Advanced Search Results

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Pushpa Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Amitava Lala and ;Vedpal, JJ.

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2009ACJ2850; 2009(1)AWC187

Amitava Lala, J.1. This is an appeal arising out of judgment and order passed by the District Judge, Mathura on 16th April, 2008.2. The contention of the insurance company is that the insurance policy is made...

Ashwani Garg and Others. Vs. State of U.P.,thru. Prin. Secy., Home and ...

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Abdul Mateen; Vedpal, J.J.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 507 Read with 3 or 4, Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ;

1. Heard Shri Rishad Murtaza, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Satyendra Kumar Singh learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 3 and the learned Additional Government Advocate, who has accepted notices on behalf of opposite...

Parmanand Vs. State of U.P. and Others.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Pradeep Kant; Hon'ble Vedpal, JJ.

Subject : Education

1. Notice on behalf of the respondents has been accepted by the learned Chief Standing Counsel. 2. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Sri H.P. Srivastava for the State. In view of the plea raised...

Asok Pande Vs. Union of India

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Pradeep Kant &Amp; Vedpal

Subject : Land Acquisition

Pradeep Kant, J. (1) Heard Sri Asok Pande, who is one of the petitioners, Sri G.E.Vahanvati, learned Attorney General for India, Dr. Ashok Nigam, Additional Solicitor General of India, Sri I.H. Farooqui, Assistant Solicitor General of...

Arun Govil Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Devi Prasad Singh; Vedpal, JJ.

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. Heard Shri Manish Mathur learned counsel for the petitioner,the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. Petitioner who has been a member of the Indian Air Force was declared unfit on...

Commissioner of Income-tax-i Vs. Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment ...

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Rajes Kumar and ;Vedpal, JJ.

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2010]186TAXMAN131(All)

Rajes Kumar, J. 1. The present appeal at the instance of the revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') is against the order of the Tribunal dated 16-3-2007 in...

State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home and ors. Vs. Krishna Pal So. Raj K ...

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Devi Prasad Singh; Vedpal, JJ.

Subject : Right to Information

1. Heard learned standing counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the claimant respondent and perused record. 2. According to petitioners' counsel, the claimant respondent was selected for the post of Constable in the year 2006....

Kalyan Sansthan Uttar Pradesh and Another Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh a ...

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Pradeep Kant Vedpal, JJ.

Subject : Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860, - Section 12-D, 13-D sub clause (5) (3) of Section 24, 23,

1. Heard the counsel for the appellants Sri Ram Avtar Verma and Sri D.K. Upadhyaya, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. The appellant no. 1, a society registered under the provisions of Societies Registration Act,...

Shishir Jaiswal. Vs. State of U.P., Thru. Prin. Secy.,home and Others.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Abdul Mateen; Vedpal, J.J.

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 498-A, 504, 506, 325, 456, 307, 454 Read with 3 or 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ;

1. Heard Shri I.B.Singh, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 3 and Shri U.P.Singh learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5.2.This petition has been filed with the...

Babu Hargovind Dayal Trust, Lucknow Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ...

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Pradeep Kant; Vedpal, J.

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 80-G

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate and Sri D.D. Chopra for the respondents. 2. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf respondents 2 and 3, but the petitioner has...