions of Section 198-B of the Criminal Procedure Code.2. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Purushottam Shankar Desai Vs. Dayaram Jayaram Dhande
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Jul-01-1970
Contempt of Court
(1971)73BOMLR313; 1971MhLJ1017
Wagle, J.1. This is a petition by the landlords against an order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal directing that possession of the disputed land be restored to the tenant Dayaram and the heirs of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTrimbak Balwant Kulkarni Vs. Chahala Bhikha Rajput
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Jul-29-1970
Tenancy
(1971)73BOMLR537; 1971MhLJ798
Wagle, J.1. The point that arises in this petition is whether the amendment effected in Section 82M of the Bombay Tenancy Act by Maharashtra Act No. XXXI of 1965 is retrospective in effect. The point arises...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Mysore Vs. Ramchandra Gunda and anr.
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Nov-24-1970
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 300
AIR1972Bom93; (1971)73BOMLR723; ILR1972Bom142; 1973MhLJ521
1. This is an appeal by the State of Mysore challenging the orders passed by the two lower Courts granting damages to the plaintiff for loss caused by reason of water overflowing from a reservoir constructed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Bombay Vs. HusseIn Kasim Kanhekar
Mumbai
V.G. Wagle, J.
Dec-14-1966
Labour and Industrial
Bombay Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rule 55; Constitution of India - Article 311 and 311(2)
(1968)ILLJ624Bom; 1967MhLJ889
1. This is an appeal by the State against the appellate order confirming the order passed by the trial Court which has set aside the order dated 23 June, 1951, passed by the Special Superintendent, Land...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahadu Bala Botra and anr. Vs. Namdeo Bapuji Karale and ors.
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Jun-18-1970
Tenancy
Tenancy Laws; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 84-A
AIR1972Bom25; (1971)73BOMLR318; 1971MhLJ1014
ORDER1. An interesting point of law that arises in this case is whether the expression 'any person other than the tenant in actual possession' used in the second proviso to Section 84-A of the Tenancy Act...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaban Krishnarao Misal Vs. Narayan Yeshwant Godse and ors.
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Aug-28-1971
TenancyLimitation
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 33-A and 33-B(4)
AIR1972Bom375; (1972)74BOMLR310; ILR1972Bom1284; 1972MhLJ560
ORDER1. The short point that arises in this petition is whether the petition for possession under Section 33 - B of the Tenancy Act made by the petitioner was barred by limitation. The petitioner was a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDadu Narayan Patil Vs. Jamnibai Ragho Patil and ors.
Mumbai
Wagle, J.
Jun-17-1971
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 84; Constitution of India - Article 227
AIR1973Bom192; (1972)74BOMLR625; ILR1972Bom910; 1972MhLJ912
ORDER1. This is a petition by an opponent to an application made by the heir of the tenant to claim possession under Section 84 of the Tenancy Act in which an order for eviction was passed....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »